Training the Next Generation of Psychiatric Physician-Scientists at Mount Sinai

A photo of Deepak Kaji, MD, PhD

Deepak Kaji, MD, PhD

Each year, medical schools confer MD-PhD degrees to those willing to devote years to doctoral research alongside their clinical training. However, the residencies that follow are typically structured so that many aspiring physician-scientists end up becoming one rather than both.

“Residencies rarely make sufficient room for physicians to also train as scientists, and we’re losing a lot of physician-scientists because of it,” says Deepak Kaji, MD, PhD, an Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Because the PhD is sandwiched between years of medical school, MD-PhDs arrive at their residency program after two years away from the bench. Afterward, physicians must either look for postdoctoral positions to reorient themselves to a lab or bid farewell to that part of their training.

Dr. Kaji found a rare opportunity in the National Institutes of Health-funded R25 Physician-Scientist Training Program within the Psychiatry Residency at The Mount Sinai Hospital.

“Choosing Mount Sinai allowed me to begin building my research career on day one instead of starting a decade later,” he says.

Recruiting the Right People

As an undergraduate, Dr. Kaji studied how to direct pluripotent stem cells toward becoming heart tissue, an entry point into what he describes as the field’s central marvel.

“Every human being begins as a ball of cells with essentially infinite potential,” he explains. “Somehow, nature guides those cells toward becoming hair, teeth, pancreas, liver, or the heart.”

His affinity for stem cell research arrived as scientists were learning to reproduce that process in a dish. Gordon Keller, PhD, then at Mount Sinai, was coaxing stem cells into heart tissue, while others were making pancreas and brain tissue. For Dr. Kaji, watching those lineages being built for the first time was both exciting and an invitation.

“The idea of making something new felt like a crowning achievement,” he says.

When Dr. Kaji first showed interest in the MD-PhD program at Mount Sinai, program leadership emphasized the physician-scientist track residencies as a selling point. “They told me that being a scientist and a physician would dovetail, that each would make me better at the other,” he says.

It was encouraging that they were describing their residency program to someone who had not yet started medical school. This approach suggested they were thinking about the entire arc of a career, not just the next four years.

Applying Stem Cell Biology to Psychiatry Research

In the MD-PhD program, Dr. Kaji applied his stem cell biology background to musculoskeletal biology. His doctoral work focused on generating a protocol to create tendons and fibrocartilage from stem cells.

Returning to the clinical portion of medical school, he found himself drawn to psychiatry and investigating the mysteries of the brain and behavior. The question was then how to deploy his scientific training.

“Once I knew what I wanted to do, I started thinking about ways to apply my techniques to generate organoids as models of specific brain regions,” says Dr. Kaji. An organoid is a cluster of cells grown in a lab to mimic some of the structure and functions of a real organ.

“Choosing Mount Sinai allowed me to begin building my research career on day one instead of starting a decade later.” — Deepak Kaji, MD, PhD

Dr. Kaji began investigating schizophrenia based on his conviction that the disease starts far earlier than its diagnosis suggests.

“In twin studies, the twin who eventually develops the disorder is typically late to walk, speak, and potty train,” explains Dr. Kaji. “That gradual developmental divergence signals a slow degradation of the cognitive repertoire that happens for decades before the disease outwardly manifests.”

This is precisely the developmental window an organoid occupies by recapitulating the earliest phases of brain development. His proposal to use organoids as a model system to study schizophrenia earned him the 2024–2025 Lipschultz Research Scholar Award from the Friedman Brain Institute.

Neuropsychiatric disease is difficult to study—it is hard to explain why something in the brain breaks when no one fully understands how the brain works. Although an organoid does not answer every question, it offers insights that other models cannot.

“If you want to know how the disease disrupts high-order circuitry, this isn’t your system,” Dr. Kaji says. “If you want to know what happens as those circuits are being assembled, as cells differentiate and the brain organizes in the first trimester, it’s a great one.”

Creating New Tools for Hard Questions

One revelation from his work is the role of cell-autonomous effects, meaning that a cell’s identity may drive its vulnerability to disease. Dr. Kaji explains that radial glial cells, an early brain progenitor, appear heavily disrupted in organoids generated using stem cells from patients with schizophrenia.

“We’re seeing powerful disruptions in this one cell type at a developmental stage before any type of circuitry has formed,” he says. This suggests that vulnerability is a consequence of the molecular programming responsible for a cell’s final identity.

“Organoids allow me to build the cells, watch them come into existence, and ask how those programs confer vulnerability or resilience,” explains Dr. Kaji.

But that question can only be asked about cell types that science knows how to build. Protocols do not yet exist for every lineage, the developmental route a stem cell takes to become one specific cell type. Because building a brain region means learning how to make the cell types that define it, that gap leaves some regions off-limits to organoid research.

The hippocampus region of the brain is Dr. Kaji’s current focus. “I can’t think of a single neuropsychiatric or neurodegenerative disease without hippocampal involvement,” he says. “I’m working on creating hippocampal organoids because a better tool improves every disease model that follows.”

The benefit would also extend beyond individual diseases. Dr. Kaji notes that in Alzheimer’s disease, some regions are affected early, some late, and some almost never.

“This suggests that cells in each region show an intrinsic vulnerability or resistance to the disease,” he explains. “If we could identify what makes cells resilient, the next question is whether that resilience could be extended to vulnerable cells.”

A Long-Term Investment in Physician-Scientists

After entering the MD-PhD program, Dr. Kaji watched those ahead of him in the physician-scientist track and saw a pattern. They found mentors suited to their interests, began building research programs during residency, and left with faculty positions and career development awards that help confer scientific independence.

“It’s not uncommon for people to receive a K Award in their 40s,” he says, describing the National Institutes of Health Career Development Award grants designed to help early-career researchers become independent scientists. “I was watching people here get them in their mid-30s because the residency program followed through on its promise to make time for research.”

That track record has produced a faculty population that is substantially homegrown. Approximately 50 percent of those who complete the Psychiatry Physician-Scientist Residency Program stay at Mount Sinai, which Dr. Kaji sees as a sign of mutual respect.

His own transition from resident to faculty member was smoother than most, the product of a decade of relationships built as a student and resident. He just received his K08 career development award and now runs a lab two floors above where he completed his doctoral work, in a building where his former instructors are now his colleagues.

“They never stop investing in us,” he says. “For those who stay, there is a real commitment to helping us finish what we set out to build.”

Largest Neuroimaging Study of Bulimia Nervosa Finds Structural Brain Differences Linked to Diagnosis and Binge-Eating Severity

An illustration shows how cortical surface area and subcortical volume lower in individuals with bulimia nervosa compared with controls.

Cortical surface area and subcortical volume lower in individuals with bulimia nervosa compared with controls.

Researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai found that people with bulimia nervosa have structural differences in brain regions involved in reward and motivation, as well as social and sensory processing, and that more frequent binge eating is associated with more widespread differences in brain structure. Their findings were recently published in JAMA Psychiatry.

Bulimia nervosa is the second most common eating disorder in the world, characterized by recurrent binge eating and compensatory behaviors. Compared to other psychiatric illnesses, little is known about its neurobiology, and previous neuroimaging studies have generally included small numbers of participants and produced inconsistent findings.

“This study gives us the clearest evidence to date that bulimia nervosa is associated with reproducible differences in brain structure. We were surprised that the differences we identified in the brain’s outer layer involved a structural feature that is largely established early in development,” says Laura A. Berner, PhD, Director of the Center for Computational Psychiatry at Mount Sinai.

A portrait of Laura A. Berner, PhD

Laura A. Berner, PhD

Dr. Berner and colleagues from the global ENIGMA (Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis) consortium analyzed MRI brain scans from 369 females with bulimia nervosa and 417 females without an eating disorder across 17 international cohorts.

In comparison to people without an eating disorder, those with bulimia nervosa had lower volume of the nucleus accumbens – a brain region involved in processing reward and motivation. They also had lower surface area in regions of the temporal cortex – a brain area involved in sensory and social processing.

More frequent binge eating was associated with lower surface area in additional regions involved in cognitive control, reward value estimation, awareness of bodily signals, and processing and regulating emotions. In contrast, the frequency of compensatory behaviors—the measure currently used to define bulimia nervosa severity—was not associated with brain structure.

The findings suggest that specific symptoms, like binge eating, may have distinct neurobiological correlates. Because the study examined participants at a single point in time, longitudinal research is needed to determine whether these differences precede or follow illness onset.

“Our findings raise important questions about whether some of these brain differences could be markers of vulnerability to developing the illness. At the same time, the findings should not be interpreted to mean that the brain is fixed, or that a person’s outcome is predetermined,” says Dr. Berner. “We are excited about the next steps: understanding what these findings mean for the function of the affected brain circuits, and how these insights can ultimately help us identify better targets for prevention and treatment.”

Who Is at Risk of Postpartum Psychosis—and Is It Treatable?

A photo of a new mother holding her baby.

Having a baby can turn your world upside down.

Many new mothers experience a feeling of sadness that may last for a few weeks and go away on its own. And about one in eight women reported signs of a more significant postpartum depression, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

A much smaller group of women, about one in a thousand, have a far more severe concern called postpartum psychosis. For years, there has been little awareness of postpartum psychosis. Lately, the condition has been in the news. When caught early, postpartum psychosis can be treated successfully.

In this Q&A, Veerle Bergink, MD, PhD, a psychiatrist and Director of Mount Sinai’s Women’s Mental Health Center, explains some of the key symptoms of postpartum psychosis, its likely causes, and some possible treatments.

A photo of Veerle Bergink, MD, PhD

Veerle Bergink, MD, PhD

“The most important thing to know is that postpartum psychosis is very treatable,” Dr. Bergink says. “If you detect and treat it, the woman will be fine. In our study, 98 percent of women got better, sometimes within days or weeks.” Under her leadership, Mount Sinai is researching the diagnosis and treatment of postpartum psychosis and has played a major role in attempting to shed light on this often-ignored condition.

How do you diagnose postpartum psychosis?

Postpartum psychosis is a severe mental illness that shows up during the first three months after childbirth. Women with this condition can display mania, psychosis, or depression with psychotic features. They may have these symptoms: 

  • Mania: When someone has a manic episode, thoughts race through their heads. They may behave in ways that are excessive. Sometimes people buy a lot, or they have grand plans. Their moods can be really over the top. They’re not happy, they’re over the moon. Or they are very irritable, they’re very, very annoyed by everyone and everything. 
  • Psychosis: This is when someone loses touch with reality. They may hear things that no one else does or see things that are not there. They might have weird ideas or become extremely paranoid or have delusions of grandiosity, religion or guilt. 
  • Depression with psychotic features: This is when someone’s mood is really low, and at the same time, they have lost touch with reality. For example, they don’t think that their child is crying a lot today but that they are the devil. They don’t think they’re responsible for a minor disagreement but that all wars are their fault.

These symptoms can vary, too. A woman might have mania, then dive quickly into a depression. She might have mania and depression at the same time. Or she might have symptoms one day, seem normal the next day, then display symptoms again later.

How does this look to family and friends?

Basically, you have a sense that something is off. You might think, “I know my sister, daughter, wife, and this is not her.”

How serious is postpartum psychosis?

Postpartum psychosis is very serious. If left untreated, there is a high risk of suicide. The  infanticide risk is very low, but if it happens it gets understandably a lot of media attention. Fortunately, it is highly treatable.

What are treatments for postpartum psychosis?

To treat postpartum psychosis, we start women with antipsychotic medication and lithium. Antipsychotics can be tapered after the acute phase (usually a few weeks) and women are advised to take lithium for one  year and then taper. Electroconvulsive therapy works as good as lithium. If a woman who had postpartum psychosis gets pregnant again, we advise to restart treatment the same day after they give birth to prevent another episode. There is no risk of postpartum psychosis during pregnancy, just after delivery. Women with bipolar disorder are at high risk for postpartum psychosis as well. They can prevent it by taking medication immediately after delivery.

It is also vital to make sure women with postpartum psychosis get enough sleep. They need a partner who can provide all the infant care overnight so the woman can sleep. This is especially key during the first few days and weeks after the birth. 

What causes postpartum psychosis?

We are not sure exactly what causes postpartum psychosis, but we do have several ideas. After women give birth, they experience a sudden, sharp decrease in estrogen and progesterone called a “hormone free fall.” We think this is one of the triggers. But when researchers tried to prevent this freefall with hormone replacement therapy, it didn’t protect women from experiencing postpartum psychosis. So, while hormone free fall probably contributes to postpartum psychosis, it isn’t the sole cause.

What else might be involved?

We think the immune system is also part of the problem. While a woman is pregnant, her immune system adapts to avoid rejecting the fetus the way it might reject a donated liver or kidney. But after she gives birth, the immune system goes back to the way it had been. Most autoimmune diseases have a flare-up after delivery. We know, for instance, that women with rheumatoid arthritis usually feel better during pregnancy. But after they give birth, the rheumatoid arthritis symptoms come back. Given that all disorders with postpartum onset in general medicine are immune related, we think that immune dysfunction plays a major role in postpartum psychosis as well. We have done small studies and urgently need funding for larger studies.

Who is most likely to develop postpartum psychosis?

It is just bad luck. Postpartum psychosis happens in women of all backgrounds and educational levels all over the world. But there are two groups of women who have a very high risk of postpartum psychosis:

  • Women who have bipolar disorder: Their risk goes from 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 6 for postpartum psychosis and 1 in 6 for postpartum depression. So that means women with bipolar disorder have a 1 in 3 risk for becoming mentally ill after childbirth.
  • Women who have already had postpartum psychosis: Their risk also rises from 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 3 to get seriously ill after delivery (both postpartum depression and postpartum psychosis)

How do I reduce my risk of postpartum psychosis?

If you are at high risk of postpartum psychosis, you should begin treatment right after you give birth to prevent it.

What does scientific research say about postpartum psychosis?

Recent studies have underlined the link between the condition and bipolar disorder. Researchers are working hard to spread the word about postpartum psychosis and have it recognized as an official diagnosis.

 

Four Faculty Members in the Department of Psychiatry Receive Distinguished Faculty Awards

Four faculty members in the Department of Psychiatry were recognized with Distinguished Faculty Awards from the Division of Psychology. The four recipients of these awards showcase excellence in clinical care, faculty mentorship, innovation, and leadership.

Shilpa Taufique, PhD, Chief of the Division of Psychology and Vice Chair for Faculty Development in Psychiatry, presented these awards at the 2026 Psychology Graduation.

“Our faculty are the foundation of our Division’s excellence, advancing patient care, education, research, and innovation every day. These Distinguished Faculty Award recipients exemplify the talent, dedication, and leadership that inspire our community and shape the future of academic psychology,” she said.

Distinguished Faculty Award Clinical Excellence 2026

A photo of Gregory Gagnon, PhD

Gregory Gagnon, PhD

Gregory Gagnon, PhD, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, exemplifies sustained clinical excellence through his leadership, expertise, and unwavering commitment to patient care across both inpatient and outpatient settings.

As the supervising psychologist on the general adult inpatient unit and in the integrated outpatient service at the Mount Sinai-Behavioral Health Center, Dr. Gagnon consistently provides exceptional care to patients with complex clinical presentations while maintaining a strong focus on ethics, access, and quality. He has expanded clinical services through the introduction of Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT) and other group treatment modalities, enhancing care options for patients.

In addition to his clinical contributions, Dr. Gagnon plays a vital role in developing the next generation of psychologists through his work as Assistant Training Director, overseeing a large externship program and providing outstanding clinical teaching and mentorship. His ability to seamlessly integrate clinical excellence, program development, and educational leadership makes him deeply deserving of this recognition.

Distinguished Faculty Award Education and Mentorship 2026

A photo of Elizabeth Ochoa, PhD

Elizabeth Ochoa, PhD

The career of Elizabeth Ochoa, PhD, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, has been defined by an extraordinary commitment to education, mentorship, and the development of future generations of psychologists.

Over more than three decades at Mount Sinai Beth Israel, and now at the Mount Sinai-Behavioral Health Center, she has provided visionary leadership of the Psychology Internship Training Program, guiding it through multiple successful accreditation cycles and fostering a training environment known for its excellence in clinical education, supervision, and professional development.

As Chief Psychologist since 2009, she has mentored countless trainees, junior faculty, and colleagues across all stages of their careers, earning a reputation for her generosity, wisdom, and unwavering investment in the growth of others. Her leadership was instrumental in ensuring the continuity and success of the training program during its transition to the Behavioral Health Center, preserving a strong culture of learning and mentorship. Through her teaching, scholarly contributions, advocacy for the profession, and profound impact on the careers of generations of psychologists, Dr. Ochoa has left an enduring legacy that exemplifies the very best of education and mentorship in academic psychology.

Distinguished Faculty Award Scholarship and Innovation 2026

A photo of Yulia Landa, PsyD

Yulia Landa, PsyD

Yulia Landa, PsyD, Associate Professor of Psychiatry, is a nationally recognized clinician-scientist whose scholarship and innovation have transformed the field of psychosis prevention and early intervention.

Through a highly productive, federally funded research program, she has developed rigorously evaluated novel and scalable interventions that improve identification, engagement, and treatment for individuals at risk for or experiencing psychosis. Her pioneering work—including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for clinical high-risk populations, Early Stage Identification and Engagement, and the ComPsych communication framework—has advanced both the science and practice of care, with widespread dissemination across clinical, community, and training settings.

Beyond intervention development, Dr. Landa has distinguished herself through her commitment to implementation, clinician training, and systems-level change, ensuring that evidence-based innovations reach the patients and families who need them most. Her national leadership, influential collaborations, extensive scholarly contributions, and extraordinary mentorship of emerging clinician-scientists have left a lasting impact on the field and exemplify the very highest standards of scholarship, innovation, and translational research.

Distinguished Faculty Award Leadership and Systems Impact 2026

A photo of Ashley Doukas, PhD

Ashley Doukas, PhD

Ashley Doukas, PhD, Assistant Professor of Psychology, has demonstrated exceptional leadership and system-level impact through her vision, operational excellence, and commitment to expanding access to high-quality behavioral health care.

As Clinical Director of the Center for Stress, Resilience and Personal Growth, she has transformed and significantly expanded a unique service dedicated to supporting Mount Sinai health care workers, their adult dependents, and other trauma-exposed populations. Under her leadership, the program has grown into a thriving multidisciplinary service, maintaining timely access to care while achieving outstanding clinical outcomes. She provides exemplary oversight of clinical operations, workforce development, supervision, and care pathways, ensuring that evidence-based practices are delivered with consistency and excellence.

Dr. Doukas has also demonstrated a strong commitment to sustainability and innovation, guiding the continued growth and financial viability of the program while contributing to scholarship that has advanced understanding of effective mental health interventions for health care workers. Through her leadership, teaching, mentorship, and dedication to supporting the well-being of the health care workforce, she has created lasting institutional impact and exemplifies the highest standards of leadership in academic health care.

Thinking of Stopping Your Antidepressant? Talk With Your Doctor First

A stock image of a man looking at a prescription medicine container

Antidepressants are a common treatment for depression. More than one in ten people in the United States take prescription medicine for depression, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

These medicines are now in the spotlight amid an ongoing debate over how well they work and their possible side effects.

In this Q&A, Amirhossein Modabbernia, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, explains how antidepressants can help. He also explains what you can do if they do not seem to be working, including how to talk with your doctor about stopping your medication.

“I think people should know that depression is real, common, and treatable, and that needing medication is not a weakness or a moral failure,” he says. “At the same time, antidepressants are not magic, and they are not the right answer for every person or every situation.”

How can antidepressants help people with depression?

Antidepressants can help many people. They may be most helpful when depression is moderate or severe, lasts a long time, or keeps coming back. These medicines can lower symptoms enough so a person can sleep, think clearly, connect with others, work, enjoy life, and start dealing with life’s problems again.

In my work with patients, people often describe the change by saying, “Something has lifted,” “I can think and function again,” or “There is a little more space between me and the depression.” Large studies do show that antidepressants outperform placebo on average, though the benefit varies substantially from person to person. Medication is not the whole answer for everyone. But for many people, it can create the mental and emotional space needed for recovery, therapy, relationships, and meaningful life changes.

A portrait of Amirhossein Modabbernia, MD, PhD

Amirhossein Modabbernia, MD, PhD

What if I am taking an antidepressant but do not feel better?

The first thing I would say is: Please talk honestly with your doctor. A poor response does not mean treatment has failed forever. It also does not mean you should stop the medicine suddenly. It is  important to have realistic expectations. Antidepressants usually do not create instant happiness. They do not take away all emotional pain. Early signs of improvement can be small. You may sleep better, have more energy, feel less weighed down, think more clearly, feel less irritable, or find it easier to get through the day.

What can I do if my antidepressant does not seem to be working?

If the medicine is not helping enough, that is useful information. It may mean:

  • The dose is not right.
  • The medicine needs more time to work.
  • Side effects are getting in the way.
  • The diagnosis needs to be looked at again.
  • Other issues are playing a role, such as sleep problems, substance use, medical problems, trauma, or major life stress.

Sometimes psyhotherapy needs to be added. Sometimes the medicine needs to be changed. Sometimes the whole treatment plan needs to be adjusted. The important point is this: If you are not improving, that is not a dead end. It is a reason to talk with your clinician and decide what to do next. If you feel worse, have side effects you cannot tolerate, or have suicidal thoughts, talk with a clinician right away.

What should I do if I want to stop taking my antidepressant?

Do not stop suddenly unless there is a clear medical reason and a clinician is guiding you. Stopping an antidepressant can be a reasonable choice. But it should be done with care. Before stopping, you and your clinician may want to talk about questions such as:

  • Why do I want to stop now?
  • How long have I been feeling well?
  • How stable is my life right now?
  • What happened the last time I stopped, if I stopped before?
  • What symptoms should we watch for?
  • How slowly should I lower the dose?
  • What is the plan if depression comes back?

Withdrawal symptoms are real. They can include dizziness, nausea, trouble sleeping, irritability, anxiety, vivid dreams, flu-like symptoms, and sometimes “brain zaps,” which can feel like electric shocks. This does not mean people should be afraid to stop. It means stopping should be planned. It should be done slowly, with a clear follow-up plan.

How do you decide if someone is ready to lower the dose?

I usually want to know if the person has been well—not just a little better—for a steady period of time. I also look at whether the person is functioning well again. I want to know if major stressors are stable, if the person has support, and if there is a plan to prevent depression from returning. That plan might include therapy, steady sleep routines, exercise, social connection, awareness of early warning signs, and a clear plan for what to do if symptoms return.

I also look closely at the person’s history. Someone who had one mild episode of depression is different from someone with depression that keeps coming back, or someone with long-term depression, suicidal thoughts, a history of hospitalization, severe anxiety, trauma, substance use, or possible bipolar disorder. Past attempts to stop medicine also matter.

Many guidelines recommend staying on antidepressants for several months after symptoms improve after a first episode. They recommend staying on them longer when depression has come back, lasted a long time, or been severe. So tapering is not only about preference. It is also about timing and safety. Is this a good time to try? And do we have a plan if symptoms get worse?

Are some antidepressants harder to stop than others?

Yes. Some antidepressants are more likely to cause symptoms when they are stopped, especially if they are stopped too quickly. In general, medicines that leave the body quickly can be harder for some people to stop. Examples include paroxetine, brand name Paxil, and venlafaxine, brand name Effexor. Fluoxetine, brand name Prozac, often causes fewer symptoms when stopping because it stays in the body longer. But every person is different. That is why the taper needs to be personalized.

Are there options other than antidepressants?

Yes. Antidepressants are only one part of depression treatment. Therapy can be very helpful. This can include cognitive behavioral therapy, also known as CBT; interpersonal therapy; behavioral activation; psychodynamic therapy; and mindfulness-based approaches. For many people, therapy is as important as medicine, and sometimes it’s more important.

It is also important to look at the full picture. Sleep, substance use, exercise, social isolation, daily routine, trauma, medical issues, and the person’s life circumstances all matter. Depression does not happen in a vacuum. For more severe depression, or depression that has not improved with treatment, other options may be appropriate. These can include transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, or ketamine or esketamine. The right approach depends on the person. It depends on the severity of depression, safety, past treatment response, preferences, access, and what is realistic in that person’s life.

Why should I talk with a clinician?

Good treatment should be a partnership. People should feel able to ask questions and speak honestly about what they are experiencing. Tell your clinician if your medicine is not helping, if side effects are affecting your life, if you feel emotionally numb, or if you want to stop taking the medicine. These are all valid things to discuss. The goal is not just to lower symptoms on a checklist. The goal is to help people return to a life that feels more livable, connected, and meaningful.

How Can I Manage Social Anxiety? Three Tips From a Mount Sinai Psychologist

Avoiding other people from time to time is normal. But if you isolate yourself out of fear of embarrassment or rejection, you may have social anxiety disorder.

Charissa Chamorro, PhD

In this Q&A, Charissa Chamorro, PhD, a Mount Sinai clinical psychologist, explains how to know if you might have social anxiety disorder and what you can do to be more confident around others.

“Treatment isn’t about getting rid of anxiety—it’s about learning you can feel anxious and still engage meaningfully. The more you approach instead of avoiding, the more confidence you build,” says Dr. Chamorro, Assistant Clinical Professor, Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

What is the difference between being shy and having social anxiety disorder?

Social anxiety disorder is a diagnosable mental health condition. Shyness is considered a personality trait that can be shaped by temperament and experiences. While shyness usually involves mild discomfort in social settings, social anxiety involves a persistent, intense fear of being judged, embarrassed, or rejected.

Unlike shyness, social anxiety interferes with your life. If you avoid situations you actually want to be part of or cancel plans because of discomfort, you may have social anxiety disorder.

What causes social anxiety disorder?

The causes are thought to be a combination of biological and environmental factors, but not necessarily due to bullying or poor parenting. Some people are more prone to anxiety, and experiences like negative social feedback can reinforce that.

What are signs I might have social anxiety disorder?

  • Avoiding social interactions: Not just avoiding parties, but isolating yourself at work or having a hard time starting conversations with co-workers.
  • Going blank in conversations: You may blame yourself—thinking, “Why can’t I think of something to say?”—but this can be part of your body’s fight, flight, or freeze response to anxiety.
  • Over-apologizing and deferring to others instead of stating your own preferences: People with social anxiety often seek social approval.
  • Rumination: Replaying past conversations, focusing on something you think went wrong, or feeling that you were really embarrassing. Thinking about social interactions is normal, but if it causes distress and is hard to control, you may have social anxiety.
  • Perfectionism: Feeling that you have to know the perfect thing to say before you can speak.
  • Hiding behind your phone in public: Not for work or enjoyment, but to avoid engaging with others.

How can I become more confident in social situations?

Here are three tips you might find useful:

  • Remind yourself that everyone feels awkward sometimes. That normalizes the experience and helps you feel less alone.
  • Vocalize your feelings. For example, if you’re giving a speech, you might say, “I’m feeling nervous because I really want this to go well.” Naming it can disarm others and help you feel more confident.
  • Reframing your thoughts can build confidence. Instead of telling yourself, “I’m so awkward,” tell yourself, “A part of me feels anxious, and that’s okay. I’m going to do my best.” Coaching yourself with more balanced, supportive thoughts can make a difference.

How can a mental health professional help me with social anxiety?

Social anxiety is highly treatable, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the gold standard. CBT helps you identify thoughts contributing to anxiety and use cognitive restructuring to examine them.

How does a therapist use cognitive behavioral therapy to treat social anxiety?

I would ask you to recall positive social experiences to challenge self-critical thoughts, like “I can never connect with people.” Cognitive behavioral therapists work on helping you create more balanced thoughts—for example, “Sometimes I feel awkward, but I’ve also connected with others before.”

Therapists also assign gradual behavioral exposures—small tasks like ordering coffee and making eye contact with the cashier, then building up to things like attending a party. The goal is to break the cycle of avoidance and create opportunities to approach social situations.

Are there medications that treat social anxiety?

CBT is often very effective, but if symptoms remain or access is limited, medication may be a helpful additional support. Depending on how severe your anxiety is—especially if generalized anxiety is also present—we may refer you to a psychiatrist to discuss medication options.

What happens if I continue to avoid social situations?

Avoidance makes anxiety stronger. When you avoid a social situation, anxiety goes down short-term, but you don’t get the chance to learn that you can manage it.

Treatment isn’t about getting rid of anxiety—it’s about learning you can feel anxious and still engage meaningfully. The more you approach instead of avoiding, the more confidence you build.