Three Years After the Start of the Pandemic, Reasons for Hope and Continued Vigilance

It has been three years since COVID-19 was declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020, by the World Health Organization. With New York City as an early epicenter, residents were hit hard. But from that experience, health care providers and researchers across the city found the opportunity to learn more about the virus and how to prepare for future pandemics.

Today, the city’s level of community transmission of COVID-19 is considered low, and the percentage of people who have completed their primary series of COVID-19 vaccinations is relatively high, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Similarly, hospitalization and mortality rates from COVID-19 remained low in recent months, compared to the period between 2020 and 2022.

Bernard Camins, MD

These factors mean that New Yorkers can probably afford to relax their vigilance compared to previous years, notes Bernard Camins, MD, Professor of Medicine (Infectious Diseases) at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Medical Director for Infection Prevention at the Mount Sinai Health System.

“We have come a long way. However, we still need to monitor how COVID-19 is affecting those who are at high risk of complications.”

Bernard Camins, MD

Who should remain vigilant?

Vulnerable groups include those who are immunocompromised, and those aged 50 and older, even if they’ve been vaccinated for COVID-19. People with certain underlying medical conditions, such as cancer; chronic kidney, lung, or liver disease; dementia; diabetes; heart conditions, or obesity are also considered at heightened risk.

For younger or healthy individuals, having COVID-19 these days might involve cold-like or mild symptoms, says Judith Aberg, MD, Chief of Infectious Diseases for the Mount Sinai Health System and Dr. George Baehr Professor of Clinical Medicine at the Icahn Mount Sinai. But vulnerable populations are at risk for developing severe disease, she adds. This includes hospitalization, needing intensive care, requiring a ventilator to breathe, or even death.

For at-risk groups, masking is recommended, as is avoiding large indoor gatherings. People planning to be organ donors should also remain vigilant for signs and symptoms of COVID-19, as an active infection could complicate one’s ability to donate, Dr. Aberg says.

“Also, people seem to have forgotten about hand hygiene; that is still important,” she notes.

What protection measures are available today?

With the federal Test to Treat initiative in place nationwide since 2022, symptomatic individuals who test positive for COVID-19 at testing sites can receive antiviral treatment, such as Paxlovid, on the spot.

“Taking Paxlovid provides that extra protection from developing complications, and the sooner it is taken, the better,” says Dr. Camins. Patients are recommended to receive antiviral treatment within five days of developing symptoms.

“One mistake people make with antivirals is that they wait to see if they feel better or worse before seeking treatment.”

Judith Aberg, MD

“If you’re a senior citizen, or have any of the underlying health conditions, when you test positive and have any symptoms, go seek treatment immediately. Do not wait,” says Dr. Aberg.

All individuals, and especially vulnerable populations, should stay up to date with COVID-19 vaccines, including the bivalent boosters, which are authorized for those ages 5 and older. “However, among people who were recommended to receive the bivalent booster, very few of them did,” Dr. Camins points out. “It seems many people have moved on regarding the pandemic before we really should.”

Judith Aberg, MD

According to the CDC, 17 percent of the U.S. population ages 5 and up have received the updated booster. In New York, that number is 18 percent.

Data have shown that the updated boosters either prevented infection or reduced the possibility of developing severe disease in people who received them. Another possible benefit of keeping up to date with vaccination is that it might prevent new variants from being as deadly as previous strains, Dr. Aberg says.

Will we need annual boosters?

Just as the bivalent boosters were updated to protect against current circulating variants and strains of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, researchers and officials are monitoring how the pathogen continues to evolve. Most of the scientific and medical community believe that the virus is headed in the direction of becoming endemic, or regularly occurring, Dr. Aberg says. “However, the jury is still out on whether annual updated boosters will be necessary,” she adds.

Neither the Food and Drug Administration nor the CDC has made any determinations on recommending annual COVID-19 shots, unlike what they have done with the flu. The data on COVID-19 collected over the recent winter could provide clarity on whether another shot might be needed this fall, says Dr. Aberg.

There are other seasonal coronaviruses and rhinoviruses that cause respiratory infections that do not require annual boosters. “It’s hard to predict whether the virus will take another turn to cause more morbidity or mortality. We’ll have to wait to see what the data shows us,” Dr. Aberg says.

What other things about COVID-19 should we be aware of?

The public health emergency declaration, which has been in place since 2020, will come to an end on Thursday, May 11, 2023. This might have implications regarding cost sharing or coverage regarding various COVID-19-related services, such as testing, treatment, or vaccinations. This might mean some services will no longer be free or will start requiring copays, depending on the insurance.

While the New York State Department of Health has not released any guidance on cost impacts, providers need to inform their patients and communities to follow up with their insurance companies and be aware of possible coverage changes, Dr. Aberg says.

“People need to be informed about potential costs before seeking COVID-19 care,” Dr. Aberg notes. “But on the other hand, we don’t want people to avoid seeking help because of cost.” If a patient experiences troubling symptoms, such as shortness of breath or fever, they should see a primary care doctor or go to the emergency room, she adds.

The medical and science community is also closer to understanding post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, or the condition colloquially known as “long COVID.”

Anyone who is infected with COVID-19 has a risk of going on to develop long COVID, in which individuals experience symptoms that persist beyond three months after the acute phase. An estimated 1 in 13 adults in the United States have long COVID, according to the CDC.

“We’re starting to zero in on specific biomarkers for people with long COVID,” says David Putrino, PhD, Director of Rehabilitation Innovation for the Mount Sinai Health System. These include platelet hyperactivation, microclots, immune dysfunction, and microbiome dysfunction.

“We are getting the science to a place where we may finally be able to identify this condition objectively.”

David Putrino, PhD

David Putrino, PhD

This has allowed providers to be better educated about the sorts of things that could cause long COVID symptoms to flare up, Dr. Putrino says. The availability of objective biomarkers also means the ability to start testing therapeutics to treat long COVID.

“A year ago, I would have thrown my hands in the air and said there were no good drug trials for long COVID,” Dr. Putrino says. “Now, I feel a little confident that we can start promising patients that these trials are on the horizon.”

“We’re getting close to getting therapeutics to prescribe. I’m hoping that will be a reality over the next two years or so,” Dr. Putrino says.

As the Pandemic Recedes, COVID-19 Research Continues on Many Fronts

While COVID-19 community transmission, mortality, and hospitalization rates have come down across the country in recent months, the efforts to understand more about SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, continue at full speed. “The energy is still robust,” says Judith Aberg, MD, Chief of Infectious Diseases for the Mount Sinai Health System and Dr. George Baehr Professor of Clinical Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Judith Aberg, MD

Much research progress has been made since COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020, but more work remains to be done.

“At all levels, from academic institutions to federal agencies, resources are still being poured into studying COVID-19 and this level of dedication is unlikely to go away anytime soon.”

Judith Aberg, MD

“It is precisely because, as a community, we have put so much effort into studying COVID-19 that we were able to learn so much about the virus and come up with vaccines and therapeutics at an unprecedented pace,” says Miriam Merad, MD, PhD, Director of the Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, and Mount Sinai Professor in Cancer Immunology.

How has COVID-19 knowledge grown over the years?

A recent breakthrough was learning why COVID-19 affects older people more severely than children, says Dr. Merad. In many other respiratory diseases, such as influenza, typically both very young and very old people are most susceptible to complications.

“One of the biggest factors we’ve discovered is that age affects innate immune response,” she says. Older individuals are more likely to have a defective response in which their type I interferon activity is less likely to mount an antiviral or anti-inflammatory response, she adds.

Understanding the links of age to inflammatory response had also been a big piece in solving the COVID-19 puzzle, Dr. Merad says.

“It appears that SARS-CoV-2 might not be directly destroying organs. Rather, pathogenic-led inflammation might be doing so instead.”

Miriam Merad, MD, PhD

While SARS-CoV-2 is in the class of coronaviruses, very little was known about its specific pathophysiology, how it infects cells and induces injury, and how the host can control the virus. The scientific community has made inroads into these fields over the past year, especially in recent months, Dr. Merad notes.

 

Miriam Merad, MD, PhD

At the start of the pandemic, there were also no objective biomarkers to characterize the disease. Today, researchers have identified various measures, including platelet hyperactivations, microclots, and immune and microbiome dysfunction, as ways to analyze the impacts of COVID-19 on the body, especially for post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, the condition colloquially known “long COVID.”

“It’s really bleeding-edge,” says David Putrino, PhD, Director of Rehabilitation Innovation at the Mount Sinai Health System. “It has really coalesced over time, and has taken two years before impressive articles were coming out about meaningful biomarkers.”

How had COVID-19 research been challenging?

“It is really difficult to do research in the middle of a pandemic,” recalls Dr. Merad. With measures in place to keep staff safe from infection, as well as prevent lab leaks, it became challenging to develop animal models. Additionally, given that COVID-19 was a new disease, there were few good models to start with, she adds.

Barriers to knowledge, tools, or resources also made studying COVID-19 an uphill task. As the disease has symptoms that span multiple specialties, including neurology, immunology, pulmonology, cardiology, and more, an effective effort into studying the pathogen required broad capabilities.

David Putrino, PhD

“I’m a neuroscientist, focusing on electrophysiology of the brain, and had a set of tools I was comfortable using,” says Dr. Putrino. “But along came COVID-19 and suddenly I had to become an expert on immune physiology, on drawing blood, and running a wet lab.”

“Collaboration became necessary, especially with people outside our usual fields.”

David Putrino, PhD

“While I feel fortunate that I’m in a position from a funding and career standpoint that can support my needs for long COVID research, many others aren’t as fortunate to develop those skill sets,” Dr. Putrino says. The reality of many scientists needing to keep their labs running and applying for grants could mean it was easier to relegate COVID-19 research to someone else, he adds.

The nascent field of COVID-19 research, especially for long COVID, means the scientific community is still divided on various definitions. But with the pandemic dying down, researchers are able to communicate and collaborate more effectively across the country on standards and definitions when it comes to conducting research or collecting data, especially as scientific conferences return in full force, Dr. Merad says.

What are some things we still don’t know about COVID-19?

On the clinical side, it is not clear for hospitalized patients what are the best immune modulating therapies or strategies. “When should we start combination immune modulating therapies? Are antivirals effective in patients on high flow oxygen if they still are shedding virus?” says Dr. Aberg. “We are still trying to optimize modalities.”

New treatments for COVID-19, including antiviral drugs such as Paxlovid, are now available to help reduce the likeliness of developing severe disease. But some shortfalls remain.

“For example, Paxlovid has significant drug-to-drug interactions and not everyone can take that,” notes Dr. Aberg. “We’re still learning how to be able to manage those who are immunocompromised and are experiencing persistent viral shedding.”

Some of the monoclonal antibody treatments that had been developed for COVID-19 and had shown efficacy earlier in the pandemic have since become less effective against current circulating variants. “We need to develop tools for rapid sequencing of virus to detect which variant is causing disease while simultaneously having available active antibody therapies.  We hope that future anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies will be effective to treat and prevent COVID-19, especially for those who are immunocompromised,” Dr. Aberg says.

In basic science, many questions about viral pathophysiology remain unanswered, especially with regards to how it affects coagulation, thrombosis, and inflammation, says Dr. Merad. Even with the success of COVID-19 vaccines at reducing infection incidence and severity, people still can still be infected, and it is not clear why that is so, she adds.

What is the current state of COVID-19 research and where is it headed?

Clinicians are looking at whether they can combine different treatment modalities, especially for immunocompromised patients, says Dr. Aberg.

The National Institutes of Health is still conducting its efforts through the networks the agency has formed during the pandemic, and is conducting multicenter clinical trials, Dr. Aberg points out. It has preserved its expedited pipeline for testing novel therapeutics, including the use of “adaptive platform studies,” where new investigative agents could use an adapted template without the need for developing a new protocol from scratch.

Long COVID clinical trials are coming down the pipeline, says Dr. Putrino. A trial to test the use of Paxlovid for treating long COVID has received an Institutional Review Board approval from the Food and Drug Administration, making it one of the first of its kind for a targeted treatment of the condition, he notes.

The discovery of objective biomarkers will also pave the way for new drugs to be developed for long COVID, or for existing treatments to be explored, says Dr. Putrino.

These biomarkers could also be leveraged for uses beyond COVID-19. “The pandemic made us realize how we have few assays to measure our immune fitness to tell us whether someone can be susceptible to disease,” says Dr. Merad. Immune biomarkers could be used to develop assays to measure whether an individual could mount a good immune response, perhaps to vaccination, or just in general. “Can we build novel tools to measure our immune fitness, in the same way we can measure our blood sugar?” she questions.

It is undeniable that clinicians and researchers are committed to COVID-19 research, says Dr. Merad. “That’s what we’re fighting for,” she says. “We’re talking to everyone—industry partners, government entities—on the need for continued effort, and everyone is on board.”

Here are Some COVID-19 Research Milestones at Mount Sinai

2022

  • Dec 8: Mount Sinai researchers published one of the first studies about changes in blood gene expression during COVID-19 being linked to long COVID
  • Aug 9: Mount Sinai launched CastleVax, a clinical-stage vaccine research and development company, whose capabilities can be leveraged to tackle SARS-CoV-2
  • June 28: Mount Sinai-led team showed immune particles derived from the blood of a llama could provide strong protection against every COVID-19 variant
  • June 14: Mount Sinai researchers have developed a rapid blood assay that measures the magnitude and duration of someone’s immunity to SARS-CoV-2
  • Mar 31: Faculty from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai play key roles in the SAVE program, established by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  • Mar 21: Clinical investigators at the Icahn Mount Sinai launched a Phase 1, open-label, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an egg-based COVID-19 vaccine in healthy, vaccinated adults who have never been infected with COVID-19

2021

  • Nov 29: Icahn Mount Sinai served as a hub site for two cohort studies as part of nationwide health consortium study by NIH on the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2
  • May 25: Mount Sinai and the Pershing Square Foundation expanded a saliva-based COVID-19 testing program
  • April 5: Mount Sinai launched the Mount Sinai COVID-19 PCR Saliva Testing program for businesses and leisure activities in New York
  • Jan 27: Mount Sinai researchers demonstrated using a machine learning technique called “federated learning” to examine electronic health records to better predict how COVID-19 patients will progress
  • Jan 27: Scientists at University of California, San Francisco, and the Department of Microbiology at Icahn Mount Sinai reported data showing the promise and potential of Aplidin® (plitidepsin), a drug approved by the Australian Regulatory Agency for the treatment of multiple myeloma, against SARS-CoV-2

2020

  • Dec 29: Emergent BioSolutions and Mount Sinai initiated a clinical program to evaluate COVID-19 Human Hyperimmune Globulin product candidate in the first of two Phase 1 studies for potential post-exposure prophylaxis in individuals at high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2
  • Sept 17: The Clinical Laboratories of The Mount Sinai Hospital has received emergency use authorization from the New York State Department of Health for quantitative use of Mount Sinai’s COVID-19 antibody test
  • June 17: Mount Sinai submitted a request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for issuance of an emergency use authorization for quantitative use of its serologic test
  • May 14: Mount Sinai established the Institute for Health Equity Research to understand the effects of health issues including COVID-19
  • April 15: Mount Sinai Laboratory, Center for Clinical Laboratories received emergency use authorization from the UFDA for an antibody test
  • April 3: Mount Sinai developed a new remote monitoring platform to help health care providers care for COVID-19 patients who are recovering at home
  • April 1: Scientists, physicians, and engineers at Mount Sinai launched STOP COVID NYC, a web-based app to capture the symptoms and spread of COVID-19 in New York City

Lucio Barreto: COVID-19: What Have We Learned, and What Lies Ahead?

Lucio Barreto, BSN, RN

It has been two years…

As the nation went into lockdown, we were activated to respond in overdrive to the needs of our communities. We were as blind about what the future held as the rest of the country, but we knew it was our time to carry the burden and make sure that our patients received the care they deserved. The most transformative power of this pandemic was not what we have learned, but rather how we learned.

We faced more than a virus…

During the last two years, we dealt with racial inequality. We understood that we did not have an America for all.  We saw that the ideal of equal rights was not there yet. We faced racism against blacks, Asians, Latin Americans—all normalized under the lens of nationalism and political rhetoric.

We learned that disinformation in the media—falsely claiming that COVID-19 is “nothing to worry about”—can derange our society and work as an obstacle for the common good.

We learned that competent leadership must be brave and walk side by side with their team. That leadership must be transformative and undertake rapid and radical changes to manage any imminent threat.

The pandemic created an opportunity to re-evaluate our lives. We had the time to measure what is important. We had the chance to understand the importance of human connections. We faced our own terrors, hidden by the busy workday, and stood in the mirror to finally see ourselves. We saw how important mental health is in our lives and the lives of others. We took the first step to destigmatize seeking help with mental health (though we are still far from the dreamed ideal).

We learned how adaptable we are. We saw the best and the worst in each other. We came to work filled with anxiety, fatigue, stress and burnout. We knew we were needed. We knew that our patients counted on us.

We cried with strangers at the bedside. We shared our own burden of family members and friends dying when we could not be there. However, we knew that wherever they were being cared for, someone like us was by their side, holding their hand.

We were happy and celebrated every time a patient was able to walk out of the hospital. We were angry when there was nothing else to do to save a life. We were frustrated when a coworker was sick. We were afraid to be the next patient on the stretcher.

We were flexible. We took good care of each other.  We dried each other’s tears.

We were resilient. They called us “heroes”. Heroes in scrubs.

What lies ahead: HOPE…

Hope that we do not repeat the same mistakes. Hope that we learned the lesson. Hope that tomorrow will be better.

We learned that we are strong together. We learned that we find a way.

Lucio Barreto, BSN, RN, CCRN, NE-BC, MICN, Clinical Program Manager, Emergency Medicine Quality and Safety, The Mount Sinai Hospital

Miriam Merad, MD, PhD: COVID-19: What Have We Learned, and What Lies Ahead?

A  review of the immunology of COVID-19 was published in March 2022 in Science by Miriam Merad, MD, PhD, Mount Sinai Professor in Cancer Immunology and Director of the Precision Immunology Institute at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and an international team of scientists. Here are excerpts:

Variants of Concern

As the virus evolves and new variants emerge, there have been concerns that such variants could increase pathogenesis by escaping from immunity generated through previous infection or vaccination or by inducing more severe disease. Some variants of concern, such as 1.351 (Beta), P.1 (Gamma), and the recently described B.1.1.529 (Omicron), have mutations that render them less susceptible to vaccine-mediated and infection-acquired immunity. It is less apparent whether some variants induce more severe disease upon primary infection than others, though strains such as B.1.1.7 (Alpha) and B.1.617.2 (Delta) are known to spread more efficiently, making it difficult to distinguish increased infection rates from increased severity.  As new variants emerge, it will be important to direct continued research efforts into identifying how such variants escape from either innate or adaptive immune responses.

Immunology of Long COVID

It is now clear that COVID-19 can lead to long-term disease—often referred to as Long COVID syndrome or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2infection (PASC)—in a significant proportion of survivors. Although there is no universal consensus in the definition of PASC, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines it as a wide range of new, returning, or ongoing health problems that people experience four or more weeks after first being infected with SARS-CoV-2. By contrast, the World Health Organization defines it as a condition that occurs in people with confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2infection, usually three months from the onset of COVID-19 with symptoms and that last for at least two months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis.

A systematic review of 57 peer-reviewed studies with 250,351 survivors of COVID-19 who met their inclusion criteria for PASC showed that the median age of patients was 54.4 years, 56 percent were male, and 79 percent were hospitalized during acute COVID-19. At six months, 54 percent of survivors suffered at least one PASC symptom. However, non-hospitalized COVID-19 survivors who developed PASC were primarily middle-aged women.

In a survey of 445 non-hospitalized Danish COVID-19 patients, persistent symptoms—most commonly fatigue and difficulty with memory and concentration—were reported by 36 percent of symptomatic participants with a follow-up of more than four weeks. Risk factors for persistent symptoms included female sex (44 percent for women and 24 percent for men) and body mass index. The immunobiology of PASC is currently under investigation. Leading hypotheses include:

  • persistent virus or viral antigens and RNA in tissues that drive chronic inflammation;
  • the triggering of autoimmunity after acute viral infection;
  • a disruption of the gut microbiota, potentially driven by virus persistence in the intestine;
  • and unrepaired tissue damage.

 Concluding remarks and future directions

The COVID-19 pandemic has wrought massive disruption and resulted in the loss of countless lives; however, there have been silver linings. The particularly rapid development of highly efficacious vaccines is foremost among these and has established a playbook for the response to future pandemics.

One comforting prospect is the degree to which advances in our understanding and treatment of COVID-19 have been aided by an unprecedented degree of scientific cooperation. Free sharing of data has allowed us to rapidly glean critical insights into the role of the immune system in contributing to both protection and pathogenesis in COVID-19. Such insights will undoubtedly help us prepare for the next pandemic, just as decades of previous immunological research led to our current COVID-19 vaccines. However, many challenges remain, and our progress in ending this pandemic is threatened by inequitable distribution of vaccines and the rise of variants that are less susceptible to vaccination and prior-infection-mediated immunity.

As infections continue to occur, there remains a need for new therapeutics and hence a need for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of COVID-19. In addition to treating acute infections, there is a dire need to better understand and develop treatments for individuals with Long COVID. Another threat is the amount of misinformation and erroneous theories about the pandemic, vaccines, and therapeutic efforts that have been circulating in social media, some unfortunately introduced by scientists.

More than ever, interdisciplinary and integrative approaches to scientific collaboration and fighting misinformation are necessary to tackle these and other challenges that lie ahead.

 

COVID-19 Research: What Have We Learned, and What Lies Ahead?

Just over two years ago, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic. New York City quickly became the epicenter, and the Mount Sinai community rose to the challenge.

Now, at this moment of cautious hope, a cross-section of the Mount Sinai community—front-line providers, researchers, and leadership—took a moment to consider two questions about the pandemic: What have we learned, and what lies ahead?

Here are thoughts from some of those in research at Mount Sinai.

Judith A. Aberg, MD

There are many lessons learned in regards to pandemic response and therapeutic interventions. In an unfathomably short amount of time, we now have effective therapeutics and vaccines to prevent much of the serious illness and death associated with SARS-CoV-2.

We have learned that vaccines not only save lives but reduce the risk of developing Long COVID. Yet, we have also succumbed to political pressures and social media misinformation that have resulted in health disparities, especially among people in rural communities and in disenfranchised populations where scientific discovery, therapeutics, and vaccines are significantly less accessible.

We must do all we can to assure that the world is aware of the true threats of COVID-19 and to provide the education and resources to protect ourselves from emerging variants. Every time the pandemic starts to seem as if it might be over, people start letting their guard down to return to pre-pandemic activities—only to find themselves caught in another surge.

We are now approaching 500 million cases worldwide, including more than 60 million deaths, since the pandemic began. The United States has led in absolute numbers with almost 82 million cases and more than 1 million deaths. We must remain vigilant and assure access to resources, therapeutics, and vaccines for all.

Judith A. Aberg, MD, Chief of Infectious Diseases, Mount Sinai Health System
Dean of System Operations for Clinical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

The Simon Lab

What have we learned over the past two years: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted that in a crisis of such dimension, when time is at a premium, one needs to have infrastructures in place to deal with it. Most important is the forging of strong working relations. We created working relations between our research scientists and the clinical medical community that did not exist before. This allowed us to quickly develop and implement tests to measure SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, follow the evolution of the virus, and provide guidance on new treatment options.

I also learned of the remarkable dedication of the Mount Sinai community. Staff, researchers, students, doctors, and nurses worked endless hours at great personal risk to deal with the many challenges we faced. I am so proud of my lab members and volunteers who joined us every day over the past two years to advance our knowledge.  None of the progress we made would have been possible without the strong, competent, and supportive leadership of the school and the hospital.

What lies ahead: Thanks to the availability of COVID-19 vaccines, antiviral treatments, and prophylaxis options, we are in a much better place now. We will build on what we learned to ensure that we are better prepared for the future. For example, the Center for Vaccine Research and Pandemic Preparedness, which is co-directed by Florian Krammer, PhD, and myself, will help to provide the infrastructures and strong working relationships needed for dealing with SARS-CoV-2 variants and future pandemics.

Viviana Simon, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Microbiology 

Michael Schotsaert, PhD

The self-sacrifice of health care personnel and scientists during the COVID-19 pandemic—trying to understand this new virus and disease to come up with proper treatments—was enormous. Thanks to previous studies on corona- and other viruses and the availability of specialized high-containment laboratories like the ones at Mount Sinai, it was possible to unravel fundamental characteristics of the virus at record speed, which informed antiviral treatments and vaccine development.

Real-time sharing of research and clinical data was crucial and was facilitated by social media and existing and new collaborations between research groups and medical teams all over the world. Public health agencies like the National Institutes of Health and the World Health Organization played a major role in facilitating collaborations, not only between academic partners but also between academia and industry. The latter was crucial for developing, validating, and bringing to the clinic the novel, live-saving antiviral drugs, antibodies, and vaccines that are the key to a pandemic exit.

None of this would have been possible without the many years of investment in pandemic preparedness. The high death toll and burden on society caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, however, shows that even more investment is needed if we want to be ready to tackle the next time a pathogen with pandemic potential emerges. Therefore it is important to further invest in global pathogen surveillance and fundamental research, and to strengthen partnerships between academia, industry, and public health agencies.

Michael Schotsaert, PhD, Assistant Professor, Microbiology

COVID-19 and the Front Lines: What Have We Learned, and What Lies Ahead?

Just over two years ago, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic. New York City quickly became the epicenter, and the Mount Sinai community rose to the challenge.

Now, at this moment of cautious hope, a cross-section of the Mount Sinai community—front-line providers, researchers, and leadership—took a moment to consider two questions about the pandemic: What have we learned, and what lies ahead?

Here are thoughts from some of those on the front lines at Mount Sinai.

Bernard Camins, MD, MSc

It has been more than two years since COVID-19 was declared a pandemic. Since then we have gained a tremendous amount of knowledge about a respiratory virus to which no one was previously immune.

We have learned that as a society, we must adapt and change our behaviors as more information becomes available. Science, after all, is the pursuit and application of knowledge based on available evidence.

For example, we learned that face coverings did prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Adherence to mask wearing not only prevented one from becoming infected but was considered an act of kindness by preventing others from being exposed in case a person was infected. We have also learned that even though an effective vaccine became available, viruses can develop mutations spontaneously that would render available vaccines less effective.

As another variant is moving through the country, we must always be vigilant that other variants may be forthcoming. We must never be complacent. We may have to start wearing masks in public spaces again if a new variant comes along that is more virulent than the Omicron variants. We may have to take another dose of the vaccine to keep up with the mutations. But then there is also hope that the worst may be behind us. One thing is certain, the world as we know it, will never be the same again.

Bernard Camins, MD, MSc, Medical Director, Infection Prevention, Mount Sinai Health System

David Putrino, MD

Although acute COVID-19 numbers have slowed down for the time being, we are still in the midst of a mass-disabling event because of the sheer number of people experiencing Long COVID symptoms.

Throughout the pandemic, Mount Sinai has been at the center of research, advocacy and care for people with Long COVID. Over the coming months and years, it is critical that we strive for the same levels of clinical and research excellence that we have achieved during the first two years of the pandemic.

Investigating novel therapies, exploring mechanisms of underlying pathology, engaging in local and federal advocacy, and maintaining a high standard of interdisciplinary care will all be crucial to ensuring that people with extremely debilitating Long COVID symptoms have the best chance of a full recovery over time.

There are millions of people across the country depending on us to keep fighting, and we will honor that commitment.

David Putrino, PhD, Director of Rehabilitation Innovation

Tracy Breen, MD

What we have learned: it is impossible to overcommunicate.

Over the course of the surge, we were bombarded by an immense amount of new scientific information, clinical guidelines, regulatory requirements, supply chain challenges, and massive life disruptions.  The speed at which all these factors changed on a daily, and even hourly basis, meant that we were continually operating in a dynamic and disrupted environment.  One of the major takeaways for me was that is it simply impossible to overcommunicate with your teams.  And for leaders, true communication involves not only pushing out information and updates but listening to the people who are doing the actual work and incorporating that expertise into your strategy and planning.

Our best moments involved harnessing our front-line teams’ insight and creativity and then rapidly getting them the necessary tools and support to innovate.  In an acute crisis, this kind of dynamic exchange is easier to prioritize as other routine demands on leadership’s time and attention get put on hold. The opportunity for leaders going forward is how we incorporate and sustain that critical connection into our daily work; this is essential for us to succeed in the challenging times ahead.

Tracy Breen, MD, Chief Medical Officer, Mount Sinai West

Brendan G. Carr, MD, MS

We’ve been reminded how connected we all are. The lines are forever blurred between our professional roles and our roles as neighbors and family.

We’re all patients, we’re all caregivers, and our actions all impact each other.

It’s an enormous responsibility and an even bigger privilege to live and work alongside regular people quietly doing extraordinary things.

Brendan G. Carr, MD, MS, Professor and Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine

 

 

 

Heather Isola, MPAS, PA-C

The COVID-19 response allowed us to discover that compassionate care is the best of us coming together. When the time came to respond to the city’s and state’s call for help, the Mount Sinai Health System was there.  The Physician Assistants (PAs) were the first providers to shift into areas of medicine that were not their own, to care for teams that became sick, and to address the surge of patients entering the hospitals.  We learned that our skills, accumulated over time, are transferable and vital to help bring excellence to patient care.

Now, after the response, we know that PAs are integral to our health care ecosystem. It takes a village and optimal team alignment to answer to something bigger than us.  Our PAs answered the call, and in doing so, elevated our care in the process. The PAs, along with our physicians, other providers, nurses, and staff have persevered through the unimaginable and have come out the other side as better health care workers and resilient citizens of the Mount Sinai Health System. We have learned, and will continue to learn, that continued teamwork and compassion for our colleagues, families, friends, and patients makes a difference to the health and safety of our community.

Heather Isola, MPAS, PA-C, Vice President PA Services, Mount Sinai Health System

Kristin Oliver, MD, MHS

The tide began to turn on the pandemic with the advent of COVID-19 vaccines, but vaccines work in arms, not in vials. With only 13 percent of people in low-income countries vaccinated, we must focus on global vaccine equity.

In the world of vaccine delivery, the phrase “the last mile” describes the immense effort and ingenuity required to deliver vaccines to people living in the most remote areas of the world. Google it, and you find images of vaccines carried on the backs of donkeys along rocky paths, on small motor boats across jungle rivers, and by foot through otherwise impassable terrain. These logistic challenges are surmountable, but first we must prioritize and appropriately fund global health care infrastructure and support policies to share vaccine technology and expertise with global manufacturers.

There is another “last mile,” one equally present in the United States. It is the mile that seems to separate the doctor recommending the vaccine from the patient who is afraid of side effects, the public health ad campaign from its target audience. This mile will be harder to cross, and the effort will require more than funding. It can only be bridged by trust. I don’t yet have the answers to how we will do this, but I plan to start by listening.

Kristin Oliver, MD, MHS, Associate Professor of Environmental Medicine & Public Health, Pediatrics, Global Health

 

The COVID-19 pandemic has left a mark on the psychosocial landscape of the Mount Sinai Health System. Our workforce has been devoted to delivering world-class, skillful patient care during unprecedented times, but we also know that this work has come at a cost. Nearly 40 percent of the front-line health care workers that we surveyed in April 2020 experienced symptoms of anxiety, depression, and/or post-traumatic stress disorder; 20 percent continued experiencing these symptoms seven months after; and nearly 30 percent reported experiencing persistent burnout.

Despite these challenges, we have learned that distress and resilience co-exist. In this same survey group, many front-line health care workers reported a greater appreciation of life and emotional growth after pandemic-related trauma. The uptick in mental health resource utilization also speaks to the resilience of staff at Mount Sinai, but we have learned that systems-level support is critical to maintaining a culture of well-being. Our team’s research has demonstrated that health care workers who received strong emotional and leadership support tend to suffer fewer long-term effects of work-related stress. As we emerge from crisis, it is hard to predict what lies ahead, but it is clear that our Mount Sinai community is poised to grow from these challenges to meet future demands.

We in the Office of Well-Being and Resilience look forward to participating and contributing to this psychosocial recovery and growth by supporting well-being, resilience, and mental health initiatives across the system.

The Office of Well-Being and Resilience

What we have learned: The toll of COVID-19 is unprecedented in our time. In the face of alarming fatalities, not knowing how to manage patients in the first wave, and fear of being ill or making someone else ill, Mount Sinai faculty, staff, and students showed remarkable dedication to their patients and one another. The rapidity of developing support services for our health care workers, including the development and rapid expansion of the Mount Sinai Center for Stress, Resilience and Personal Growth, reflects outstanding teamwork. We learned that leaders, staff, and medical trainees want and appreciate educational resources around resilience and well-being. We also learned that use of telehealth facilitated behavioral health care in an amazing way, lowering barriers to care and extending the ability to support our colleagues.

What lies ahead: We see a need to continue to support the emotional well-being of our colleagues, teammates, and students through robust multi-tiered and collaborative efforts. Expansion of outreach, resilience-building workshops, leadership engagement, and behavioral health care is essential.

The Mount Sinai Center for Stress, Resilience and Personal Growth

Pin It on Pinterest