Mount Sinai Ranked a Global Leader in Health Care Research

Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, Professor of Immunology and Immunotherapy at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (left), and Miriam Merad, MD, PhD, Mount Sinai Professor in Cancer Immunology (right), at an immunology lab with researchers.

Each year, the Nature Index—a database produced by academic publisher Springer Nature that tracks research output—puts out a ranking list of leading institutions, organizations, and corporations with publications in prestigious journals.

In the Nature Index 2025 Research Leaders list released in June, the Mount Sinai Health System earned top marks: among health care institutions in the United States and North America, it was No. 5 for its research output. When compared against health care institutions around the world, Mount Sinai ranked sixth.

“These rankings are a reflection of the spectacular success that we have had in building innovative research programs at Mount Sinai,” said Eric J. Nestler, MD, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer of the Mount Sinai Health System and Interim Dean of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. In recent years, the Health System and the Icahn School have launched several new departments, institutes, centers, and programs in key areas of biomedicine and health care delivery, he noted.

The ranking is based on a score that takes into account the number of published papers in a defined list of prestigious journals, as well as contributing authors’ share of the papers. Mount Sinai was the only health care institution among the top 10 to have improved its adjusted share score in this year’s ranking from the previous year.

Attaining that ranking is no small feat, considering Mount Sinai researchers focus only on a narrow scope of topics within health and life sciences, and do not produce research in other areas, including engineering, energy sciences, and astronomy.

As U.S. research institutions enter a period of funding uncertainty, staying a leader will take boldness and creativity, and Mount Sinai’s ability to respond with unusual nimbleness to opportunities as they arise will certainly help, said Dr. Nestler. “We have formulated a new strategic plan for research that will guide our continued growth, development, and leadership over the next 5 to 10 years,” he said.

Curious about where Mount Sinai shone in research? Take a look at the tables below, which showcase the journals Mount Sinai researchers had authored most papers in, as well as leading research topics.

Top five journals Mount Sinai published in during 2024
Leading research topics for Mount Sinai in 2024
Number Publication name Article count
1 Nature Communications 96
2 Nature 37
3 Journal of the American College of Cardiology 37
4 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 30
5 Nature Medicine 21
Number Research topic Article count
1 Clinical sciences 165
2 Oncology and carcinogenesis 120
3 Cardiovascular medicine and hematology 85
4 Neurosciences 41
5 Nutrition and dietetics 37

Stories Behind the Science: Dennis S. Charney, MD, and Psychiatry

Stories Behind the Science: Dennis S. Charney, MD, and Psychiatry

Dennis S. Charney, MD, Anne and Joel Ehrenkranz Dean of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, created a legacy by serving as Dean for 18 years—one of the longest tenures of any medical school dean in the United States. His research career has been just as illustrious over the decades.

Rooted in psychiatry, pharmacology, and neurobiology, Dr. Charney’s research has resulted in treatment breakthroughs for depression, enhanced medical and scientific understanding, and led to two U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies. He has published more than 800 articles, which have been cited more than 198,000 times, according to Google Scholar, and was elected to the prestigious National Academy of Medicine in 2000.

One of his biggest research milestones was discovering that ketamine can be used as a fast-acting antidepressant, offering a useful alternative for patients who do not respond well to conventional therapies. However, pursuing that discovery was not easy amid societal stigma at the time.

“We were looked at like we were pursuing a PCP study or something,” said Dr. Charney, referring to the recreational street drug. “But we knew we had something big on our hands. We were on the verge of discovering something that could change the lives of patients, and we were very motivated. We weren’t scared, and we went about doing it the right way.”

In addition to discovering the antidepressive effects of ketamine, Dr. Charney is known for his work on the science of resilience, and for his role in the first FDA-approved digital therapeutic for depression.

Read more below about the decades of Dr. Charney’s research efforts, and what it was like being at the frontier.

The Beginnings:
A Focus on Bringing
Bench to Bedside

A young Dr. Charney (right) with mentor and collaborator George Heninger, MD (left), photo taken in 1996.

In the early 1980s, working at the Yale School of Medicine in conjunction with the Connecticut Mental Health Center, Dr. Charney was focused on understanding the pathophysiology of serious forms of depression, along with panic and anxiety disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

“We wanted to develop better treatments for these conditions,” said Dr. Charney.

At the time, the neurotransmitters serotonin and norepinephrine were known to be involved in some psychiatric conditions, and Dr. Charney and his team members were developing methods of examining those relationships closely.

“It’s fair to say we developed, at that time, more sophisticated ways of studying those neurotransmitters,” he said, adding, “although they’re probably not considered sophisticated today.”

Those efforts led to the study of yohimbine, an alkaloid of the bark of the yohimbe tree, which revealed that excessive norepinephrine function was involved in panic disorder and PTSD (Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1984, now JAMA Psychiatry).

“That study was a great example of a combination of going from the lab to studying patients,” he said.

While a number of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors were emerging at the time, Dr. Charney’s findings were showing that targeting these neurotransmitters alone were insufficient to move the needle on treating depression.

“However, I felt that just looking at serotonin and norepinephrine couldn’t tell us the whole story about depression,” said Dr. Charney.

Finding Alternatives: Ketamine and the Glutamate System

Starting in the late 1980s, the treatment of major depression moved toward using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). However, there was still a notable proportion of patients for whom these drugs were not effective enough.

“In patients who were not doing better, we tried to augment the serotonin system,” said Dr. Charney. “It didn’t work.”

“With all the studies we’ve been doing in depression, we thought monoamines told only part of the story in depression,” he noted, referring to the class of neurotransmitters that includes dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. “So we thought maybe there is another system that was, in part, regulated by the monoamines, but would be more fundamentally involved in depression.”

In the early 1990s, Dr. Charney and his collaborator at Yale, John H. Krystal, MD, began looking for a pathway affected by monoamine neurotransmitters, and through a logical progression of studies, focused on the glutamate system and, soon, on ketamine—an anesthetic with known effects on the glutamate system. This work yielded some of Dr. Charney’s top-cited papers (Arch Gen Psych, 1994).

In the mid-1990s, Drs. Charney and Krystal did a series of studies on ketamine, first on healthy volunteers and then a small trial on seven patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The results were shocking.

“The patients got better in a few hours,” recalled Dr. Charney. “I was like, ‘Are you kidding me?’ As an investigator watching it, it was like a miracle.”

Dennis S. Charney, MD (right) with John H. Krystal, MD (left), being awarded the Colvin Prize at the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation Gala, November 2019.

Drs. Charney and Krystal published their findings (Biological Psychiatry, 2000), but faced skepticism from both the scientific and general communities. The study was dismissed as not being replicable, and additionally for the fact that the researchers were working with a compound that was stigmatized for its recreational use.

When Dr. Charney went to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) in 2000, he sought to repeat history. “Nobody believed it, nobody was trying to replicate it, so we’re going to have to do it ourselves at NIMH,” he said. “In the second study, we replicated it dead on.”

At the end of his stint at NIMH in 2004, Dr. Charney brought his findings with him to the Mount Sinai School of Medicine (now the Icahn School of Medicine), where he began his career as Dean of Research.

Dr. Charney is a named co-inventor on patents filed by Mount Sinai relating to the use of ketamine for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression and suicidal ideation. Mount Sinai licensed those patents to Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the development of SPRAVATO (esketamine) by Janssen, which received FDA approval in 2019. Its approval makes it the first antidepressant of its kind to target N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors—introducing the first new class of antidepressant drugs since the 1950s.

A Prescription for Resilience

In the 1990s, Dr. Charney turned his focus to studying trauma and PTSD, in collaboration with Steven M. Southwick, MD. That journey led to some of Dr. Charney’s most impactful work on understanding resilience.

“My buddy, Steve Southwick, was really involved in that work,” said Dr. Charney of his colleague, who passed away in 2022. “He’s on a lot of my papers, and he became my closest friend.” The ties between the two researchers dated back to before the 1980s.

Drs. Charney and Southwick tackled understanding PTSD from all angles—psychological, biological, social, pharmacological. Then, they had an idea to take their findings a step further to help patients.

“Back then, we thought, ‘If we studied people who were resilient—people who had been traumatized but didn’t develop PTSD—perhaps we could learn something from it, and apply those lessons to help patients with PTSD,” said Dr. Charney. “That’s how I ended up studying resilience for over 30 years.”

Dr. Charney’s paper on resilience (Am. J. Psychiatry, 2004) became one of his most cited works after his publications on ketamine in depression. He and Dr. Southwick then published a book called “Resilience: The Science of Mastering Life’s Greatest Challenges” (Cambridge University Press, 2012).

The book, now in its third edition, is rooted in the hundreds of interviews Drs. Charney and Southwick did with people who faced challenges in their lives—including prisoners of war and survivors of sexual and physical abuse. It includes a “prescription” for being resilient—10 steps that people can take to overcome life challenges.

From left to right, Dennis S. Charney, MD; Steven M. Southwick, MD; and John H. Krystal, MD.

“Not just for others—our research on resilience was also a personal journey,” said Dr. Charney. In 2016, Dr. Charney survived being shot, and he credits the lessons on resilience for overcoming that ordeal.

Those resilient factors also helped Dr. Charney navigate the stresses of the COVID-19 pandemic, and he established the Center for Stress, Resilience and Personal Growth in 2020 to extend that support to Mount Sinai staff.

Through Boldness,
a New Therapy Emerges

 

In 2024, the FDA approved a new class of treatments: digital therapeutics. In that class was REJOYN, a prescription smartphone app by Click Therapeutics and Otsuka Precision Health for major depressive disorder. That novel treatment had its beginnings through Dr. Charney’s research.

“This goes back to when we were interviewing prisoners of war who were subject to solitary confinement in Vietnam,” said Dr. Charney. “Some of them said that when they were in solitary, all they could do was think.”

A Life Magazine cover from 1967, featuring a prisoner of war from the Vietnam War, whom Drs. Charney and Southwick had interviewed as part of their research on resilience. That body of work eventually led to the development of Rejoyn, a digital app for treating depression.

Over time, some of those individuals reported developing cognitive capacities they never had before, such as being able to do complex multiplication with just their mind. “To me, that suggested evidence of neuroplasticity, where you can change the chemistry and circuits in your brain through repeated tasks,” said Dr. Charney.

With that inspiration, Dr. Charney pondered whether neuroplasticity could be tapped to “correct” the brain circuitry of patients with depression and improve their symptoms.

“We knew something about the circuits of depression that involved the prefrontal cortex and subcortical regions, like the amygdala. What if we developed a task that involved both of those regions?” he said.

Brian Iacoviello, PhD, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at the Icahn School of Medicine, and Dr. Charney developed the Emotional Faces Memory Task and ran two randomized controlled studies. The findings (npj Digital Medicine, 2018) showed that patients who did the task repeatedly had improvements in their depression symptoms.

Drs. Charney and Iacoviello are co-inventors of patents filed by Mount Sinai for the Emotional Faces Memory Task intervention for the treatment of depression and related psychiatric disorders. Mount Sinai licensed the patents to Click Therapeutics, Inc. and Otsuka Precision Health for the development of REJOYN, a digital treatment for depression. REJOYN received FDA clearance in 2024, as the first prescription adjunctive treatment for adults with MDD.

“Like with ketamine for depression, I see going for a digital approach for depression as a story about being bold,” said Dr. Charney. “Each time, it was a realization that our current understanding isn’t enough, and it’s worth it to take a different approach.”

With more than 50 patents, and a slew of scientific achievements, what’s next for Dr. Charney? “Resilience will continue to inspire me after I step down as Dean,” he said.

Dr. Charney steps down as Dean from the Icahn School of Medicine on Monday, June 30, and Eric J. Nestler, MD, PhD, has been appointed Interim Dean.

“I’m going to need to figure out how to be inspired next. I’m going to continue my research in depression and resilience,” said Dr. Charney. One option that’s underway is working on the fourth edition of his book on resilience. But there might be other bold options out there too.

“I have two therapies on the market,” said Dr. Charney. “My goal is to discover a third. I’m not sure if anyone in psychiatry has ever done that.”

Annual Symposium of the Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute Emphasizes Bold Discussions and Innovation in Health Care

The 13th annual symposium of the Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (BMEII) at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai emphasized bold discussions and innovation in health care.

The event featured distinguished worldwide academic and industry leaders who participated in informal conversations and panel discussions about innovation and transformation in health care. The theme, “beBOLD,” captured the spirit of pioneering advancements in health care technology and “the human drive to explore, innovate, and unite in the pursuit of greater knowledge and understanding,” said BMEII Director Zahi Fayad, PhD.

“Health care is a constantly evolving field that demands adaptive scientists, clinicians, and engineers to build the infrastructure to support this evolution,” he added. “This symposium addressed the innovation reshaping the landscape and bringing ideas closer to real-world patient impact.”

More than 370 people attended the symposium, including researchers, physicians, medical students and trainees, and industry leaders inside and outside of health care. The event was held at the New York Academy of Medicine on Wednesday and Thursday, March 19-20.

Brendan Carr, MD, MA, MS, Chief Executive Officer and Professor and Kenneth L. Davis, MD, Distinguished Chair, Mount Sinai Health System, kicked off the symposium with welcome remarks. Dr. Carr explained the importance of the symposium’s theme and how it encompasses Mount Sinai’s vision and ethos. He highlighted BMEII’s multidisciplinary nature and drive to solve problems, leading to new models for delivering care. His remarks set the tone for the event, aligning the audience’s expectations and generating excitement for what lay ahead.

The symposium hosted two one-on-one discussions, with a standout moment the “Bold Discussion” between Arianna Huffington and David Rubenstein, Co-Founder and Co-Chairman of The Carlyle Group. Interviewed by Mr. Rubenstein, Ms. Huffington shared her inspiration behind creating Thrive Global, a behavior change technology focused on improving well-being and productivity. She emphasized the five scientifically-backed keys to a healthier life—sleep, food, exercise, stress management, and connection—and the power of incremental, consistent habit changes to achieve this well-roundedness.

The second discussion, titled “Bold Healthcare,” featured a conversation between Scott Gottlieb, MD, a former Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration who is a partner at the venture capital firm New Enterprise Associates, and Whitney Casey, Partner and Co-Founder of Tally Health. It addressed the future of health care startups, their transformative potential, and the regulatory landscape shaping these emerging ventures. The perspectives of Mr. Gottlieb, a health care investor, and Ms. Casey, a long-time wellness investor, underscored the importance of investing in novel, disruptive ideas and building them into commercial products.

Both one-on-one discussions addressed the symposium’s forward-thinking theme by discussing innovative health care technologies focusing on both prevention and treatment of well-known conditions for better health outcomes.

A highlight of the four panel discussions was the panel titled “Bold Execution in AI Radiology.” This included five industry and academic leaders and addressed how AI is steering transformation and setting new standards in health care. The panelists also discussed the challenges and concerns faced by physicians when implementing AI into their workflow.

“The digitization of health care, which has been powerful for many reasons, has caused much more burden to be put on the radiologist now,” said John Paulett, BSE, an engineer at HOPPR, a firm building an AI model for medical imaging and an advisor at Rad AI. “I think what we often get is ‘how can we take some of that burden off the radiologist to let them practice what they are good at?’ It’s not the clerical work that they’re good at [or] the administrative work that they’re good at. So, we’ve approached this less from a diagnostic perspective and more from a workflow and an avenue of how we can make the radiologists focus on the interpretation of images—what they’re trained to do well.”

He and his team have revolutionized radiology reporting practices and combined technological expertise with strategic vision to build innovative natural language processing and machine learning solutions in health care.

Timothy W. Deyer, MD, MSE, Chief Medical Information Officer of East River Medical Imaging, the only practicing radiologist on the panel, echoed his concerns about AI.

“The current environment is very fragmented. We have a lot of very small solutions that do very specific things, and I can tell you it’s an absolute pain in the neck to implement sometimes. Having a more cohesive product that more seamlessly integrates into the workflow is incredibly important,” said Dr. Deyer.

Outside of the rigorous panel discussions, the symposium also included sessions geared towards building young scientists’ knowledge and networks.

The Early Career Session guided students and postdoctoral fellows through obtaining their first grant. The poster and innovation station sessions allowed attendees to hear about current research in the field of medical imaging by BMEII members and scientists from other institutes.

Working on the Front Lines During the Early Days of the Pandemic Helped Her Commit to a Career in Clinical Research

Nicole Simons, MA, right, with Katherine Keller, Clinical Research Coordinator

When the first of several waves of COVID-19 cases hit New York City, Nicole Simons, MA, had just landed her first big job out of school as a research coordinator at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. In a matter of days, her dream job was eliminated, along with the jobs of several colleagues.

Then came the call from Human Resources: Could she take on a front-line job that would expose her to this unknown virus and clinics filled with COVID-19 patients? Her answer was a resounding yes.

In a moment of instant serendipity, she was reassigned to work for Alexander Charney, MD, PhD, a noted researcher in the field of schizophrenia, a disease that had first captured her attention in college.

Working closely with clinicians on the front lines during the pandemic would turn out to be a lifechanging experience. She visited hospital wards to collect samples, helped out staff when she could, and even served as a second author of a paper in Nature Medicine that described the team’s work. Now she is the Program Manager of the Jeff and Lisa Blau Adolescent Consultation Center for Resilience and Treatment and is a PhD student in the Clinical Research Program at the Icahn School of Medicine, with plans to continue research into the genetics of schizophrenia. “Working with clinical colleagues on the frontlines really got me thinking about how to narrow the gap between research and clinical care. I plan to use the lessons I’ve learned to keep building research programs that move us closer to becoming a true learning health care system.”

It’s a long way from those early days of the pandemic in 2020. Dr. Charney, Associate Professor, Psychiatry, and Genetics and Genomic Sciences, had been asked by hospital leadership to rapidly build up a COVID-19 Biobank that would collect hundreds of blood samples from patients hospitalized with COIVD-19. It would ultimately serve as a backbone for ongoing research into the virus and the human immune response.

Nicole Simons, MA

Dr. Charney’s team consisted of 100 volunteers who, like Ms. Simons, had seen their research projects paused but were given a chance to come help. The team quickly designed a sample-collection protocol, and once this was in place, the cadre of volunteers organized itself into six teams, with Ms. Simons assigned to the “Running Team.” This team was responsible for transporting collection kits to every location within the hospital, and then bringing those kits back.

What might sound like a simple and straightforward assignment involved a major hurdle. How to gain access to clinics where new hospital rules would not even allow families to enter, even when patients were seriously ill?  Ms. Simons would have to find a way in.

“Entering those clinics was like entering a fog of war environment. The strain on the nurses and doctors was palpable; we needed to visit their clinics without creating additional work for them” she says. They had to figure out a way to make easy for them to know if they should allow the researchers on the floor.

“I came up with this idea of making our research team stand apart so we’d be instantly recognizable.” Her solution: hot pink everything. “We wanted to stand out, so we wore hot pink scrubs, gloves, hairnets. Even our labels were pink,” she says. She and her teammates quickly developed a rapport with the nurses managing the floors they’d visit at all hours of the day and night.

“I felt like we were on the outside looking in, that we were somehow protected bystanders while they provided round-the-clock, unconditional care for their patients. To say thank you and support them, we brought them candy and other treats,” she says. They heard that nurses working in the tents constructed in Central Park needed clean, dry socks, so they asked for sock donations, and the response was instantaneous.

Lending help to the clinicians working in the hardest of circumstances also perpetuated for her a sense of shared purpose with staff and faculty at Mount Sinai. Among the volunteers at the Biobank, she found strength.

During the pandemic, Nicole Simons, MA, left, and a team collected hundreds of blood samples from patients hospitalized with COIVD-19, working with MIriam Merad, MD, PhD, center, Dean for Translational Research and Therapeutic Innovation, and Alexander Charney, MD, PhD,

“We all shared this common goal to collect those samples, no matter the hurdles.  When the hours were long, and the days were hard, we had this shared humanity that pulled us through,” she says.

When the team reached its goal of 500 samples, they pushed on, ultimately sampling more than 700 participants in 49 days, amounting to more than 10,000 vacutainers portioned into 50,000 smaller samples. A high level of organization was critical to success.

“But strong morale, in the darkest of times, was what really got us through those long days,” she says.  “At such a difficult time, it felt like a huge stroke of luck to be working for Dr. Charney, a psychiatrist, leading the Biobank team. His commitment to resilience and mental health was non-stop. He created a safety net for us, with regular weekly check-ins and the option for one-on-one counseling with him any time.”

In July 2020, she served as second author of a paper published in Nature Medicine describing the Biobank’s unique 49- day deep dive to uncover the pathogenicity of the virus. The authors would describe their journey as “not necessarily a model to follow, but rather a live-and-learn memoir of our actions and mistakes under uniquely strenuous circumstances.”

“The team was working intensely in a very high stress, high stakes environment, without much preparation for what we would all come to realize was a once in a lifetime experience,” says Dr. Charney, now Director of The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine and Vice Chair of the Windreich Department of AI and Human Health. “Their mental health was front and center for me. What pulled them through, I believe, was their strong purpose and being part of the group that didn’t have to stay home.”

How Mount Sinai Enabled One Data Scientist to Thrive in the Master of Biomedical Data Science and AI Program

“AI has infiltrated so many different aspects of everyone’s lives over the past few years, but seeing firsthand how it’s been able to make strides in virtually every field of science has been inspiring,” says Neeloy Bose.

Neeloy Bose, a first-year student in the Master of Biomedical Data Science and AI program at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, was already working in a laboratory and understood the importance of “Big Data.” But he concluded that in order to reach his goals, he had to learn more about how to process these large data sets himself, and how that can help researchers like him make discoveries that can improve health and help people.

In a Q&A, he describes how he decided to study at the Icahn School of Medicine and how that has helped him understand the value of studying data science.

Why did you decide to study at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai?

The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai gives me the opportunity to access the resources of a world-renowned medical and academic institution while offering me the flexibility to continue my research externally.  The program specifically offered me the flexibility to continue my master’s studies in a hybrid setting while I am also working at the New York Stem Cell Foundation, a non-profit research institute based in Manhattan. It’s an exciting time to work with these institutions while being able to see what I’m studying brought to life through real world applications in the field.

What attracted you to study Biomedical Data Science and AI? What inspires you?

Working at a high-throughput lab that harnesses the power of automated liquid handling robots, I’ve come to appreciate the process of casually creating terabytes of data. This has only made me more appreciative of the extractive and generative power of data science, especially using AI and machine learning tools. Being able to create “Big Data” as a biologist means that you need someone to be able to work with a humanly incomprehensible amount of information, and what could be better than learning how to do it yourself?

How do you think AI is going to impact Data Science moving forward?

AI has infiltrated so many different aspects of everyone’s lives over the past few years, but seeing firsthand how it’s been able to make strides in virtually every field of science has been inspiring. From high-content image analysis to looking for signatures of rare diseases to even creating tools to assist health care outcomes, the intersection of AI and science seems brighter than ever, and that can only increase the speed at which we make progress towards the greater good.

What are some of your achievements so far as a master’s student?

I’d say being a master’s student is an achievement enough at times, but being able to learn the cutting edge of new technologies and taking that knowledge to be able to apply it to real-world research is fascinating. It almost feels surreal at points to know that you’re always working to advance the future of the field.

What are your plans after you have completed your degree?

I hope to transition from more wet lab facing roles to better integrate computation into my research. With what I’ve learned and will continue to learn through the program, I hope to keep pushing forward what I’ve learned and thought to be the boundaries of what science is capable of. Being able to see my work improving the real-world prospects of patients and health care systems using this ever-evolving technology would be one of my greatest dreams that I think I’ll always be in pursuit of.

How Mount Sinai Equipped Vibhor Mahajan, PhD, With the Skills to Bridge Clinical Research, Public Health, and Entrepreneurship

“The combination of research acumen and entrepreneurial thinking that I cultivated through my experiences has empowered me to drive meaningful change in both academia and industry,” says Vibhor Mahajan, PhD.

Vibhor Mahajan, PhD, earned his PhD in Clinical Research in January 2025 from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Prior to that, he completed a Master of Public Health (MPH) in Healthcare Management. He now works as a Program Manager of Education and Entrepreneurship/Innovation with Mount Sinai Innovation Partners.

In a Q&A, he discusses what brought him to Mount Sinai for both degrees, why he selected this area of study, and how he expects this training to advance his career.

What brought you to Mount Sinai as a master’s student?

My decision to join Mount Sinai was driven by its reputation for cutting-edge research and its dynamic environment at the intersection of health care, technology, and innovation. Coming from an engineering background, I had already transitioned into health care through my work in quality improvement at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center in California, where I saw the potential for data-driven strategies to enhance patient care. Mount Sinai stood out not only for its focus on public health but also for its commitment to translating research into actionable health care solutions. The opportunity to learn from experts actively shaping health care policy and practice made it the ideal place to advance my knowledge and skills.

What were some of your achievements as a master’s student?

During my MPH, I had the chance to work on several impactful projects. One notable achievement was my master’s capstone project, which I worked on under the mentorship of Kritina Monti, PhD, LCSW, and Alexander Preker, MD, PhD. This project involved developing a machine learning-based application aimed at providing personalized care pathways for individuals with substance use disorders. It required analyzing complex datasets to identify behavioral patterns and ultimately conceptualizing an algorithm to improve treatment linkages. Additionally, I conducted a comprehensive analysis of emergency department utilization patterns related to behavioral health, which revealed opportunities for cost savings and better care delivery.

These efforts were recognized with several prestigious awards, which further reinforced my passion for using data-driven approaches to solve complex health care challenges and improve patient outcomes. During my MPH, I also had the opportunity to present my work at the American Public Health Association’s Annual Conference, with a travel grant from the MPH Program. My time as a master’s student was defined by combining technical expertise with public health principles to address real-world challenges in health care. These experiences not only shaped my academic and professional journey but also deepened my commitment to leveraging data and innovation to address pressing healthcare challenges

Why did you choose the PhD in Clinical Research program?

The PhD in Clinical Research at Mount Sinai attracted me because it offered a unique blend of scientific rigor and practical application, which perfectly aligned with my goal of advancing health care innovation. Having already explored process optimization and data-driven decision-making in clinical settings, I wanted to dive deeper into the intricacies of clinical trials and health systems. The program’s focus on developing new methodologies to improve clinical research infrastructure resonated with my passion for enhancing operational efficiency in health care.

What truly set the program apart for me was the opportunity to deepen my clinical research skills and  develop an entrepreneurial mindset through various opportunities offered at Mount Sinai. Through opportunities like the Targeted Healthcare Innovation Fellowship (THRIVE) by Mount Sinai Biodesign, and the Fellows Program by Mount Sinai Innovation Partners, I was able to hone my skills in translating research into practical, market-driven solutions, complementing my academic experience. I give huge credit to my mentors in the areas of entrepreneurship and biomedical ventures, especially Brian Nickerson, PhD, JD (who was also my PhD advisor) and Dov Shamir PhD. Through their guidance, I realized how important it is to have entrepreneurial thinking to bring solutions from bench to bedside and how practicality can improve overall health and quality of life.

As part of my dissertation, I worked closely with the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network, developing a framework to evaluate the performance of clinical trial networks. This experience allowed me to combine both clinical research and entrepreneurial thinking, ensuring that the clinical trials I evaluated were not only scientifically sound but also strategically aligned with broader healthcare goals. The combination of research and entrepreneurial skills I gained throughout the PhD program has equipped me with a comprehensive skill set to drive innovation in both clinical research and health care entrepreneurship.

How did your public health experience help with completing your PhD in Clinical Research?

My public health training provided a crucial lens through which I approached clinical research. In the MPH program, I learned to evaluate health care interventions not only for their clinical efficacy but also for their economic and societal impact. This perspective allowed me to design a holistic evaluation framework for clinical trial networks during my PhD, integrating clinical, economic, and operational metrics to assess performance. Additionally, my experience in health data analysis during the MPH program helped me leverage large datasets to uncover insights about trial efficiency, patient recruitment, and resource allocation. The interdisciplinary nature of public health empowered me to think beyond the lab, considering broader policy implications and the real-world scalability of clinical research innovations.

How are you using your Mount Sinai degrees to advance your career?

My academic journey at Mount Sinai has equipped me with a versatile skill set that bridges clinical research, public health, and entrepreneurship. Today, as Program Manager of Education and Entrepreneurship/Innovation with Mount Sinai Innovation Partners, I help researchers and clinicians navigate the complex process of translating their innovations into viable health care solutions. The combination of research acumen and entrepreneurial thinking that I cultivated through my experiences has empowered me to drive meaningful change in both academia and industry, working to improve health care delivery and patient outcomes on multiple fronts.

Pin It on Pinterest