Rehabilitation Therapist Rises to the Occasion and Delivers a Baby Outside The Mount Sinai Hospital

Aura Weltman, a senior clinical specialist in the Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance at The Mount Sinai Hospital

On Thursday, December 28, shortly before 8:30 am, Aura Weltman, OTR/L, SCLV, was walking on Fifth Avenue toward The Mount Sinai Hospital and heard a woman scream. Aura, a senior clinical specialist in the Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance at the hospital, looked around and noticed that the street seemed unusually deserted. The only people she could see were a couple walking about half a block ahead of her.

She was unsure who was in distress, but a second scream was clearly coming from the woman, who seemed to be losing her balance as she walked up the ramp to the hospital. Aura ran to her as she started to fall, caught her, and helped her to the ground.

The woman said “baby,” and Aura instinctively dropped to the ground to assist.

“I noticed someone standing close to the hospital entrance, and I called for him get help. I could tell that there was no time to wait,” she says, adding that the delivery took only a few minutes. “It was miraculous to have a perfect, beautiful baby boy crying in my arms. The mom was so brave and strong—her only concern was that the baby be wrapped and warm.”

Although Aura had never delivered a baby before, she had trained as an emergency medical technician through a summer program at UCLA after graduating from high school. She explains, “When I was 16, I was a passenger in a near-death car accident. As a result of this, I wanted to know what to do to help others in case of an emergency.”

Aura remained with the baby and his mom, reassuring her and caring for the baby until a team from the hospital arrived. “One of the security guards came out and took off his coat to wrap the baby. He also removed and unlocked my phone so I could advise my manager that I had a ‘minor emergency’ and would be a little late!”

She continues: “Once the teams arrived, they cut the umbilical cord. One team took the baby, and I began to help the mom to a stretcher. After entering the hospital and checking that both were okay (and checking on dad, who clearly did not expect this), I wished them well. By the time I turned around, the baby and mother were being wheeled away, and the team of medical professionals dissipated.”

Debra Zeitlin, who is Aura’s manager in the Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, was not surprised to learn about her efforts to help someone in need. “Aura’s actions and calm demeanor are no surprise to me or her colleagues,” she says. “Aura is an excellent, dedicated clinician who goes above and beyond for her patients on a daily basis.”

Aura was also recognized for her courage and compassion in the Mount Sinai Health System’s daily leadership huddle.

When asked about her courageous actions, Aura speaks about the influence of others. “I am so grateful to my parents and my community—they have always placed an emphasis on seeking knowledge and helping others. I am grateful for learning so much about compassionate care and excellence from many of my Mount Sinai colleagues,” she says. “The members of the Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, including doctors, nurses, therapists, and staff are hard-working, devoted, and creative; they honestly would have done the same. Our department is constantly involved in rebirth—working to aid those recovering from brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, and a host of other challenges—it may be a bit less dramatic but it is every bit as miraculous.”

Aura believes she was not alone during this experience. “I genuinely felt that I was being guided from above—all the training that I had received years ago flooded back. I feel lucky to have been placed there at the right time and fortunate to have been a part of such a miracle.”

What You Need to Know About COVID-19 and Other Respiratory Viruses Right Now

 

It’s that time of the year when everyone seems to know someone who is under the weather. Respiratory illnesses, not just COVID-19, have been on the rise.

Experts say your best defense remains the same: Keep up to date with your vaccinations, consider taking steps to limit your exposure to large indoor crowds and wearing a well-fitting mask at public gatherings, and talk with your health care provider if you are feeling sick.

New Guidelines Shorten the Time You Should Isolate if You Are Infected

If you have COVID-19, or another respiratory infection, health experts say you can return to work or school sooner. New recommendations from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggest returning to normal activities when, for at least 24 hours, symptoms are improving, and if a fever was present, it has been gone without the use of fever-reducing medication. (Previous guidance from the CDC recommended people who were infected with COVID-19 remain in isolation for five days.)

Now the CDC says that once people resume normal activities, they are encouraged to take additional prevention strategies for the next five days to curb disease spread, such as taking more steps for cleaner air, enhancing hygiene practices, wearing a well-fitting mask, keeping a distance from others, and/or getting tested for respiratory viruses. Enhanced precautions are especially important to protect those most at risk for severe illness, including those over 65 and people with weakened immune systems, according to the CDC. Click here to read more from the CDC.

Note: The updated CDC guidelines do not apply to health care facilities. Click here for the latest Mount Sinai visitor policy.

“It’s the season for respiratory viruses,” says Bernard Camins, MD, MSC, Professor of Medicine (Infectious Diseases) at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the Medical Director for Infection Prevention for the Mount Sinai Health System. “It’s no longer all about COVID-19. That is now just one of a number of respiratory viruses we need to contend with.”

In addition to COVID-19, health authorities are watching a number of respiratory viruses that are circulating: influenza or seasonal flu (there are actually two forms of it this year); respiratory syncytial virus (RSV); and the common cold (rhinovirus). Taken together, they can make for a difficult season for patients and health care providers alike.

A Spike in Influenza, COVID-19, and Other Respiratory Illnesses Can Lead to a Rise in Cardiovascular Complications

Mount Sinai cardiologists are warning about the risk of heart problems this winter. Click here to read more

For COVID-19, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene reports hospitalizations in New York had surged at the end of December to their highest levels in about a year, following a smaller upturn in September. But the numbers were about half of what they were during a surge a year ago, and they are about one-tenth of the number in January of 2022 during the last big surge.

Bernard Camins, MD, MSC

Vaccinations for COVID-19 and the flu may not completely prevent you from becoming infected, but they are likely to keep you from getting seriously ill and requiring hospitalization. For both of these illnesses, it’s not too late to get vaccinated if you have not already done so. The flu season typically extends until spring.

RSV commonly causes mild, cold-like symptoms in most healthy adults and goes away after a few days. However, for infants and older adults with pre-existing conditions like heart disease or lung disease, RSV can cause severe disease and even death. The CDC recommends the RSV vaccine for adults 60 and older.  The vaccine is also recommended for expectant mothers towards the end of their pregnancies so their newborns will have antibodies against RSV. The last preventive measure is a monoclonal antibody against RSV administered to newborns less than 8 months old.

Dr. Camins’ general recommendations for keeping healthy remain unchanged:

  • Those at risk for complications from respiratory infections may want to wear a more protective mask in crowded areas, such as riding the bus or subway or shopping. A surgical mask provides some protection but not as much as a high-quality N95 or KN95 mask.
  • Wash your hands frequently especially when you get home or arrive at work.
  • Individuals at high-risk should talk with their health care provider and have a plan for how to get antiviral medications if they become infected with COVID-19 or the flu, as these prescription medications must be taken within the first days of symptom onset. Those at high-risk include older adults, those with chronic medical conditions, such as diabetes, and those with reduced ability to fight infections, such as those being treated for some cancers.

Dr. Camins offers these additional key takeaways:

Staying home: If you are feeling very sick, you should stay home, especially if you have a fever. You may go to work when you’re feeling better, and you may want to wear a mask until your symptoms fully resolve to prevent infecting your co-workers. There’s no need for extended isolation at home as people were doing in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, he says.

Taking medications: Talk with your provider about medications if you become infected. Anti-viral mediations make good sense. Paxlovid™ (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) for COVID-19 can help adults who may be at high risk for more severe illness. Anti-viral medications such as Tamiflu® (oseltamivir) for  seasonal flu can lessen symptoms and shorten the time you are sick, and they can be helpful for those at risk of complications.

The new variant: The latest variant of the virus that causes COVID-19, JN.1, does not seem to be any more worrisome than others that came before it, and existing treatments work well against it. “We will probably continue to see more variants as the virus that causes COVID-19 mutates,” says Dr. Camins. “You just have to accept there is always going to be a new variant.”

First Gene Therapies Approved for Sickle Cell Disease: What Do They Spell for Patients?

In December 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced its approval of two gene therapies for sickle cell disease—the first of their kind for the condition.

Casgevy™ (exagamglogene autotemcel), a cell-based gene therapy developed by CRISPR Therapeutics using its CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology, was approved for use in patients 12 years and older with recurrent vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs). Lyfgenia™ (lovotibeglogene autotemcel), also a cell-based gene therapy by bluebird bio, was similarly approved for treating patients 12 and up with a history of VOCs; it uses a lentiviral vector for genetic modifications.

“This is absolutely a development that physicians treating sickle cell disease are excited about,” says Jeffrey Glassberg, MD, Professor of Emergency Medicine, and Medicine (Hematology and Medical Oncology), at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and Director of the Mount Sinai Center for Sickle Cell Disease.

For a long time, sickle cell disease could only be cured with a bone marrow transplant, but that procedure involves challenges, starting with finding a match and also including the potential for complications, Dr. Glassberg says. “With these gene therapies, we’re taking stem cells from your own blood and taking it to a manufacturing facility to edit the DNA. When we give the stem cells back, you begin making new blood that’s yours without sickle cell disease,” he says. “This resolves a lot of the limitations of a bone marrow transplant.”

How do Casgevy and Lyfgenia work in curing sickle cell disease, and how do they differ from bone marrow transplants? Dr. Glassberg explains in this Q&A.

What goes on in a bone marrow transplant?

So with bone marrow transplant, you need a match. You need somebody to donate the bone marrow. While it’s unlike an organ transplant—where you’re waiting for an organ to become available either through a donation or after someone dies—there is a registry where people are willing to donate. However, finding a 100 percent match is tricky. If you’re lucky, you might have a sibling where their marrow matches perfectly. If not, it’s a rigorous search through this registry.

We can do bone marrow transplants with only half-matches, but those don’t work as well. And even for well-matched transplants, there remains the risk of developing a complication called graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). That is a condition where the donor immune cells recognize the host as foreign and attack the recipient’s body cells. GvHD can be pretty common—occurring in about 50 percent of cases—but only a small percentage turn into catastrophic GvHD.

Jeffrey Glassberg, MD, Director of the Mount Sinai Center for Sickle Cell Disease

What is sickle cell disease?

Sickle cell disease is a group of inherited blood disorders, where a mutation in hemoglobin—a protein in red blood cells that delivers oxygen to tissues—causes the red blood cells to develop a sickle shape. These sickled cells can restrict blood flow in blood vessels and deliver oxygen inefficiently, which can cause pain or organ damage—also known as vaso-occlusive crises. This condition affects approximately 100,000 people in the United States and is most common in Black people. Even with good management, the life expectancy of a person with sickle cell disease is around 50 years

How do the gene therapies avoid these issues?

With the gene therapies, the patient is essentially still going through a bone marrow transplant. The individual still receives a large amount of toxic chemotherapy to kill off existing stem cells, and receives new cells. However, the difference is that it is your own stem cells taken out and fixed. You are donating marrow to yourself, so it will always be a 100 percent match when reintroduced to your body and would not attack the host.

What are the technology differences behind the two gene therapies?

Casgevy uses CRISPR/Cas9, which is basically a protein discovered from bacteria that can cut tiny pieces out of your DNA. The therapy uses CRISPR to turn down a gene called BCL11A, which suppresses the production of fetal hemoglobin after babies are born and activates beta hemoglobin, which is affected by the sickle-cell mutation. By turning down that gene, the patient stops making adult hemoglobin and switches to making fetal hemoglobin.

Lyfgenia uses a lentivirus to create a so-called transgene. The lentivirus drops in a whole gene which contains instructions for producing functional hemoglobin. This approach produces a type of hemoglobin called HbAT87Q, which works even better than regular adult hemoglobin and can be identified with a lab test. The differentiation is helpful in telling exactly how well the gene therapy is working by the amount of HbAT87Q.

In a way, for both fetal hemoglobin and HbAT87Q, they work slightly better than regular hemoglobin for adults with sickle cell disease. Both have similar or slightly better oxygen-binding affinity, and each possesses “anti-sickling” globins that limit or inhibit hemoglobin S levels, which are tied to the sickling of red blood cells.

Are these gene therapies available at Mount Sinai?

Yes, we’ll be doing the therapies starting in late February. We’ve got four patients approved already, and have a list of dozens of people who are being evaluated. You can make an appointment at the Mount Sinai Sickle Cell Disease Center.

To call Mount Sinai Sickle Cell Disease Center
212-241-3650

What goes into the process of receiving these therapies?

It’s a long road. It starts with a visit at a sickle cell disease center. If the physicians have not identified any big reasons why you should not be a candidate, you’ll be referred to a gene therapy team—these doctors also work with bone marrow transplants. They will ensure any medical issues before and after the therapy are accounted for.

Administrative and finance teams will work with you to ensure these therapies are covered. These are expensive products—about $2 million or so—and each gene therapy is an individual negotiation and contract between the insurance company and drug company.

If everything is approved, you’ll make an appointment to come into the hospital for a procedure called apheresis. It’s almost like dialysis, where you’re hooked up to a machine. Your blood is pulled into the machine where stem cells are extracted over a period of about six hours. The stem cells are sent off to a manufacturing facility where the drug company does the gene therapy. This could take up to six months.

When the product is ready, you’ll check into the hospital again. You’ll be given chemotherapy to kill off all the stem cells in your body that make blood. Once all the stem cells are gone, a bag containing the gene therapy gets transfused into you, and the modified cells find their way back into the bones and start making blood that doesn’t have sickle cell disease.

Similar to a bone marrow transplant, you’ll be in the hospital for four to six weeks, because you have no immune system following the transfusion, and the product takes about a month to get into your body. This would be the biggest danger period of the whole process. But after that, you leave the hospital pretty much cured of sickle cell disease, though you might have to come back for several checkups.

What are some risks associated with the gene therapies?

Like in bone marrow transplant, the involvement of chemotherapy does carry a small risk of death. And there is a small risk of secondary cancers from the chemotherapy. It is very likely a person opting for this therapy might not be able to have children afterward unless you preserve your eggs or sperm. After the therapy, you would have to be careful for a while because your immune system is still reconstituting itself, and a simple case of influenza can make you much sicker than it normally would.

Who might be ideal for this sort of therapy?

The sickest of patients would be too frail to undergo chemotherapy, and a patient with mild disease wouldn’t find the risk-benefit attractive. It would essentially be someone with severe disease who isn’t responding well to current available drugs, but is strong enough to undertake the risk of chemotherapy to not have sickle cell disease anymore.

In adult medicine, we have moved away from paternalism, so our approach is: if you have sickle cell disease, and you understand the procedure, risks, and alternatives, and you still want to opt for the gene therapy, we will support you and do our best to help you succeed. It’s a shared decision-making process with the patient to make sure they understand what they’re getting themselves into.

In children for whom this therapy is appropriate, it’s a different approach. It’s more a medicine-based approach, where you only reach for the extreme care when you’ve exhausted all other options and you can say with relative certainty that the child would otherwise be certain to experience bad outcomes. An example would be if a child had had a stroke after maximal treatment and continued to have another stroke, then a transplant or gene therapy could be considered.

There might be many who would not opt for this, given that there are many good treatments that could help manage the condition, as well as more drugs in development. But these gene therapies open up options for a tremendous number of people. They are a cure for sickle cell disease as much as a bone marrow transplant is considered a cure. We know from bone marrow transplant patients who have lived decades after the procedure that the benefit continues to be a durable effect for the rest of their life. While we can’t predict how patients will fare decades down the road, since the first patients for these gene therapies got them in 2014, we are hopeful they will see similar durable benefit as well.

Preparing Physicians to Treat the LGBTQI+ Community With Dignity as It Ages

Noelle Marie Javier, MD, left, with Roy Noy, MD, during Dr. Noy’s four-month observership at Mount Sinai to learn more about LGBTQI+ medicine and geriatrics.

The field of LGBTQ+ medicine has slowly been developing over the past decade, but a crucial intersection with a subspecialty has often been overlooked—geriatric medicine.

Throughout history, LGBTQI+ medicine has been underdeveloped and under-prioritized for several reasons, among them being that few people were historically willing to disclose and seek care as LGBTQI+ individuals, and that many members in the community lost their lives to the HIV/AIDS epidemic during the 1980s.

“There have been gaps in training at medical schools, residency, and fellowship training programs from the past until now,” says Noelle Marie Javier, MD, Associate Professor of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, and Medical Education, at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Across the majority of MD programs throughout the country, the average time devoted to training in LGBTQI+ medicine is about five hours in total across the four-year program, as cited in a 2011 JAMA paper. “That’s simply not enough,” says Dr. Javier.

These days, with increasing acceptance and awareness of diverse sexual orientations and gender identities in society, and modern advances in medicine, LGBTQI+ people are growing older and living longer—some with unique health concerns and disparities. These could include how older adults living with HIV are aging, or long-term effects of having received marginalized care or faced barriers to care. “Now, more than ever, we need to be prepared as physicians and allied health professionals to take care of them in a way that’s culturally humble, sensitive, and responsive,” Dr. Javier says.

The Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine at Mount Sinai is committed to providing inclusive and affirming care for older LGBTQI+ adults, which includes training and education for staff, students and trainees. Inspired by this work, the leadership at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Ichilov) reached out to the Mount Sinai LGBTQ+ Medicine Fellowship program to arrange a pilot program where a resident in geriatrics could gain knowledge and training through an observership for the care for older LGBTQI+ adults. During the fall of 2023, Roy Noy, MD, chief geriatrics resident at Ichilov, collaborated with Dr. Javier in expanding his geriatrics skills and developing a curriculum that he could use to train staff back in Tel Aviv.

Read more about Dr. Noy’s observership at Mount Sinai and the importance of focusing on geriatric LGBTQI+ medicine.

Dr. Noy is helping the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Ichilov) set up an LGBTQI+ clinic for older adults. He spent four months at Mount Sinai observing various models of care in geriatrics and LGBTQI+ medicine.

How did this program come about?

Dr. Noy: We are trying to establish an LGBTQI+ service for older adults in our hospital at Tel Aviv. The head of the program, Roy Zucker, MD, was the inaugural fellow at the Mount Sinai LGBTQ+ Medicine Fellowship. He came up with the idea of trying to establish an observership for me to learn more from Mount Sinai about what is needed to start such a specialized service.

Dr. Javier: I was invited to be a plenary speaker at GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBTQI+ Equality last year when Dr. Zucker and I first got acquainted. He wanted to set up a collaboration for one of his residents in the hopes of expanding his medical knowledge and clinical skills to take care of older LGBTQI+ adults.

What went into this observership?

Dr. Noy: The program had several parts to it.

  • On the broader geriatrics side, I did a lot of observing with different doctors and other team members working in the Brookdale Department Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, and I joined them on their daily rounds. I also got to join the departmental educational programs.
  • For the LGBTQI+ medicine side, I observed Antonio Urbina, MD, Medical Director of Mount Sinai’s Institute for Advanced Medicine, in the HIV clinic. I got to train in Mount Sinai’s Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery with Joshua Safer, MD, who is Executive Director of the Center. And I also got to shadow Angela Condo, MD, Assistant Professor of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, in the geriatrics clinic for people living with HIV.
  • In addition, I was connected with people and organizations who play an important role in LGBTQI+ health, such as SAGE, an advocacy and services group for LGBTQI+ elders, and MJHS Hospice and Palliative Care.
  • On the training side, I was connected to Mount Sinai’s Office for Diversity and Inclusion, to see what they are doing for new and current employees, how they are implenting sexual orientation and gender identity data gathering, and how the Health System connects with the LGBTQI+ community.
  • There was also an academic side where I got to work with Dr. Javier on writing a chapter focused on affirming care, and we have an ongoing project concerning educational training programs.

Dr. Javier: The idea was to expose Dr. Noy to different models of care within the geriatric and palliative medicine landscapes—not just inpatient geriatrics and palliative care, but also neurology and memory care, outpatient clinics, urgent care, and chronic illnesses. By the time we were done with the observership, we had developed several deliverables, including submitting a chapter titled “Affirming Care for LGBTQ+ Patients” to Clinics in Geriatric Medicine that is currently in process for publication, and a scoping review research project titled “A Scoping Review Protocol of Educational Training Programs in Medical and Health-Related Professions Caring for Older LGBTQI+ Adults, November 2023 to Present.”

What were your takeaways?

Dr. Noy: Now that we’re starting our own LGBTQI+ older-adults service here in Tel Aviv, having been at Mount Sinai has helped us figure out what we need to focus on, as well as what are topics unique to us.

One big thing I learned is about communication in the way we address the community. It is important for everyone in the medical field, but it’s especially important in geriatrics because we do need to see the full picture of the person sitting in front of us and understand where they’re coming from. That involves knowing what are things that had been problematic, the history of what had been in the way of them getting treatment, and you can’t do that without good communication.

I also learned that connection with the community is important if we are going to be successful. The way community organizations work with health care in New York, I want us to be able to work as closely knit with them like that too.

Dr. Javier: I like mentoring people who want to be trained in LGBTQI+ medicine and health care. But just as I had helped Dr. Noy with his training, he had helped me too. Prior to this observership, I had several ideas in mind about developing a curriculum, but when Dr. Noy arrived and we started talking about what the program should look like, it helped to create more concrete ideas. I learned a lot from him in terms of what the community is like in Israel and what health services are available to them.

The amazing thing that came from this was: I want this same enriching experience for my fellows here in the department. We have 30-plus fellows in the department and are the largest ACGME-accredited fellowship program in geriatrics and palliative medicine in the country, but creating a LGBTQI+-focused curriculum had been on the back burner for quite some time. There is no formalized curriculum as of yet. This observership catalyzed the need to start working on this curriculum and make it a priority. In some serendipitous way, I got the outcome—a formalized program—before I got the template, and now I’m tracing our steps back of what we did and achieved in this pilot trial.

Why is it important that we focus on training physicians to care for LGBTQI+ older adults now?

Dr. Noy: Similar to the United States, in Israel, older LGBTQ+ people were less likely to identify as such than younger people. And we know that the LGBTQ+ population tend to face more barriers to accessing health care than the general population—this could include avoiding seeking treatment because of previous bad experiences, or even just from stigma.

As they age, the problems could accumulate, and they might end up needing more comprehensive treatment, when they could have preventive treatments earlier. There are general things like cancer, hypertension, or diabetes surveillance that could be done earlier, but there are also conditions more likely within the LGBTQI+ community, such as depression and mental health, that could get ignored.

Then there’s the fact that thanks to advances in medicine, we now have people with HIV living to old ages—even into their 80s and beyond. There’s still so much we don’t know about how they age, such as cognitive decline, frailty, effects of polypharmacy, and more. It’s not just about managing their medication, but also understanding their wellness as a whole. It’s important that we start integrating that training from medical school onwards. And also that we work with the community to show that we do exist—we’re here for everyone in the community.

Dr. Javier: When I was training as a fellow, I was not trained in LGBTQI+ medicine. Even today, that’s still not the case in many institutions. We need to change that and fast. The fellows in my department are knowledgeable enough to be able to take care of the needs of patients and be culturally responsive, but competencies around optimal LGBTQI+ medical care is not a requirement for them to graduate. The integration of LGBTQI+ care should be reflexive in geriatrics and palliative care curriculums across the country.

There continues to be a lot of disparities and inequities in care, especially for older LGBTQI+ adults and people of color. According to the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey, 40 percent of respondents have attempted suicide in their lifetime. There are many other unique health concerns in the community, and if you did not ask about the sexual orientation and gender identity of a person, you can miss out on the big picture of why they’re seeking care in the first place while being clouded by our own biases and prejudices in helping them.

Read more about how Mount Sinai is empowering health care for LGBTQI+ communities

The Importance of Affirming LGBTQI+ Health

How to Find an LGBTQI+ Experienced Medical Provider and Why That’s Important

How Does Heart Disease Affect Women?

Roxana Mehran, MD

Heart disease is the leading cause of death for women in the United States. Unfortunately, awareness about this fact remains low, with many believing breast cancer is the leading cause of death for women. Underestimation of heart disease risk in women has been an issue not only among women themselves but also among the health care community. However, positive change has occurred, with numerous campaigns and initiatives to increase women’s heart health awareness over recent years.

In this Q&A, Roxana Mehran, MD, Director of Interventional Cardiovascular Research and Clinical Trials at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and a world leader in women’s cardiovascular health, explains why it is important for women to know more about heart disease and to take control over their health.

What are the risk factors for heart disease?

Important and well-known risk factors for heart disease in women and men include high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes. However, there is increasing evidence about risk factors that exclusively affect women. For example, certain conditions related to pregnancy have been associated with the development of heart disease later on in life. These include high blood pressure or elevated blood sugar during pregnancy and delivery of a smaller baby than usual for the number of weeks of pregnancy. Women are also more likely than men to be affected by risk factors that are still underrecognized, such as depression, abuse, and intimate partner violence. And lastly, women are overrepresented among those living in less wealthy areas with less access to healthy food, exercise, and education, resulting in increased risk for heart disease.

Are there other differences in heart disease between women and men?

Yes. The underlying mechanisms of certain aspects of heart disease differ between women and men. Unfortunately, most of our study data on heart disease are derived from male populations. Therefore, diagnosis and treatment of heart disease are mainly based on data from male patients. Luckily, the differences in heart disease between women and men have gained the attention of researchers and become the focus of an increasing number of research studies. Although scientific evidence on the optimal diagnosis and treatment of heart disease in women is increasing, we still have a lot to learn about why and how heart disease develops and presents differently in women and men.

What are the signs of heart disease in women?

When there is insufficient blood supply to the heart muscle due to a blocked artery or other reasons, the most common symptom will be chest pain. However, the limited blood flow to the heart muscle can also cause other symptoms, such as extreme fatigue, nausea, and pain in the jaw, neck, and shoulder. These can be signs of a heart attack and are more commonly observed in women compared to men.

Is heart disease preventable?

The good news is that healthy lifestyle changes can prevent 80 percent of premature heart attacks and strokes. A healthy diet, regular exercise, and not using tobacco products (including vaping) are key to lowering your heart disease risk. In addition, screening and treatment of risk factors such as the ones mentioned above are essential to keep your heart healthy. Therefore, at Mount Sinai, we provide women with a comprehensive assessment of their heart health and heart disease risk. We help with initiating the important steps to a healthy lifestyle and recognizing and addressing heart disease risk factors, including those unique to women.

What is your advice to women about heart disease?

It is never too early and never too late to think about heart disease and learn how to prevent what is preventable. We are here to help when you start taking control over your heart health.

Two Employee Resource Groups, Mount Sinai Interfaith and Islamic Community at Mount Sinai, Hold a Silent Vigil

Rowaida Farraj, PharmD, left, and Rabbi Jo Hirschmann, BCC, FACHE

The Mount Sinai Interfaith and the Islamic Community at Mount Sinai employee resource groups gathered to hold space for collective grief and to express their shared humanity, love, respect, and understanding on Wednesday, January 10.

About 90 Mount Sinai employees, students, and trainees joined the virtual vigil held via a Zoom call.

The event, titled “Our Shared Humanity: A Silent Vigil for Mourning,” was led by Rabbi Jo Hirschmann, BCC, FACHE, Senior Director of Education, Center for Spirituality and Health at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and Rowaida Farraj, PharmD, Executive Director of Pharmacy, Mount Sinai Downtown.

“We spend so much of our lives talking. We wanted to create a quiet space where we could connect with ourselves and each other,” said Rabbi Hirschmann. “Together, we made space for our grief and for the hope and comfort that can come from simply being together. It was very meaningful to do this as Mount Sinai colleagues.”

Dr. Rowaida shared similar sentiments.

“It is clear many people are hurting during this difficult time,” she said. “We all needed a safe space to be together to feel that pain but also feel the presence of our community at Mount Sinai Health System which acknowledges that pain, respects all people, and hopes for a better future. We are so grateful we were able to create this space for everyone.”

Pin It on Pinterest