Mount Sinai Researchers Play a Prominent Role in a Wide Probe Into Long COVID

RECOVER—Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery—is a nationwide initiative dedicated to understanding why some people develop long-term symptoms following COVID-19 infection. Recently, for the first time, the project yielded outcomes that are expected to help standardize the definition of long COVID toward these goals.

The researchers created a scoring system based on the symptoms that most clearly distinguished patients previously infected with COVID-19 from those who had not. Their work was published online May 25 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

“This initiative is driven by our shared vision to deepen our understanding of one of the most perplexing maladies of our times and to inform recovery and treatment of individuals who grapple with persistent symptoms following COVID-19 infection and learn why they do, so that we can find the most targeted solutions to help patients,” says Alexander Charney, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Neuroscience, and Neurosurgery, and Director of The Charles Bronfman Institute of Personalized Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Click here to watch an episode of Mount Sinai’s Road to Resilience podcast titled “The Long Battle With Long COVID.”

Of the 37 symptoms studied, 12 were identified that set those with long COVID apart: post-exertional malaise, fatigue, brain fog, dizziness, gastrointestinal issues, heart palpitations, loss of sexual desire or performance, loss of smell or taste, thirst, chronic cough, chest pain, and abnormal movements. Based on those symptoms, the investigators found that 23 percent of participants with a prior COVID-19 infection crossed the study threshold for long COVID.

“This is the first step of a series of studies that will be published using RECOVER data that will provide critical insights about the incidence, risk factors and pathophysiology of long COVID. This information will be vital for managing the large number of patients afflicted by this emerging condition,” says Juan Wisnivesky, MD, DrPH, Professor of Medicine at Icahn Mount Sinai, a clinical epidemiologist who is one of the primary leads of the RECOVER adult cohort study at the Mount Sinai site.  Dr. Wisnivesky is Chief of the Division of General Internal Medicine for the Mount Sinai Health System.

“Our overarching goal for RECOVER is to continue refining the definition of long COVID and to understand the biological causes of the condition. As a major hub for RECOVER enrollment and given the richly diverse communities that we serve—along with our grit—we are uniquely positioned to do just that.” — Alexander Charney, MD, PhD

The results were based on a survey in which 9,764 patients self-reported their symptoms. Next, data from the survey will be compared against lab and imaging results to validate the current findings.

“Until we establish a unifying framework to define it, it’s like we’re flying a plane without navigation,” Dr. Charney says when describing recent developments to come out of the Long COVID RECOVER multi-center study on which Mount Sinai is a co-author. “Defining long COVID in different ways will similarly get us varied answers. Only by creating a clear and uniform definition of long COVID can we accurately diagnose and begin the road to effective treatments. This study brings us closer to that goal of uniformity.”

On the hotly debated vaccination question—in another RECOVER study development—co-author Girish Nadkarni, MD, MPH, noted a preliminary signal in the data showing that being vaccinated was associated with a lower risk of long COVID. Dr. Nadkarni is the Irene and Dr. Arthur M. Fishberg Professor of Medicine, Director of The Charles Bronfman Institute of Personalized Medicine, and Chief, Division of Data Driven and Digital Medicine (D3M), Department of Medicine at Icahn Mount Sinai.

Mount Sinai colleagues in the Department of Psychiatry are leveraging RECOVER biospecimens to gain deeper insights into the cognitive and behavioral manifestations seen in long COVID.

Led by Scott Russo, PhD, Professor of Neuroscience and Director of the Center for Affective Neuroscience and Brain Body Research Center at Icahn Mount Sinai, the research will explore immune-mediated mechanisms underlying the emergence of depression and anxiety observed in this cohort. The work could inform the identification of biomarkers and enhance understanding of psychiatric symptoms associated with the disorder.

Dr. Russo and his team will also use RECOVER MRI data to measure changes in the penetrability of the blood-brain barrier associated with immune alterations and depression in long COVID.

Additional RECOVER brain initiatives, led by a team including Dr. Wisnivesky, Alex D. Federman, MD, MPH, and Jacqueline H. Becker, PhD, will conduct one of the first randomized clinical trials to investigate a potential therapeutic intervention for brain fog, a condition that affects many long COVID patients. Dr. Federman is Professor of Medicine and Director of Research for the Division of General Internal Medicine. Dr. Becker is a neuroscientist and Assistant Professor of Medicine.

Notably, Judith Aberg, MD, FIDA, FACP, the George Baehr Professor of Medicine, Dean of System Operations for Clinical Sciences, and Chief of Infectious Diseases, is a member of the RECOVER Pathobiology and Interventions Task Force. The task force recently published a white paper emphasizing the need for therapeutic interventions for individuals with long COVID. As the Principal Investigator, Dr. Aberg oversees the master contract for upcoming interventional trials sponsored by RECOVER.

“One of the exciting aspects of RECOVER is the collaboration of multi-disciplinary teams across Mount Sinai Health System engaged in interventional trials to improve the quality of life of those with long COVID,” says Dr. Aberg.

Sean Liu, MD, PhD, Medical Director of the COVID-19 Clinical Trials Unit, will lead a study evaluating the use of antivirals to treat long COVID based on the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 may persist in certain parts of the body and that a prolonged antiviral course may eliminate these hidden virus reservoirs.

Sarah Humphreys, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, will be the local Principal Investigator at Mount Sinai’s Center for Post-COVID Care. Other upcoming trials expected include interventions to improve cognitive function (the RECOVER-NEURO trial) and to address sleep disturbances (the RECOVER-SLEEP trial).

Mariana G. Figueiro, PhD, Professor at the Department of Population Health Science and Policy and Director of the Light and Health Research Center, is one of the Co-Principal Investigators nationally for RECOVER-SLEEP. The upcoming clinical trial will investigate the impact of light, alone and in combination with melatonin, on sleep in long COVID. The Center will serve as the core hub for this research protocol.

“Our overarching goal for RECOVER is to continue refining the definition of long COVID and to understand the biological causes of the condition.  As a major hub for RECOVER enrollment and given the richly diverse communities that we serve—along with our grit—we are uniquely positioned to do just that,” says Dr. Charney.

AI Spotlight: Guiding Heart Disease Diagnosis Through Transformer Models

Akhil Vaid, MD, left, and Girish Nadkarni, MD, MPH, right, are working to make artificial intelligence models more feasible for reading electrocardiograms, using a novel transformer neural network approach.

Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are often used by health providers to diagnose heart disease. At times, irregularities in the recordings are too subtle to be detected by human eyes but can be identified by artificial intelligence (AI).

However, most AI models for ECG analysis use a particular deep learning method called convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNNs require large training datasets to make diagnoses, which spell limitations when it comes to rare heart diseases that do not have a wealth of data.

Researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai have developed an AI model, called HeartBEiT, for ECG analysis, which works by interpreting ECGs as language.

The model uses a transformer-based neural network, a class of network that is unlike conventional networks but does serve as a basis for popular generative language models, such as ChatGPT.

Here’s how HeartBEiT works as an artificial intelligence deep-learning model, and how it compares to CNNs.

HeartBEiT outperformed conventional approaches in terms of diagnostic accuracy, especially at lower sample sizes. Study findings were published in npj Digital Medicine on June 6. Akhil Vaid, MD, Instructor of Data-Driven and Digital Medicine, was lead author, and Girish Nadkarni, MD, MPH, Irene and Dr. Arthur Fishberg Professor of Medicine, was senior author.

In this Q&A, Dr. Vaid discusses the impact of this new AI model on reading ECGs.

What was the motivation for your study?

Deep learning as applied to ECGs has had much success, but most deep learning studies for ECGs use convolutional neural networks, which have limitations.

Recently, the transformer class of models has assumed a position of importance. These models function by establishing relationships between parts of the data they see. Generative transformer models such as the popular ChatGPT utilize this understanding to generate plain-language text.

By using another generative image model, HeartBEiT creates representations of the ECG that may be considered “words,” and the whole ECG may be considered a single “document.” HeartBEiT understands the relationship between these words within the context of the document, and uses this understanding to perform diagnostic tasks better.

What are the implications?

Our model forms a universal starting point for any ECG-based study. When comparing our model to popular CNN architectures on diagnostic tasks, HeartBEiT ended up with equivalent performance and better explanations for the model’s thinking and choices using as little as a tenth of the data required by other approaches.

Additionally, HeartBEiT generates very specific explanations of which parts of an ECG were most responsible for pushing a model towards making a diagnosis.

What are the limitations of the study?

Pre-training the model takes a fair amount of time. However, fine-tuning it for a specific diagnosis is a very quick process that can be accomplished in a few minutes.

HeartBEiT was compared against other conventional AI methods on diagnostic measures, including left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, hypertrophic myopathy, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and was found to perform better.
How might these findings be put to use?

Deployment of this model and its derivatives into clinical practice can greatly enhance the manner in which clinicians interact with ECGs. We are no longer limited to models for commonly seen conditions, since the paradigm can be extended to nearly any pathology.

What is your plan for following up on this study?

We intend to scale up the model so that it can capture even more detail. We also intend to validate this approach externally, in places outside Mount Sinai.


Learn more about how Mount Sinai researchers and clinicians are leveraging machine learning to improve patient lives

AI Spotlight: Forecasting ICU Patient States for Improved Outcomes

When Can a Patient Come Off a Ventilator? This AI Can Help Decide

Delivering the Future of Vaccines With mRNA Technology

From left to right, Peter Palese, PhD, Horace W. Goldsmith Professor of Medicine; Miriam Merad, MD, PhD, Mount Sinai Professor in Cancer Immunology; Özlem Türeci, MD, Chief Medical Officer of BioNTech; Uğur Şahin, MD, Chief Executive Officer of BioNTech; Dennis Charney, MD, Anne and Joel Ehrenkranz Dean of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

One of the great tools that helped turn the tide of the COVID-19 pandemic was the use of vaccines, which prevented millions of deaths and hospitalizations in the U.S. and around the world. Key vaccines were those based on messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, which provide information for the molecules that teach the cells in the body to generate proteins used by viruses or cancers, allowing the body’s immune system to recognize and fight off future infections or transformed cancer cells.

The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai honored the efforts of executives of German biotechnology firm BioNTech, which partnered with Pfizer to develop and make available one of the most widely used COVID-19 vaccines in the country, during its 54th Commencement on Thursday, May 11. Uğur Şahin, MD, Chief Executive Officer of BioNTech, and Özlem Türeci, MD, its Chief Medical Officer, received honorary Doctor of Science degrees.

Research into mRNA technology for vaccines goes back to the 1990s, and has grown in leaps and bounds since, said Dr. Türeci in a guest lecture hosted by the Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, held separately from the Commencement.

The COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity for the technology to be adapted at a large scale, and the momentum gained and lessons learned was only the starting point to pave the way for greater heights for the development of mRNA vaccines, she said.

In this Q&A, Drs. Şahin and Türeci spoke about what the future of mRNA vaccines could look like.

After two years of COVID-19 vaccines:

  • An estimated 18 million hospitalizations were prevented
  • More than 3 million deaths were avoided
    Source: New York City-based foundation The Commonwealth Fund

Percentage vaccinated in United States by manufacturer:

  • Pfizer/BioNTech: 60%
  • Moderna: 37%
  • Johnson & Johnson: 3%
    Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

What are some active areas of research in which mRNA technology is being worked on?

Dr. Şahin: There are investigational cancer vaccines in which mRNA technology is being used to deliver instructions to generate antibodies or cytokines. This technology can theoretically be used to deliver any bioactive molecule.

Our focus at the moment is the development of cancer vaccines, and one special application of cancer vaccines we’re working on is the so-called “personalized cancer vaccines.” mRNA technology is particularly well suited to deliver a vaccine that consists of mutations of the tumor identified from the patient.

Dr. Türeci presenting to members of the Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute.

What is it about mRNA technology that makes it so well suited for cancer vaccines?

Dr. Türeci: We have been interested in cancer vaccines all along, and tried different technologies, and mRNA is the delivery technology that comes with its own edge. Its immunogenicity is very versatile and its transience has the potential to lead to a favorable safety profile. These characteristics are the reasons why we chose mRNA to deliver cancer antigens.

Any solid cancer could be appropriate for application. We have ongoing clinical trials in melanoma, head-and-neck cancer, pancreatic cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer.

Beyond cancer vaccines, we believe any bioactive cancer immunotherapy that is based on protein could be delivered by mRNA.

What about non-cancer diseases? Is mRNA technology suitable there?

Dr. Türeci: There are other areas, such as infectious diseases, in which mRNA could have an advantage. As long as you have the right protein structure to stimulate an immune response, you can theoretically also use mRNA here.

There are clinical trials in infectious diseases: COVID-19, for example, but also malaria or shingles.

What are some current limitations of mRNA technology? And how are researchers working to overcome those?

Dr. Türeci: We are very far advanced in the delivery component of the technology, and these advancements have made COVID-19 vaccines, as well as cancer vaccines in clinical testing, feasible. However, if you want to target specific organs, you need specialized, targeted delivery technologies.

For example, if you want to address something in the brain, you need a delivery technology that brings the mRNA into the brain. There may be monogenetic diseases in which the sample protein is deficient in the organ, and so limits how the mRNA can be expressed there.

So the lipid nanoparticle used to contain the COVID-19 vaccine, for example, might not be applicable for any other organs?

Dr. Türeci: This delivery technology was specifically designed and developed to deliver mRNA to the lymphatic system. If the mRNA needs to be delivered to different organs, it required new formulation.

When the public first became aware of mRNA technology through COVID-19 vaccines, there was skepticism. Do you envision similar skepticism as new mRNA vaccines roll out, and if so, how can we dispel such skepticism?

Dr. Türeci: Skepticism can only be addressed by transparent communication, through the disclosure of data, and proper education. I think there is a zeitgeist of skepticism. That skepticism isn’t necessarily specific to mRNA technology. But once they start to understand the mechanisms behind the technology, and the rationale of why we’re working on it, we can start to dispel it.

Do you foresee mRNA technology to grow exponentially into the future?

Dr. Şahin: Yes, mRNA vaccines could be really big, but it will happen slowly. It will take a few more years, but we are starting to see really promising candidates using this technology.

AI Spotlight: Forecasting ICU Patient States for Improved Outcomes

AI Spotlight: Forecasting ICU Patient States for Improved Outcomes

Girish Nadkarni, MD, MPH, and Faris Gulamali

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have seen increasing use in health care, from guiding clinicians in diagnosis to helping them decide the best course of treatment. However, AI still has much unrealized potential in various health care settings.

Mount Sinai researchers are exploring bringing AI into intensive care, and developed Spatial Resolved Temporal Networks (SpaRTeN), a model to assess high-frequency patient data and generate representations of their state in real time.

The work was presented at the Time Series Representation Learning for Health workshop on Friday, May 5, hosted by the International Conference for Learned Representations, a premier gathering dedicated to machine learning.

Hear from Girish Nadkarni, MD, MPH, Irene and Dr. Arthur Fishberg Professor of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the leader of the SpaRTeN research, and Faris Gulamali, medical student at Icahn Mount Sinai and member of the Augmented Intelligence in Medicine and Science lab, on what lay behind creating the model and what it could achieve for patients.

What was the motivation for your study?

A growing amount of research is indicating the need to redefine critical illness by biological state rather than a non-specific illness syndrome. Advances in genomics, data science, and machine learning have generated evidence of different underlying etiologies for common ICU syndromes. As a result, patients with the exact same diagnosis can have entirely different outcomes.

What are the implications?

In the ICU, representations of a patient can be used to guide personalized treatments based on personalized diagnoses rather than generic treatments with empirical diagnoses.

What are the limitations of the study?

In this study, we only looked at using one type of data at a time in real time. For example, we looked primarily at measures of intracranial pressure. However, the ICU has many types of data being output simultaneously. Future work hopes to integrate all the different types of data such as electrocardiograms, blood pressure, and imaging to improve patient representations.

How might these findings be put to use?

These patient representations are being combined with data on medications and procedures to determine how to optimize patient treatment based on underlying state rather than common illness syndromes.

What is your plan for following up on this study?

In this study, we focused primarily on creating the algorithm and showing that it works for the case of intracranial hypertension. In future studies, we would like to integrate multiple data modalities such as imaging, electrocardiograms, and blood pressure as well as intervention-based data such as medications and procedures to determine precise empirical interventions that lead to improvements in short-term and long-term patient outcomes.


Learn more about how Mount Sinai researchers and clinicians are leveraging machine learning to improve patient lives

Computational Neuroscientist Opens Doors for New Ideas and Talent to Thrive

When Can a Patient Come Off a Ventilator? This AI Can Help Decide

Yellow III Trial Finds That Lipid Lowering With a PCSK9 Inhibitor Could Benefit Heart Patients on Statin Therapy

Annapoorna S. Kini, MD, Director of the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory at The Mount Sinai Hospital, was principal investigator of the late-breaking clinical trial.

Even after high-intensity statin therapy, a considerable residual risk exists for heart attack and stroke among adults with coronary artery disease (CAD). A clinical study led by Mount Sinai offers strong evidence that aggressive lipid lowering with a proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i), along with a statin, can significantly reduce that threat and potentially help doctors identify patients who would benefit most from intensification of treatment to change their coronary plaque morphology and composition.

The findings were presented by principal investigator Annapoorna S. Kini, MD, Director of the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory at The Mount Sinai Hospital, as a late-breaking clinical trial at the American College of Cardiology/World Congress of Cardiology meeting in New Orleans in March.

The study, known as Yellow III, used advanced multimodality imaging to show favorable plaque characteristics after a 26-week regimen of evolocumab, including substantial reductions in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and total/HDL cholesterol ratios. More specifically, the investigation showed a significant increase in the minimum fibrous cap thickness (FCT) through optical coherence tomography (OCT), reduction in lipid core burden index at the maximal 4-mm segment (maxLCBI4mm) through near-infrared spectroscopy, and reduction in atheroma volume through intravascular ultrasound in angiographically nonobstructive lesions.

“By using all three modalities for the first time in a study of this type we were able to demonstrate a measurable improvement in fibrous cap thickness, as well as in plaque volume,” says Dr. Kini, Zena and Michael A. Wiener Professor of Medicine (Cardiology) at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. “In addition, blood samples were drawn to enable us to conduct a gene expression analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. This will help us uncover through ongoing research the molecular mechanisms responsible for beneficial changes in atherosclerotic lesions of patients treated with evolocumab.”

The investigation showed a significant increase in the minimum fibrous cap thickness through optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. Thicker fibrous caps are associated with more stable plaques that are less prone to rupture and subsequent adverse cardiac events.

Prior studies have established the ability of PCSK9 inhibitors—injectables that block PCSK9 proteins from breaking down LDL receptors—to reduce residual cardiovascular risk in statin-treated patients. As a result, the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines recommended the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with stable CAD if sufficient LDL-lowering was not achieved on maximally tolerated doses of statins. In the Yellow III trial, 137 patients scheduled for elective coronary angiography were prescribed maximum-dosage statin therapy for at least four weeks before undergoing multimodality intracoronary imaging. They were then given evolocumab (140 mg) every two weeks for 26 weeks and reimaged to assess changes in plaque morphology and composition.

The gene expression analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was a particularly important part of the Yellow III study because it could potentially lead to the development of biomarkers able to predict which patients would benefit the most from different approaches to lipid lowering. Researchers found that fibrous cap thickness did not improve in 20 percent of patients. The hope is that a genotypic characterization of patient response will ultimately reveal which patients should remain on statins, which should be put on a PCSK9 inhibitor, and which might benefit from combination therapy.

“We believe studies like ours can help physicians personalize therapies for their patients with coronary artery disease,” says Dr. Kini, a renowned interventionalist. “The first step could well be a recommendation for lifestyle modification, like exercise and diet. But it is important for cardiologists to know who could also benefit from the addition of a high-intensity PCSK9 inhibitor, particularly in the case of statin-treated patients with multiple risk factors.”

 

 

2023 Jacobi Medallion Award Ceremony

A group portrait of the 2023 Jacobi Medallion Award honorees joined by others attending the ceremony, including Dennis Charney, MD, Anne and Joel Ehrenkranz Dean, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and Kenneth Davis, MD, CEO of Mount Sinai Health System.

Seated, from left: Sandra K. Masur, PhD, FASCB; Talia H. Swartz, MD, PhD, MSSM ’08, MSH ’13; Lakshmi A. Devi, PhD; Marta Filizola, PhD; Jessica R. Moise; Swan N. Thung, MD, FAASLD; and Kenneth Davis, MD, CEO of Mount Sinai Health System. Standing, from left: Patricia Kovatch; Ramon Parsons, MD, PhD; Bruce E. Sands, MD, MS; I. Michael Leitman, MD, FACS;  Burton A. Cohen, MD, MSH ’79; and Dennis Charney, MD, Anne and Joel Ehrenkranz Dean, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

The Mount Sinai Alumni Association and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai presented accomplished physicians, researchers, educators, and administrators with the 2023 Jacobi Medallion, one of Mount Sinai’s highest awards. The annual ceremony was held Wednesday, March 15 at the Plaza Hotel.

The recipients of the Jacobi Medallion have made exceptional contributions to the Mount Sinai Health System, Icahn Mount Sinai, the Mount Sinai Alumni Association, or the fields of medicine or biomedicine.

View the digital program

Watch the In Memoriam video

Burton A. Cohen, MD, MSH ’79

Radiologist, New York Medical Imaging Associates

Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Watch a video of Dr. Cohen

Lakshmi A. Devi, PhD

Mount Sinai Professor in Molecular Pharmacology

Professor, Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Nash Family Department of Neuroscience, and Department of Psychiatry

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Watch a video of Dr. Devi

Marta Filizola, PhD

Dean, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

Sharon and Frederick Klingenstein/Nathan Kase, MD Professorship

Professor, Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Nash Family Department of Neuroscience, and Windreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Watch a video of Dr. Filizola

Patricia Kovatch

Dean for Scientific Computing and Data

Professor, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, and Pharmacological Sciences

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Watch a video of Dean Kovatch

I. Michael Leitman, MD, FACS

Dean for Graduate Medical Education

Professor, Department of Surgery, and the Leni and Peter W. May Department of Medical Education

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Watch a video of Dr. Leitman

Jessica R. Moise

Senior Associate Dean for Sponsored Programs, Grants and Contracts Officer

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Watch a video of Dean Moise

Ramon Parsons, MD, PhD

Icahn Scholar

Director, The Tisch Cancer Institute and Mount Sinai Health System Tisch Cancer Center

Ward-Coleman Chair in Cancer Research

Professor and Chairman, Department of Oncological Sciences

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Watch a video of Dr. Parsons

Bruce E. Sands, MD, MS

Dr. Burrill B. Crohn Professor of Medicine Professor

Professor and Chief, Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Watch a video of Dr. Sands

Swan N. Thung, MD, FAASLD

Professor, Lillian and Henry M. Stratton-Hans Popper Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Watch a video of Dr. Thung

Pin It on Pinterest