Mount Sinai Lab Creates Shared Database to Help Scientists Find Drugs That Can Be Used to Treat COVID-19

Avi Ma’ayan, PhD

As the public turns its attention to vaccine development in the hope of ending the COVID-19 pandemic, equally important work is taking place in the area of drug repurposing—identifying drugs already approved for other diseases that may also be effective for COVID-19. Repurposed drugs offer a safe and relatively quick and inexpensive treatment route.

At the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, a team of researchers led by Avi Ma’ayan, PhD, Director of the Mount Sinai Center for Bioinformatics and Professor of Pharmacological Sciences, is investigating drugs with the most potential. To that end, they created the COVID-19 Drug and Gene Set Library, a crowdsourced database and website that consolidates information from multiple labs around the world that performed in vitro COVID-19 drug screens. These in vitro tests are performed in a petri dish, which is the first stage in drug discovery, before the drugs are tested in animal models and then in human clinical trials. The website is available to all scientists who want to compare drug screen “hits,” and has drawn 2,000 viewers since it was launched in April.

“Drugs are just as important as vaccines and offer a solution for dealing with this pandemic,” says Dr. Ma’ayan. “The hope is that we’ll find a drug, or a combination of drugs, that people can take after they’re infected with the virus to block the virus from spreading and enable them to mount an effective immune response.” After all, he adds, not everyone may be eligible to receive a vaccine, based on their health profile, and even with a vaccine there will be people who get COVID-19 and need treatment.

Venn diagram shows some overlap in a set of drugs relevant to COVID-19 research

In September, the journal Patterns, a Cell Press publication, published an article that described the Ma’ayan Laboratory’s work on the project. The article described the lab’s machine learning approach, which explored approximately 200 “positive hit” drugs that were identified as inhibiting the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, from infecting human cells in vitro. Based on the shared biological and chemical properties of these drugs, the machine-learning model prioritized these drugs further and predicted additional compounds with similar properties.

“When you start synthesizing data from multiple studies, you look for consistency and seek to identify interesting mechanisms,” he says. “We want to understand the mechanism of action of those drugs. Why do they work? What are the pathways they affect? What are the targets of those drugs so we can better understand the lifecycle of the virus?” Currently, the laboratory led by Benjamin tenOever, PhD, Director of the Virus Engineering Center for Therapeutics and Research at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, is conducting experiments to further explore some of these questions in collaboration with Dr. Ma’ayan.

According to Dr. Ma’ayan, the COVID-19 Drug and Gene Set Library organizes information in a way that can be clearly summarized and reused at a crucial time in COVID-19 research, when time is of the essence. The library allows the scientific community to work together toward a cure and avoid promoting drugs that are not fully validated, which happened last spring with hydroxychloroquine.

“The website that we built is supposed to be unbiased,” he says, “and it looks at evidence in a way that offers consistency across the studies, where the right answer comes up in a more distributed, democratic way.”

When considering promising drugs Dr. Ma’ayan points to the example of HIV, a virus for which there is no vaccine, but many combinations of drugs that effectively keep the viral load very low and prevent new infections. These drug “cocktails” have helped improve the lives of many people around the world. “There are fewer people dying from HIV because of these drugs,” he says. “It’s not guaranteed we’ll have a vaccine for COVID-19 that’s 100 percent effective or even 50 percent effective, and there are people who aren’t going to be able to receive the vaccine. If people get sick from COVID-19 and you have drugs that can treat them, you could turn it into a disease that more people can recover from.”

Mount Sinai Leaders Explore COVID-19 Vaccines, Treatments, and the Path Ahead in Aspen Ideas: Health Panel Discussion

Does convalescent plasma therapy work? Is a successful vaccine for COVID-19 on the way? Will it be suitable for senior citizens and available to minority communities that were hardest hit by the pandemic? These pressing topics are explored in a recent Aspen Ideas: Health panel discussion that was led by Kenneth L. Davis, MD, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Mount Sinai Health System. Mount Sinai’s renowned vaccinologist Florian Krammer, PhD, and infectious disease specialist, Judith A. Aberg, MD, weigh in with informative answers to some of the nation’s most important health care questions.

“Many vaccine trials fail,” says Dr. Krammer, “but if you go with diverse approaches to creating a vaccine, it is very likely that one or even more of these will succeed.” With regard to convalescent plasma therapy, Dr. Aberg says, timing is everything. Administer the treatment early on before patients develop their own antibodies. Mount Sinai, she adds, is educating at-risk communities about the need for COVID-19 vaccines. When vaccines are ready to be administered Mount Sinai will be there.

To learn more about the most promising vaccines under development, why the infection rate in New York City is relatively low at this time, and whether we should be concerned about mutations to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, go to Aspen Idea’s Perspectives in Health.

New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, America’s First Specialty Hospital, Celebrates 200th Anniversary

From left: James Tsai, MD, MBA, President of New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai (NYEE); Daniel Laroche, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor of Ophthalmology; and Tamiesha Frempong, MD, Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Pediatrics, and Medical Education, were among those who gathered for the dedication of a portrait of David Kearny McDonogh, America’s first Black ophthalmologist and a former slave, who was trained at NYEE.

The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai (NYEE), in August, celebrated its 200th anniversary and its unique place as America’s first specialty hospital, which continues to provide patients with the highest level of care.

“As we enter our third century, we continue to innovate and lead in clinical care, education, research, and community service,” says James Tsai, MD, MBA, President of NYEE. “NYEE has really been ahead of its time and I think this is something we can be proud of in our bicentennial year.”

Indeed, the hospital’s remarkable history includes a significant chapter in American history and demonstrates the open-mindedness of its two young founders, Edward Delafield, MD, and John Kearny Rodgers, MD, who educated the nation’s first Black ophthalmologist, a former slave named David Kearny McDonogh. Dr. McDonogh’s professional path was laden with obstacles. After being allowed to unofficially attend and complete his medical studies at what is now Columbia University, he was denied his medical degree. But at NYEE, Dr. Rodgers provided him with the opportunity to become an eye doctor and practice his craft as a full staff member of the hospital, then located in a small suite in lower Manhattan. In a tribute to his mentor, Dr. McDonogh adopted “Kearny” as his middle name.

In August, as part of NYEE’s bicentennial celebration, a painting of Dr. McDonogh was hung in NYEE’s new surgical waiting room with a limited group of faculty and staff in attendance due to COVID-19 restrictions. No photos of Dr. McDonogh are known to exist. The painting by Leroy Campbell was commissioned by Daniel Laroche, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor of Ophthalmology at NYEE. At the gathering, Dr. Laroche called Dr. McDonogh “an American hero.” As far as we know, Dr. McDonogh is the only American enslaved person to have gained a professional medical education, says Dr. Laroche. “His story shows you cannot suppress the soul of man.”

Today, NYEE runs the nation’s largest ophthalmology residency program, with 10 residents a year, and continues to “look for the best trainees regardless of race, religion, ethnicity, national origin, disability, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation,” says Dr. Tsai. “We are open to new ideas and focused on training the most qualified individuals, and committed to recognizing the talent and skills of these applicants. We have an incredibly diverse residency class. Drs. Delafield and Rodgers believed in providing expert care to patients from all walks of life so they could enjoy good health and lead productive lives. That is so much in line with the philosophy of the Mount Sinai Health System—that same willingness to take care of everyone.”

In keeping with its tradition of innovation, NYEE in July became the first U.S. hospital, and third in the world, to acquire a microsurgical robot for ophthalmology and study its future use in patients. The device is expected to provide surgeons with a significantly higher level of precision when performing procedures. NYEE has applied to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for permission to use the robot for research and educational purposes and for clinical trials before expanding its use into retinal or other ophthalmic surgeries. Only two other microsurgical robotic eye systems exist in the world—in England and the Netherlands.

NYEE is also pioneering the use of telemedicine in ophthalmology by exploring new technologies and methods to permit eye doctors to make diagnoses using computers and artificial intelligence. The hospital is working with emergency room doctors and nurses within the Mount Sinai Health System to handle patients with eye emergencies more efficiently when an ophthalmologist is not physically present but is available remotely. The Emergency Department staff would conduct an eye exam and assist the ophthalmologist in making a diagnosis via remote diagnostics, rather than having patients wait a lengthy period of time before a specialist is able to get to the hospital.

Dr. Tsai says, “NYEE may look very different in our third century of service to the community. We will incorporate more telemedicine into our offering. We will also train doctors more effectively using the latest technology. But we will still possess the same ethos, culture, vision, and mission that have guided us since our founding 200 years ago.”

 

Men Hospitalized for COVID-19 Were Younger and Healthier Than Women Who Were Hospitalized

Men who were hospitalized for COVID-19 in New York City during the early days of the pandemic were both younger and healthier on average than their female counterparts, according to a new study by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. The study, posted to the preprint server medRxiv, analyzed the electronic health records of 3,086 racially diverse COVID-19 patients who were admitted to five hospitals within the Mount Sinai Health System on or before April 13, 2020, and followed through June 2, 2020.

“Just being male seemed to be a risk factor in and of itself,” says the study’s first author, Tomi Jun, MD, a hematology and medical oncology Fellow at The Tisch Cancer Institute of the Mount Sinai Health System. Members of Mount Sinai’s Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, and Scientific Computing and Data Science, also contributed to the study.

Of those requiring hospitalization, 59.1 percent were male with a median age of 64, vs. 74 years of age for women. While the men were more likely to have a history of smoking, the women were more likely to have pre-existing comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, and obesity. The mortality rate for men and women was equal.

Tomi Jun, MD

“This was during the early days when there was a surge of cases in New York and we did not have effective treatments,” says Dr. Jun. “Looking at the data, there were a disproportionate number of men being hospitalized. And these men seemed to be healthy enough to do well with COVID-19, because we know that older age and having more comorbidities are associated with worse outcomes. When you take all those things into account, being male seemed to increase your risk.”

Kuan-lin Huang, PhD, Assistant Professor of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, and the study’s senior author, says, “We know there are a lot of hormonal and immunological differences between men and women. There are certain genes on the X chromosome that are involved in the immune system and women have two X chromosomes. Women go through pregnancy, which can have strong effects on the immune system. And we know that women are at higher risk of developing an autoimmune disease. Likely, it’s a complex set of these factors that contributed to the results. Specifically what is it? I don’t think anyone knows for sure. But that is what we were trying to get closer to with this and subsequent studies.” Understanding the underpinning of why this is happening at the molecular level, he adds, will provide insights into potential treatments.

Kuan-lin Huang, PhD

The researchers found interesting results when they examined data about the patients’ blood. “COVID-19 is very inflammatory and all of the hospitalized patients had very high markers of inflammation,” says Dr. Jun. “But we observed that women tended to have lower markers of inflammation than men. We conducted exploratory analyses to look at how predictive these markers were for death and found that in some cases higher markers for inflammation were associated with higher risk in women than men. So, although women, in general, had less inflammation than men when they entered the hospital, having higher indicators of inflammation seemed to confer a greater risk for them.”

Dr. Huang says the current study is a jumping-off point for future investigations that was made possible by Mount Sinai’s policy of allowing its data and clinical scientists to access the electronic health records.

“If our hospitals hadn’t taken care of all these patients and we didn’t know their histories we wouldn’t be able to do this research,” he says. “We really hope this will lead to more precise patient management. We should have different considerations for men and women when we think about whether that may add on to the risk of a COVID-19 patient.”

Vaccines for COVID-19: How Protective Are They? When Will They Be Ready? A Leading Vaccinologist at Mount Sinai Weighs In

Florian Krammer, PhD

As the SARS-CoV-2 virus circulates throughout the world unchecked, researchers are racing to develop more than 135 vaccines. How well will these vaccines work and how soon will we be able to benefit from them? To answer these questions and more, Mount Sinai Today turned to a leader in SARS-CoV-2 antibody research, Florian Krammer, PhD, Mount Sinai Professor in Vaccinology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Dr. Krammer is an experienced virologist whose Mount Sinai lab is working on a universal flu vaccine.

What does the vaccine landscape look like?

Vaccines have been made in record time, and they use different platforms. Two candidates use RNA technology, which has never been used in a vaccine before. Typical vaccine development can take up to 15 years but this is now getting shortened to months. Right now, there are more than 20 candidates already in clinical development around the world. Five of these are being developed in the United States. This makes me happy because there is not a single vaccine that can meet the entire demand of the market and if some fail there are alternatives.

Do any of the vaccine candidates look promising?

I am very positive about what we are seeing so far. We’ve seen pretty encouraging results from preclinical models, the phase 1 and phase 2 trials. But none of this means anything yet because the proof will be in the results from the phase 3 trials. That’s where we will learn about the actual efficacy and safety. In terms of efficacy, I don’t think we will end up with a vaccine that gives us 100 percent protection from infection (meaning sterilizing immunity). But we do not need a perfect vaccine, and I am relatively hopeful that several vaccine candidates will lead to solid protection from disease. I think a vaccine will probably also dampen transmission. This will help people who aren’t able to get vaccinated or mount a strong response after they are vaccinated.

When can we expect to see phase 3 trials?

Phase 3 trials are already ongoing. I assume we’ll have pretty good data sets by late fall or early winter, especially from interim analysis of the phase 3 trials. It’s very important that we don’t cut corners in terms of safety or efficacy even if countries like Russia are licensing vaccines right now, and China is giving its vaccine to the military. We really need to see what the phase 3 trials tell us and we need to rely on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to make a judgment call and only license vaccines that are safe and that work even if they are not perfect in terms of efficacy.

What can go wrong in a phase 3 trial?

If you don’t see efficacy, you don’t go forward. A lot of other things can go wrong. Vaccines can trigger an unintended neurological issue or an autoimmune disease in rare cases. You wouldn’t see this in a few hundred people in phase 1/2 trials, but you would see one, two, or three cases in a few thousand people. An example of this happened in 1976, after an outbreak of swine flu among soldiers at Fort Dix, New Jersey, led to massive vaccination campaigns and increased cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Do we know how the vaccines will work in children or the elderly?

All COVID-19 vaccines tested so far in the clinic show relatively high but acceptable reactogenicity—adverse reactions, including fever and a sore arm at the injection site. Since there is often a lot more reactogenicity in kids than in adults, we need to see if that is also an acceptable level in children. In terms of age de-escalation, I’m not sure what the vaccine producers are planning for phase 3 trials. Typically, you would start testing in healthy young adults and work your way down in age. But if you see a safety signal that’s unacceptable, you may end up with a vaccine that is licensed for adults but not below a certain age group in children. I am not too worried about safety in older people but I am worried about their immune response. We know we have a lot of trouble inducing immune response with flu vaccines in older people and we even have special vaccine formulations for that age group. It’s not clear if we will run into the same problems with COVID-19 vaccines. Some of the phase 3 trials will include people in their 70s, up to 80, so this is something we should know about soon.

What could complicate the rollout of an effective vaccine?

Large-scale production is difficult, and a couple of front runners in this race have never produced a vaccine for the market. A lot of the technologies being used are new and there is little experience with scaling them up. Also, we don’t know who will get the vaccine first. Probably health care workers and high-risk individuals, but I would like to see a discussion about this and understand what the public thinks. Also, distribution and administration of that many vaccine doses needs to be coordinated well and will be a huge effort. You also have to take into account that there will not be instantaneous protection. You may need two shots, and it could take a few weeks to a month until you mount protective immunity. In the United States alone we will need 660 million doses (two shots per person). Globally, we will need 16 billion doses. It’s almost unimaginable how much vaccine we will need.

For One Mount Sinai Doctor, the Blast in Beirut Hits Close to Home

Photos showing the damage at Saint George Hospital University Medical Center in Beirut. Source: George Wanna, MD.

For George Wanna, MD, Chair of the Department of Otolaryngology at New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai and Mount Sinai Beth Israel, the recent deadly blast in Beirut hit very close to home, which is why he is working so hard to help the city where he was born and raised.

Dr. Wanna, who credits Mount Sinai with giving him an opportunity to become a doctor in the United States and who considers Mount Sinai a second home, has been in touch with colleagues in Beirut and has been working to raise funds, including establishing a GoFundMe account that has raised more than $60,000. A focus is helping Saint George Hospital University Medical Center, a leading hospital in Lebanon severely damaged by the blast.

“They are treating people out on the streets,” said Dr. Wanna, who is also Professor of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, and Neurosurgery at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. “We are just trying to see what we can do to help care for people in a community that is now completely devastated.”

George Wanna, MD

Following the blast on August 4, Dr. Wanna spoke with the hospital’s Chief Medical Officer, Alexander Nehme, MD, someone he knows who trained at the Mayo Graduate School of Medicine, who told him of the dire need for supplies and also passed along photos of the destruction, which the hospital has also prominently displayed on its website. The hospital says it evacuated 160 patients and the blast killed four nurses and 12 patients.

The explosion has also displaced hundreds of thousands of people in the city, and the home of Dr. Wanna’s parents, about a kilometer from the blast site, has been severely damaged.

Founded in 1878, the hospital is a nonprofit academic medical center owned by the Orthodox Archdiocese of Beirut and affiliated with the University of Balamand in El-Koura, Lebanon, about 60 miles north of Beirut. The hospital served patients through years of civil strife during the 1970s and 1980s and was expanded to 400 beds in 2004.

Dr. Wanna has also been working with Brent Stackhouse, Managing Director of Mount Sinai Ventures, to see if Mount Sinai can provide surplus medical supplies such as hospital beds, mattresses, and IV poles. Georges Naasan, MD, Medical Director for the Center for Cognitive Health and the Vice Chair of Ambulatory Operations and Quality for the Department of Neurology, is also helping to provide assistance to the American University of Beirut Medical Center, which is providing care for those injured in the blast. Dr. Naasan, a native of Lebanon, earned his medical degree at the American University of Beirut.

Dr. Wanna, a prominent hearing and balance surgeon and researcher, received his medical degree from Lebanese University.  He completed his residency training in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at the Icahn School of Medicine and a two-year fellowship in neurotology at Vanderbilt University Hospital. Dr. Wanna was an Associate Professor in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at Vanderbilt Medical Center before being recruited by Mount Sinai and returning to New York in 2017.

Dr. Wanna, an American citizen who was born in Beirut in the 1970s, spent much of his childhood in a bomb shelter in Lebanon during years of civil war.

“I am one of the lucky ones. Mount Sinai took a chance on me and gave me the opportunity to leave Beirut and achieve the American dream,” he said. “I will always be grateful. Mount Sinai will always be home to me.”

Pin It on Pinterest