Emergency Room, Urgent Care, or Pediatrician: When and Where to Take Your Child and Tips to Help You Make the Right Decision

A young Black girl sits in an emergency room as two health care workers attend to her.

When your child is hurt or sick, it can be very hard to know where to go and when to take them to a doctor. It’s common for an eight-month-old’s fever to spike and not feel playful or for a two-year-old to refuse to eat and be cranky. Your reaction might be that it’s not a big deal, or maybe you decide to run to the closest urgent care. The right choice is not always obvious, and situations are not always clear-cut.

Hetal Patel, DO, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, and General Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and a pediatrician at Mount Sinai-Union Square, explains what is typically defined as an emergency room (ER) versus urgent care scenario, when it’s recommended to visit your pediatrician, and tips to help you make the right decision.

It’s understandable that parents sometimes fear the worst when it comes to their children and may choose to take a “better to be safe” approach. While many situations don’t require a trip to the ER or urgent care, there are cases that clearly require emergency or urgent care attention, and there are also cases that are less clear.

In general, you should take your child to urgent care for minor issues that need prompt attention and aren’t life-threatening, such as a common cold, a minor cut, a sprain, or ear infection. You should go to the ER for serious or life-threatening conditions like a high fever in a baby under two months old, trouble breathing, excessive bleeding, head injuries, or suspected broken bones. It’s important to understand that urgent care offers a more convenient, quicker, and often less expensive alternative to non-emergency types of care when you can’t get an appointment easily with your pediatrician. In addition, a visit to the ER is generally more expensive, and because emergency departments are designed to care for the sickest patients first, those with less severe illnesses will have longer waits. A visit to the ER can also expose your already sick kid to more germs and infections carried by ER visitors.

Here is a comprehensive list that defines when to go where.

Go to the ER for the following: 

Fever: A fever of 100.4F or higher in an infant under two months old is always considered a medical emergency. This is less of a concern in toddlers and older children.

Dehydration: Signs include no tears when they cry or very few wet diapers, especially when a child is not able to keep fluids down.

Breathing Problems: Severe trouble breathing (this includes fast breathing, retractions, head bobbing), bluish lips, or a severe asthma attack that doesn’t respond to standard treatment.

Bleeding: Ongoing bleeding or deep cuts or injuries that won’t stop bleeding after applying pressure for 5-15 minutes.

Head Injuries: Any type of head trauma with loss of consciousness, vomiting, confusion, vision problems, or difficulty waking up.

Burns:  A second or third-degree burn, or if the burn is larger than the child’s hand, is in a very uncomfortable place, such as the face, hands, feet, genitals, or a burn that wraps around a body part, such as the arm or finger, is an important reason to go to the ER. Other reasons include signs of infection, electrical or chemical burns, or signs of smoke inhalation.

Broken Bones: A bone breaking through the skin or multiple fractures.

Seizures: Any type of seizure activity with loss of consciousness, muscle spasms, confusion, or inability to arouse.

Allergic reactions: A severe allergic reaction or anaphylaxis with swelling of the face, lips, or tongue, or difficulty breathing.

Poisoning: Swallowing a dangerous object, including a button, battery, magnet or sharp item, food or poison. Please call the New York Regional Poison Control Centers at 1-800-222-1222.

Severe Pain: Any type of abnormal and intense, sudden, or severe pain in the abdomen or chest, especially if it causes a child to not move.

Go to urgent care for the following (or when your pediatrician is not available):

Common Illnesses: Colds, flu, other viruses, ear infections, sore throats, pink eye, etc.

Minor Rashes or Skin Irritations: Issues that are not part of a severe allergic reaction, including rashes, mild allergic reactions, or bites.

Minor Cuts: Cuts that may need a few stitches or can be treated without the need for extensive surgery or stitches.

Minor Burns: Burns without signs of severe or life-threatening damage.

Minor Sprains and Strains: Injuries that don’t involve severe pain or obvious deformities.

Lower-grade or Persistent Fevers: Fevers in children over three months old that don’t have other alarming symptoms.

Go to Pediatrician for the following:

Routine care, including vaccines, wellness visits, and check-ups.

Non-urgent or common illnesses, including colds, flu, other viruses, ear infections, sore throats, pink eye, etc.

Lower-grade or persistent fever.

Minor Rashes or Skin Irritations: Issues that are not part of a severe allergic reaction, including rashes, mild allergic reactions, or bites.

Stomach Issues: Mild pain, vomiting, or diarrhea without blood.

Tips to Help You Make the Right Decision

Here are some basic questions to ask yourself when deciding about your child’s health.

  • Is my child safe right now? (As in: Is my child breathing well, awake, responsive, warm, pink, or have a healthy skin tone?)
  • Could this get worse quickly?
  • Does this need evaluation/treatment today, or can it wait?

In summary, remember these quick tips:

  • ER = Life threatening or high risk
  • Urgent care = Needs care today, but child is stable
  • Pediatrician = Mild, ongoing symptoms, preventative

To make an appointment with a pediatrician at Mount Sinai-Union Square, call 212-844-8300.

How to Manage the Time Change

Changing the clocks by an hour can disrupt your sleep and leave you tired for a few days. It can also throw off your circadian rhythm, your body’s internal clock.

Andrew Varga, MD, PhD, a neuroscientist and physician at the Mount Sinai Respiratory Institute Integrative Sleep Center, explains how the time change affects your body—and what you can do to help adjust.

“In our Sleep Disorders Program, we research, diagnose, and treat sleep issues such as insomnia, sleep apnea, and changes in circadian rhythms,” says Dr. Varga. “And we know that twice a year, everyone experiences a pretty dramatic shift in their biological rhythms because of the time change.”

How does the time change affect your body?

Any time change, including travel to another time zone, can force your body to adjust its internal clock. Your circadian rhythm is a roughly 24-hour cycle that responds to light and darkness. It helps control when you sleep and wake, along with other body processes.

When your body clock does not match the time on the clock, you may lose sleep and feel tired. The time change is also linked with increases in heart attacks, strokes, and car crashes caused by sleepy driving.

How long does it take to adjust?

It depends on how large the time change is and your age.

For a one-hour clock change, most people adjust within a few days. Larger changes, such as travel to Europe or Asia, can take about a week. Older adults may need two weeks or more.

What can help you adjust before bedtime?

“There are several things that I recommend to patients in my practice,” says Dr. Varga.

Take a low dose of melatonin.

I recommend a dose of 0.5 to 1 milligram of melatonin, at most, about three hours before the bedtime you want. If you want to go to bed at 11 pm, for example, take it between 7 and 8 pm.

This dose is much lower than many melatonin products, which may contain up to 10 milligrams. A low dose more closely matches the slow rise in melatonin your body normally produces in response to cues such as light, food, and physical activity.

I don’t recommend a higher dose for adjusting your body clock. Some people take higher doses to feel sleepy right away, but it’s not recommended for long-term use. If you have been taking melatonin regularly, especially at higher doses, I suggest to my patients to take a break and use it only when you want to adjust your body clock.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia, a treatment that uses practical exercises and changes in thoughts and habits to support healthy sleep, may help during a break from melatonin.

Limit blue light at night.

After taking melatonin, try to reduce blue light. Avoid phones, tablets, TVs, and other screens when possible. If you still want to use screens, try a blue-light filter or blue-blocking glasses. The glasses can also reduce light from overhead sources.

What is blue light?

Blue light is part of the light that reaches your eyes. White light contains blue light along with other types of light. Many screens give off a higher share of blue light, even though you may not notice it.

Blue light is a strong signal to your body clock. That is why reducing blue light at night may help when you are trying to adjust your sleep schedule.

What can help you wake up after the time change?

“In the morning, light decreases the amount of melatonin in your body,” says Dr. Varga. “This is one of the cues, known as ‘zeitgebers,’ that help you wake up in the morning. To help this process, there are a couple of things I recommend to patients.”

Get plenty of blue light in the morning.

The morning is the time when you want plenty of blue light. I primarily recommend natural outdoor light, but if you awaken well before sunrise, I recommend blue-light boxes, therapeutic devices that emit small amounts of blue light, for adjusting the body clock.

If you travel often, especially between the United States and Europe or Asia, I suggest placing a blue light box on your kitchen table in the morning. You can eat breakfast or have coffee while the light shines toward your face for 20 minutes.

Use social and environmental cues

Light is the strongest cue that helps reset your body clock. But eating and exercise are other cues that can help your body know it is time to be awake. Morning meals and physical activity may help you adjust to the new schedule.

Should I Do a Monthly Breast Self-Exam? The Answer Might Surprise You.

A photo of a woman looking at herself in the mirror

Experts say monthly breast self-exams are no longer necessary—doing this less frequently is okay, as long as you know your breasts well.

Research has shown that recommending monthly self-exams hasn’t actually saved lives. A number of organizations, such as the American Cancer Society, have stopped recommending monthly breast self-exams, while others say doing a self-exam periodically can help women notice changes they may want to discuss with their doctor.

Experts agree the most important steps are getting an annual clinical breast exam and a mammogram every year after age 40.

In this Q&A, breast surgical oncologist Tara Balija, MD, FACS, explains some of the steps women should take to monitor their breast health.

“It’s important to know your breasts, because the earlier we find cancer, the easier it is to treat,” she says. “You can do a breast self-exam every so often to be aware of changes, but you don’t need to do it every month.”

Keeping track of your breast health is becoming even more important, she adds, as doctors are seeing more young women develop breast cancer, as young as age 20.

 

Should I do a breast self-exam every month?

You can, but you don’t have to, says Dr. Balija.  Research shows that a monthly breast self-exam doesn’t make much of a difference in terms of mortality. If anything, the studies found that women who regularly do self-exams end up having more biopsies that came back healthy. Biopsies are tests that analyze a small piece of breast tissue.

In response, many organizations stopped recommending that women examine their breasts every month. Instead, we recommend you check your breasts occasionally, to stay aware of any changes.

If I want to do a self-exam, what’s the best way, and when should I do it?

I tell patients the best time of the month to examine themselves is the first day after their period ends, when their breasts are the “quietest” and less enlarged from menstrual cycle hormonal fluctuations. The National Breast Cancer Foundation provides a step-by-step guide.

A photo of Tara Balija, MD, FACS

Tara Balija, MD, FACS

 

What should a woman do to maintain her breast health?

Once you reach age 40, you should get a mammogram every year and have a clinical exam by a doctor. This means your primary care doctor, gynecologist, or breast specialist if you have one. (Most women will have a breast specialist only if they’ve had cancer or are at high risk.) Having a child before age 30 offers some protection for developing breast cancer.

How do you know if you’re at high risk of breast cancer?

The best way to find out your risk is to get a lifetime breast cancer risk assessment between ages 25 and 30, according to Dr. Balija. There are several of these tools that you can find online. The Tyrer-Cuzick Model is the most up-to-date approach. This model looks at your personal and family medical history. Sometimes a woman is at high risk because of her family history or a genetic mutation. For others, it can be a combination of risk factors. Some doctors go through the assessment with each of their patients.

If the model shows you are at high risk, we can start screening early. We can, for instance, recommend an annual MRI in addition to a mammogram. This allows us to detect breast cancer at an earlier stage, when treatment is often more effective, says Dr. Balija.

When should women begin watching out for breast cancer?

I recommend women begin thinking about breast cancer well before they turn 40 and discuss this with their doctor. I definitely have more young patients with breast cancer than in the past. In our office, we see a few patients in their early 20s each year, Dr. Balija says.

Why are more young people being diagnosed with breast cancer?

The rates of breast cancer in young people have been increasing every decade. And these are women who didn’t have any family history or genetic mutation. That suggests that maybe we are all just more exposed to things that cause cancer, like processed foods and microplastics, according to Dr. Balija.  But we don’t really know what is causing this increase.

Advancing Skin Health in People With Down Syndrome: A New Clinical Trial Seeks Participants

A photo of Benjamin Ungar, MD, Director of the Alopecia Center of Excellence at Mount Sinai and a study investigator.

“Families often tell us that skin disease affects much more than the skin,” says Benjamin Ungar, MD, Director of the Alopecia Center of Excellence at Mount Sinai and a study investigator. “These diseases can be very uncomfortable to live with, and that can affect your confidence, sleep, school work, and participation in everyday activities.”

Researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Columbia University Medical Center are conducting a pioneering study to evaluate potential treatments for inflammatory skin diseases in people with Down syndrome. They aim to set new standard-of-care protocols for treating atopic dermatitis (eczema) and alopecia areata in this patient population.

For many people with Down syndrome, skin conditions can be more than an occasional irritation. Chronic inflammation, persistent itching, recurring rashes, and autoimmune hair loss can affect sleep, daily activities, social interactions, and overall quality of life.

Yet despite the burden these conditions place on individuals and families, there has been limited research focused specifically on treating inflammatory skin diseases in the Down syndrome community.

Now, Emma Guttman-Yassky, MD, PhD, Waldman Professor and Chair of Dermatology at the Icahn School of Medicine, together with Dusan Bogunovic, PhD, professor of pediatric immunology at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, are working on a National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored clinical trial examining a medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration, abrocitinib, for atopic skin diseases and alopecia areata in adults and adolescents with Down syndrome

“Given how common inflammatory skin diseases are in this population, particularly atopic dermatitis and alopecia areata, we want to ensure that safe and effective treatments are available, and that we specifically understand the effects that they have on the immune response in people with Down syndrome,” says Dr. Guttman.

Understanding inflammation in Down syndrome

Researchers have increasingly recognized that people with Down syndrome may be more likely to experience inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. Skin disorders, including eczema and other atopic diseases, can be particularly common and difficult to manage, often with higher levels of systemic inflammation in this population.

While many treatments are available for inflammatory skin conditions in the general population, there is still much to learn about how effective these therapies are for people with Down syndrome.

“Families often tell us that skin disease affects much more than the skin,” says Benjamin Ungar, MD, Director of the Alopecia Center of Excellence at Mount Sinai and a study investigator. “These diseases can be very uncomfortable to live with, and that can affect your confidence, sleep, school work, and participation in everyday activities. By studying these conditions more closely, we hope to identify treatment approaches that improve quality of life.”

The trial is designed to help answer important questions about inflammation, treatment response, and long-term management of atopic skin diseases in individuals with Down syndrome.

A study built with the community in mind

What makes this effort unique is its emphasis on community engagement, experts say.

Before launching the study, researchers sought input directly from people with Down syndrome, family members, caregivers, friends, and advocates. The study team believes that listening to those with lived experience is essential to designing research that is meaningful, accessible, and responsive to the needs of the Down syndrome community.

Why participation matters

Clinical trials are the foundation of medical progress. Breakthrough treatments typically begin with patients and families who choose to participate in research.

By enrolling in this study, participants may help researchers:

  • Better understand inflammatory skin disease in Down syndrome.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of this treatment in this population.
  • Advance scientific knowledge about immune-related conditions in people with Down syndrome.
  • Inform future treatment approaches and standards of care.

“Importantly, participation also helps ensure that people with Down syndrome are represented in research,” says Dr. Ungar. “Historically, many populations with unique medical needs have been underrepresented in clinical studies, limiting opportunities to develop evidence-based care tailored to their experiences.”

Looking toward the future

While no single study can answer every question, researchers hope this trial will be an important step toward improving the understanding and treatment of inflammatory skin diseases in individuals with Down syndrome.

“As the study continues, we remain committed to partnering with the Down syndrome community and advancing research that reflects the priorities of patients and families,” says Dr. Ungar.

Interested in learning more?

Email Giselle Singer, Clinical Research Program Director, at giselle.singer@mssm.edu for details about potential enrollment and research opportunities. Our team is working closely with the Down syndrome community to ensure participant experiences and perspectives help in the success of the study and future research efforts.

 

Could My Hair Loss Be Alopecia?


Hair loss—called alopecia areata—can be upsetting. If it affects you, you may feel as if you’re the only one, but it’s more common than you think.

In this Q&A, Benjamin Ungar, MD, Director of the Alopecia Center of Excellence at Mount Sinai, explains the condition, its risk factors, and who to contact for treatment.

What is alopecia areata?

Alopecia areata is an autoimmune disease that causes you to lose your hair, mostly on the scalp. An autoimmune condition means your body’s own immune system is attacking a certain part of your body. In this case, the system attacks healthy hair follicles. Alopecia areata often starts with one or more circular patches about the size of a quarter. Hair may disappear suddenly, over just a few days, or it may fall out slowly, over weeks or months, according to Dr. Ungar. This condition can spread to other parts of the body, such as the eyebrows, eyelashes, beard, and extremities. The condition is not linked to food. There’s nothing you should eat—or avoid—to prevent it. If you are an alopecia patient, you can eat whatever you want.

What causes alopecia? Who is most at risk?

This condition does not discriminate, Dr. Ungar says. It affects people of all ages, genders, and backgrounds. It often starts in childhood or adolescence but can affect those well into adulthood.

Alopecia areata can be triggered by a significant event, such as an illness or trauma, or it can arise due to genetics or a family history of eczema or another allergy. We see more alopecia areata in families of patients who have had the condition. We also see it in families that have eczema. While some people think it can be caused by stress, there is no scientific data to back that up. Alopecia is not contagious, according to Dr. Ungar. About seven million Americans have alopecia areata, including men, women, and children of all ethnic groups.

Can hair loss affect you emotionally?

If you’re feeling anxious or depressed over your hair loss, that’s not unusual. Hair can be an important part of our identity, Dr. Ungar says. And baldness—in patches or all over your head—can be devastating. It can make you feel self-conscious and unhappy about your appearance. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, people with long-term alopecia areata are at a higher risk of depression. So, if you’re feeling sad or uncomfortable about the condition, you are not alone.

Should I see a doctor if I think I have alopecia?

You should see a doctor as soon as you notice a problem. Some mild forms of the disease improve on their own, but most people need medical intervention, according to Dr. Ungar. I recommend seeing a specialist, because many primary care physicians don’t know how to treat alopecia. At the Alopecia Areata Center of Excellence at Mount Sinai, we have special expertise in diagnosing and treating alopecia areata and cicatricial alopecia.

We have found that patients with alopecia have more systemic inflammation than patients with other skin conditions, such as psoriasis or eczema. Over a long period,  inflammation that is systemic—affecting many or all parts of the body—can cause a number of problems including heart disease, arthritis, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer. Getting treatment early can help prevent alopecia from developing into these conditions.

How is alopecia treated?

The first step is to evaluate your symptoms and the type of cells that are causing the inflammation. Dermatologists will then use a variety of treatments, including systemic (oral or biologic), topical, and injected anti-inflammatory medications. “At Mount Sinai’s Alopecia Areata Center of Excellence, we are researching new treatments for the conditions, so we may be able to include you in a clinical trial,” says Dr. Ungar.

The Pros and Cons of Daylight Saving Time for Your Health

Photo of a woman looking out the window with her coffee in the early morning

Every March, on the second Sunday, we turn the clocks ahead one hour to begin daylight saving time, which gives us one more hour of light during the evening when the weather is warmest. And every November, on the first Sunday, we turn the clocks back to resume permanent standard time.

The disruptions to sleep patterns and the collective grogginess in the week or so afterward are discomforts that we’ve gotten used to. But does it have to stay that way?

In this Q&A, Andrew Varga, MD, PhD, a neuroscientist and physician at the Mount Sinai Respiratory Institute Integrative Sleep Center, discusses the pros and cons of keeping the clocks set permanently at daylight savings time or permanent standard time.

“The bottom line is that we can’t change the amount of daylight we get,” he says. “But we, as a community, can decide when we want those hours of daylight to occur.”

A portrait of Mount Sinai sleep specialist Andrew W. Varga, MD, PhD

Andrew W. Varga, MD, PhD

What are the health issues surrounding switching to daylight saving time?

Changing the clocks twice a year creates lots of problems, especially at the point of the time change. There are increased spikes and incidents of adverse health outcomes at those times of year in the spring and fall when we make the time change.

Twice a year, everyone is forced to make a dramatic adjustment in their circadian rhythm, which is your internal biological clock that governs key functions, such as your sleep/wake cycle, eating habits, digestion, and body temperature. It’s been documented that making the change has a number of adverse consequences, such as an increase in heart attacks and cardiovascular incidents at those times. And because people are sleepy, there’s a spike in the statistics in auto accidents, as well.

What are the alternatives?

It seems everybody is on the same page that we should stick with one thing, and not change it. But there are two camps—one is for making daylight saving time permanent, and the other is to stick with permanent standard time year-round.

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine believes we should stick with permanent standard time, which is what we observe in the fall and winter. They argue that permanent standard time is more in line with people’s natural circadian rhythms.

It’s worth remembering that we can’t change the amount of daylight in June or December, we can only decide where we want that light to be. The people who are proponents of permanent daylight saving time like the fact that in June you have light as late as 8:30 pm. If we were to change it to permanent standard time, you’d only have daylight until 7:30 pm. But you would gain it in the morning, so sunrise would be around 4:30 am instead of 5:30 am.

What would happen if we changed to permanent daylight saving time?

If we shifted to permanent daylight saving time in the winter, we would gain an hour of daylight in the afternoon but lose it in the morning. The sun would set at 5:30 pm instead of 4:30 pm, but it wouldn’t rise until 8:30 am. So most people would be getting up and commuting to work in the dark, and children would be going to school in the dark.

In addition, the further north you are, the more drastic the differences in the amount of light. For example, in Minnesota, the sun would rise about 20 minutes later than in New York City, at almost 9 am. In Miami, the sun would rise about a half hour earlier than New York—at about 8 am.

The United States did experiment during the energy crisis with switching to permanent daylight saving time. Congress passed the Emergency Daylight Saving Time Energy Conservation Act in December 1973, and at first, the public didn’t react that much. But as the consequences began to be felt over the course of the year, the public outcry was significant, and the law was repealed by the fall of 1974.

What is the argument for making standard time permanent?

Most medical authorities agree that sticking to standard time would be best from a health and safety standpoint. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine has released a position paper that says the twice-a-year time change “incurs significant public health and safety risks, including increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events, mood disorders, and motor vehicle crashes.” The paper makes an argument that standard time year-round would best align with human circadian rhythms. The time that we habitually wake up, go to bed, and do certain activities, such as commuting, is more in line with standard time.

It’s interesting to note that Arizona stays on permanent standard time and has done so since 1968. I’m not aware of any data that shows whether they are realizing any health benefits. However, they are routinely not included in national traffic accident statistics due to this fact.