Mount Sinai AIHH Grand Rounds: A Thoughtful Way to Adopt AI in Health Care

Isaac Kohane, MD, PhD, Chair of the Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, was keynote speaker of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai’s Windreich Department of AI and Human Health (AIHH) December 2025 session of AIHH Grand Rounds.

Health care systems across the country have been increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) systems to assist and augment what clinicians and researchers can achieve. As adoption of machine learning accelerates, thought leaders have been scrutinizing how AI is being embraced.

“Many doctors are already using these tools, such as OpenEvidence, but without visibility or oversight by health care systems,” says Isaac Kohane, MD, PhD, Chair of the Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School. OpenEvidence is an AI-powered clinical decision support and medical search engine.

Dr. Kohane is a prominent researcher in biomedical informatics and AI whose nearly 400 papers have been cited more than 95,000 times, according to Google Scholar. He was the keynote speaker of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai’s Windreich Department of AI and Human Health (AIHH) December 2025 session of AIHH Grand Rounds. Dr. Kohane wants to see not just more use of AI, but more responsible use—a theme of his lecture, which was titled “A Tipping Point for Clinicians’ Influence Upon AI-Driven Clinical Decisions.”

Dr. Kohane gave a lecture, titled “A Tipping Point for Clinicians’ Influence Upon AI-Driven Clinical Decisions,” which focused on where the opportunities lie for the health care industry to use AI more, but in a thoughtful way that accounted for human values and ethics.
The AIHH Grand Rounds is a monthly seminar series hosted by Mount Sinai’s Windreich Department of AI and Human Health (AIHH). Clinicians and researchers who work extensively with AI, including Girish N. Nadkarni, MD, MPH, CPH, Chair of AIHH (left) and David L. Reich, MD, President of The Mount Sinai Hospital (right), attend to learn and discuss the latest developments in the field.
AI is transforming the health care and scientific publishing industries, with its potential to save time and effort for individuals and institutions. However, as long as there are incentives for perverse behaviors regarding AI, there will be bad actors abusing the technology, says Dr. Kohane. These fields need to collectively reset such cultures and behaviors.
A theme Dr. Kohane discussed in his lecture is the need to build in human values within AI models. There will be occasions when a broad, normative model will fail to account for the needs of an individual patient. He proposes that the responsibility for building human values in AI lies with the clinicians and researchers who use it.
A highlight of the AIHH Grand Rounds is not merely the lectures presented, but the discussions that occur after. These discussions help foster collaboration between researchers as they share ideas.

“I chose these topics for Grand Rounds because I view the Icahn School of Medicine and its leadership as among the most forward-looking in the country,” says Dr. Kohane, “and therefore they should be truly focused on setting an example in terms of accelerating adoption options that are both safe, and also enabling patients and clinicians to benefit from the complementarity of AI to human expertise, as well as changing the promotion process to reflect greater engagement with reproducibility and robust research.”

The AIHH Grand Rounds is a monthly seminar series that showcases developments in how AI, science, and medicine intersect, and features an open discussion to foster collaboration. The inaugural session launched in September 2025.

How should health systems think about engaging with AI as it pertains to patients, clinicians, and researchers in a way that is beneficial to all parties? Dr. Kohane discussed the following themes during the seminar.

Transforming the institution with AI

By their nature, large health care systems in the United States are high-revenue, low-margin businesses, and because of that, they face challenges in moving rapidly with change to avoid disruptions.

Institutionally, AI adoption has found more comfort and scalability on the administrative side of operations, including reimbursement and corporate functions. AI is a critical lever, but not a priority for health care system spending presently, according to Dr. Kohane.

However, the application of AI on the clinical side, including continuity of care, clinical operations, and quality and safety, remains nascent or in pilot stages.

“It’s actually the doctors who are leading [with AI adoption], even when their own institutions are not supporting them directly,” says Dr. Kohane.

That landscape is slowly changing as health care leaders begin to engage their clinicians with AI support where it is needed now, but it should not be at the cost of extended, effortful multi-year governance conversations, Dr. Kohane pointed out. The incentives for using AI in the practice of medicine must be focused on improving care rather than maximizing revenue.

“And so, I anticipate that the future first adoptions will happen in specialized high-end services like concierge services, primary care, or cancer care,” he says. “But eventually, it would become a requisite for the safe practice of medicine, and for meeting the expectation of our patients, that ultimately our health care systems will be propelled into more significant engagement [with AI].”

Transforming publishing and literature review with AI

“Every part of the scientific publication process—that is, the generation of manuscripts and review of manuscripts—is going to be augmented by AI,” says Dr. Kohane. “That is going to present, or is already presenting, challenges that the whole peer-review publishing industry is not well equipped to handle.”

Dr. Kohane discussed a case study in which he created a hypothesis that was incorrect, and with AI tools was ultimately able to generate data that were not only fictional, but designed by AI to avoid detection by the majority of fake-data-generation detectors.

“We’re going to really have to address, first and foremost, the incentives that drive perverse behaviors,” he says. An industry that prizes publication volume, or publishing in high-profile publications over producing work with actual scientific impact—such as important but unglamorous replication studies—is only going to drive bad actors.

In the right hands, AI will increase the efficiency and quality of scholarly scientific review. AI can serve as a prism that allows clinical and laboratory experience to be distilled into new knowledge, forming a substrate for truly lifelong medical education. “However, we have to reset the culture and incentives,” Dr. Kohane says.

Transforming AI with human values

In an industry where urgency and time matters, AI presents a strong value proposition with its capability to process large datasets and execute large volumes of actions in a blink of an eye. Time-consuming tasks can be automated by AI, but when decisions that pertain to the care of individuals with unique needs are left to a normative model that adheres to overarching policies, the individual’s needs might not be met.

The solution is not to turn away from AI, but to develop personal models that account for the needs of not just the patient at hand, but also their caretakers, doctors, or any other relevant stakeholders, says Dr. Kohane. It is about building human values within an AI model, which can flag when an individual case does not align with the normative model.

That work to develop such projects falls on the health care system, says Dr. Kohane. He introduced the Human Values Project, an international initiative led by Harvard Medical School’s Department of Biomedical Informatics, which aims to characterize how AI models respond to ethical dilemmas in medicine, measuring both their default behaviors and their capacity for alignment. And he proposed that researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine have that potential to develop their own human values-based AI models.

“My takeaway from presenting and participating in the AIHH Grand Rounds really stemmed not from the presentation itself, but from discussions I had afterwards with various leaders of the AI efforts,” says Dr. Kohane. “My sense was that more than most institutions, [Mount Sinai’s] leadership was willing to invest and take a chance on pilots of deployments of these technologies to learn fast and adapt fast. And at the same time, everybody recognized that this is very challenging, given our current regulatory environments and incentives.”

Dr. Kohane ended his presentation with a line of wisdom for participants to consider: “There is no one to lead this in the direction we want, other than us.”

Fostering Connections and Collaborations With AI Grand Rounds

The Windreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health at Mount Sinai hosts a monthly AI Grand Rounds, which serves as a forum for clinicians and researchers to share their findings. The October 2025 session featured Vera Sorin, MD, Cardiothoracic Imaging Fellow at the Mayo Clinic as a speaker.

To foster better awareness and collaboration of AI efforts, the Windreich Department of Artificial Intelligence and Human Health (AIHH) at Mount Sinai established its monthly Grand Rounds—sessions for faculty, trainees, and staff to share ideas, learn about cutting-edge developments, and explore how AI and data science are transforming research and clinical care.

“The Grand Rounds series reflects our ongoing commitment to fostering dialogue, intellectual curiosity, and innovation at the intersection of technology and human health,” said Girish N. Nadkarni, MD, MPH, CPH, Chair of AIHH.

Modeled after medical Grand Rounds—but adapted to the unique focus of AI—the series provides a venue where clinicians, data scientists, and researchers can come together to discuss challenges, share insights, and identify opportunities for synergy.

Each Grand Rounds features invited speakers who are recognized leaders in their fields—both within Mount Sinai and from the broader AI and biomedical research communities. Presentations may cover topics such as machine learning applications in health care, ethical AI, biomedical informatics, and translational data science.

The AI Grand Rounds invites speakers who are recognized leaders in their fields, both from within Mount Sinai and externally. In Dr. Sorin’s presentation, she talked about post-deployment AI monitoring in health care radiology, challenges with foundation models, and innovative ways to overcome them.

The inaugural session kicked off in September, with Anthony Costa, PhD, Director of Digital Biology at Nvidia, as its featured speaker, who presented about accelerating the representation of biology and human health with artificial intelligence. The October session’s featured speaker, Vera Sorin, MD, Cardiothoracic Imaging Fellow at the Mayo Clinic, presented on post-deployment AI monitoring in health care radiology, discussing both technical and performance monitoring approaches at Mayo and addressing challenges with foundation models.

The schedule for 2026 is currently being confirmed, with AIHH leadership planning on balancing internal and external voices for the sessions.

Beyond highlighting excellence in research, organizers hope the AIHH Grand Rounds can inspire new methodologies, help participants explore interdisciplinary research ideas, and build meaningful professional connections, said Dr. Nadkarni.

“These sessions are designed to spark new collaborations, inspire cross-departmental initiatives, and deepen our shared understanding of how artificial intelligence can advance human health,” said Dr. Nadkarni. “Over time, we hope the Grand Rounds will serve not only as a learning platform but also as a catalyst for innovation that drives the Department’s research and clinical missions forward.”

Six Nursing Studies and Their Global Reach

Elvira Solis, MSN, RN, CCRN

A clinical nurse at Mount Sinai Queens, Elvira Solis, MSN, RN, CCRN, is impacting care far beyond her hospital’s walls. What started as an idea to enhance pupillary assessment—checking the eyes— among critical care patients evolved into a quality improvement (QI) project that led to a formal presentation at Mount Sinai’s Nursing Research Day in 2024. Her findings spread throughout the Mount Sinai Health System, and she is now disseminating her team’s work through an abstract published in the peer-reviewed nursing journal Practical Implementation of Nursing Science (PINS).

“Innovation comes from the bedside,” Ms. Solis says. “As front-liners, nurses have an unmatched capacity and power to step up, change practice, and promote excellent care. It’s all about advancing the practice and improving patient outcomes.”

Ms. Solis led one of six nursing studies featured at Nursing Research Day 2024 that were written up as abstracts and published in PINS. Organized annually by the Center for Nursing Research and Innovation (CNRI) at Mount Sinai, Nursing Research Day is day-long symposium featuring discussions with nationally recognized nurse researchers and presentations by clinical nurses across the Mount Sinai Health System and the greater New York nursing community. The next Nursing Research Day will be held Friday, February 27, 2026, at The Mount Sinai Hospital’s Stern Auditorium, and will focus on the value of research and innovation projects conducted by nurses in clinical settings. PINS is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal for nurses engaged in clinical practice that was launched in partnership with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai’s Levy Library Press in 2021.

The six teams that presented their findings and were later published in PINS represent a growing number of bedside nurses who are turning to research, QI, and evidence-based practice projects to bring their skill, knowledge, insights, critical thinking, and experience to the next level. By generating evidence-based nursing knowledge and more broadly sharing their findings—with topics ranging from virtual nursing to cardiac arrest response—these nurses are dramatically expanding the reach and influence of their practice.

Loriel Lozano, BSN, RN, CSRN, CCRN-CMC

“Nurses are in a perfect position to make critical changes that extend beyond the bedside,” says Loriel Lozano, BSN, RN, CSRN, CCRN-CMC, a critical care nurse in the Intensive Care Unit at Mount Sinai Queens. “And because we’re at the bedside, we spend more time with the patient, see how everything works from point A to point B, and can observe what’s happening at the perfect time.”

Knowing that seconds matter in a cardiac arrest response, Mr. Lozano recognized an opportunity to shave valuable time off the cardiac arrest responses on the hospital’s Medical-Surgical (Med-Surg) unit. The approach focused on modifying simple steps to be done before the team arrives.  In his first time leading a QI project, Mr. Lozano sought input from the Education Department at Mount Sinai Queens and the CNRI to create a standard response protocol and the associated training for staff. “I can’t say enough about the support I received throughout the process,” he says. “Their guidance was invaluable, and the CNRI has a really robust website where I could access the information I needed at each step.”

Ksenia Gorbenko, PhD

Ksenia Gorbenko, PhD, Associate Professor, Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine, is a medical sociologist by training, whose collaborations focus on improving health care delivery through the qualitative evaluation of program implementation, including machine learning/artificial intelligence models, remote patient monitoring, and hospital-at-home. Working with Mount Sinai Nursing, her team’s PINS abstract examines aspects of virtual nursing, one of the hottest topics in the field, about which there is limited research available.

“The future is here,” Dr. Gorbenko says. “We’re witnessing a global nursing shortage and an expansion of telehealth. We need to meet this moment—thoughtfully—from the nursing perspective. While the hands-on components of nursing are essential to care giving, there are indirect care tasks—medication reconciliation, patient sitting, certain documentation—that can be separated out and taken off the clinical nurse’s plate. This gives bedside nurses more hands-on, high-quality time with their patients. We saw this work well in our Med-Surg pilot, and I think it can work well on other units.”

He adds, “Our research is about making these types of transitions purposefully and effectively. And by disseminating our findings more broadly, we’re able to help other organizations get a jumpstart and learn from our lead.”

Melinda Ramroop, MSN, RN-BC

Melinda Ramroop, MSN, RN-BC, is a unit-based educator at Mount Sinai South Nassau, who in 2024 embarked on her first-ever QI project. Her focus was on improving the transition for new graduate nurses by adding specific evidence-based skill sessions to their orientation process.

“Anecdotally, we found that after the classes they appeared more confident,” Ms. Ramroop says. “They had more knowledge on certain tasks, and overall, we saw an increase in staff satisfaction in both the preceptors and the new graduate nurses.”

Equally important, Ms. Ramroop and her team have disseminated their findings through the nursing education team, Nursing Research Day, PINS, and social media.

“This exposure to research and nursing has reframed my whole way of thinking,” Ms. Ramroop says. “I now see certain things on the unit, and my instant thought is: How can we make this a research project?  If one person has an idea, and we’re able to disseminate it, this may help other people or other institutions to better their practice. Ultimately, all of this benefits our main focus: promoting excellence in patient care, but on a broader level.”

Alyssa Ramkissoon, RN, BSN

Study ideas can be inspired by any number of observations and experiences and can lead to unexpected opportunities. Alyssa Ramkissoon, RN, BSN, a Med-Surg nurse at Mount Sinai West, recognized the importance of integrating palliative care into the plan of care when a close family member faced a life-threatening condition. At the time, she was a nursing student at the Mount Sinai Phillips School of Nursing.

Unlike hospice patients, palliative care patients continue to receive curative therapies,” she says. “Yet, there was a lot of uncertainty about what it meant to enter palliative care, and I saw a valuable opportunity to bridge that gap.”

Through a literature review, Ms. Ramkissoon found the COMFORT Communication Project, which was funded by the National Cancer Institute and Archstone Foundation, and seemed to address her needs. So—as a nursing student—she contacted the founder of the program and forged a high-powered alliance in the process. Elaine Wittenberg, PhD, is the author of more than 150 peer-reviewed articles on hospice and palliative care communication and coauthor of seven books pertaining to palliative care, family communication, and nursing. Ms. Ramkissoon also had critical support and guidance throughout her project from Aliza Ben-Zacharia, DNP, PhD, ANP-BC, an accomplished nurse practitioner in Mount Sinai Neurology.

Following their remarkable collaboration and the success of their QI project, the three are working on a manuscript they hope to publish in a peer-reviewed journal.

“These are nursing research giants, in my eyes,” Ms. Ramkissoon says. “The generosity of their knowledge, expertise, and experience cannot be overstated. Working with them on such an impactful project, that is so meaningful to me personally, has allowed me to find my own voice in health care.”

Christopher Reyes, BSN, RN

Christopher Reyes, BSN, RN, is the Director of Nursing Quality at Mount Sinai International, a small branch of Mount Sinai that provides international health care consulting. While working as a nurse manager of a Med-Surg unit at Mount Sinai West, he recognized an opportunity to enhance care for patients at risk of decline from sepsis.

“Sepsis is very complicated,” he says. “There are many opportunities for miscommunication that can lead to suboptimal care and poor outcomes. Nurses play a critical role in ensuring high-quality care for these patients, as they are often the first to recognize the subtle and acute changes that are early warning signs of sepsis. If we’re the ones who are going to identify all the gaps, we should also be involved in fixing them.”

Working with the physicians and the nursing staff on his unit, Mr. Reyes created multipronged training, onsite resources, and enhanced protocols to support practice. Chief among them was the introduction of a bedside huddle for patients with sepsis risk, with the goal of improving compliance with a life-saving sepsis protocol called SEP-1. Following the implementation of the huddle, compliance increased and potential barriers to components of the protocol were identified. Likewise, the enhanced approach gives the nurse managers a forum for further improving sepsis response.

“We need to test out these ideas for improvement,” Mr. Reyes says. “We need to look at the evidence and try to apply it and go about it scientifically. It’s the best way nurses can make big

If you have an idea for a nursing research, quality improvement, or evidence-based practice project, please contact the Center for Nursing Research and Innovation (CNRI) at Mount Sinai.

People and Technology at the Forefront: Jonathan Nover, MBA, RN, System Vice President of Nursing, Emergency Services

Jonathan Nover, MBA, RN

In the fast-paced world of health care, Emergency Services may set the pace. In mid-2024, Jonathan Nover, MBA, RN, assumed the role of Vice President of Nursing, Emergency Services, Mount Sinai Health System, in stride and with a running start.

Mr. Nover entered with an impressive track record of supporting nurses to do their best work, and with significant results. His contributions have led to reductions in hospital-acquired pressure injuries, reduced length of stay, nurse vacancy rates of single digit to zero, increased patient experience ratings, reduced workplace violence, and a strong display of quality improvement and health care legislative advocacy on the national stage.

“Jonathan brings an impressive portfolio of innovation and outcomes to the Health System’s nursing leadership team,” says Beth Oliver, DNP, RN, FAAN, Chief Nurse Executive, Senior Vice President, Cardiac Services, Mount Sinai Health System. “A key ingredient driving his success is his steady focus on doing what’s best for the nurse at the bedside.”

Mr. Nover’s philosophy is seemingly simple and yet highly effective: place people and technology at the forefront.

“I approach my work by striving to be both innovative and servant-minded,” Mr. Nover says. “Innovative in the sense of leveraging technology and best practice to help to guide and accelerate change. I want our nurses and nurse leaders to be at the forefront of novel methods and engaged in this rapidly evolving health care landscape.”

“While I am very tech-forward, I am equally people forward,” he says. “I’m in a terrific position to serve others, to help make the work more aligned, efficient, and value based, and to make the best of every situation for the people around me, from the leaders to the clinical nurses and teams taking care of our patients. I am honored to be at the helm, guiding the collective decisions about nursing practice in the Emergency Medicine specialty. By focusing on serving others, I believe that energy is returned many-fold.”

Making Work More Efficient

In his prior role as Senior Director of Nursing at Mount Sinai Queens, this philosophy proved invaluable. “Jonathan’s decision-making—including the projects he chooses to move forward—centers around improving patient outcomes and the notion of giving time back to both the patient and the clinical nurse,” says Jill Goldstein, RN, MA, MS, Deputy Chief Nursing Officer of Mount Sinai Queens.

“We have an extraordinary opportunity to align goals with our data technology partners and artificial intelligence (AI) experts while ensuring our nurse experts are embedded into decision pathways and workflow processes. The nurse in the loop is critical,” Mr. Nover says. “This may open new doors in the ED clinical operational realm, predicting next steps in throughput with nurses re-engineering new workflows, developing models and tools to help guide nurses to seek out patients at higher risk for specific presentations, or removing manual steps for nurses to improve efficiency. The result should be improved outcomes and giving our patients back time, which in turn gives time back to our clinical staff to help them continuously reprioritize clinical demands and perhaps take a breath, absorb a learning moment, and bond with a colleague.”

Examples abound of Mr. Nover’s technology/person-forward approach and advocacy brought to life. Video patient monitoring is helping to decrease falls and improve safety. Pilots of virtual nursing have shown effective ways to offset the documentation burden on nurses. Electronic reminders of regulatory requirements are improving the efficiency of managers and assistant nurse managers. Text messaging applications are improving patient experience and digital engagement.

“We’re also creating new platforms and workflows that are going to make our work more efficient and more electronic and remove what little paper we still have left,” Mr. Nover says. “As we’re doing this work, it’s important that we commit to finding ways to decrease our footprint, waste less, and become more green.”

Once projects are piloted locally, they are then rolled out systemwide in various ways. In the case of the community-acquired pressure injuries, Mr. Nover’s team created a turnkey quality improvement project. This ensured that each Mount Sinai ED site was ready and able to carry out the specific steps or actionable items to move the project forward.

The One Mount Sinai Vision

“I am proud to note, our ED systemwide community-acquired pressure injury (CAPI) discovery project has captured over 800 CAPIs in the three months since the project has been live,” Mr. Nover says. “That translates to improved patient care and potentially a projected $12 million in-hospital cost avoidance. In another systemwide quality improvement project, we are piloting new workflows to use text messaging to reduce admission delays. We are predicting 50,000+ hours of ED boarding saved in the first year from a simple text message.”

He continues, “This methodology of rolling out projects systemwide is part of the bigger vision to align our emergency departments under the One Mount Sinai vision. Essentially, this vision means that whether you walk into an emergency department on the Upper West Side or in Brooklyn or any other site, the experience will be similar and of the same high quality in terms of care, treatment, policies, clinical practice, and even something granular like offering electronic discharge as an alternative to paper.”

In recognition of their work, four Mount Sinai EDs have received Lantern Awards from the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA) for demonstrating exceptional and innovative leadership, practice, education, advocacy, and research. The ENA is described as the premier professional nursing association dedicated to defining the future of emergency nursing. Mr. Nover says, “I envision all our EDs holding the prestigious Lantern Award by year’s end, because we are hyper-focused on excellence.”

Pathway to Leadership

Mr. Nover brings more than 18 years of progressive and transformational nursing leadership experience in emergency medicine and hospital leadership to his role of Vice President of Nursing, Emergency Services, Mount Sinai Health System. He joined Mount Sinai in 2019 as Senior Director of Nursing, Mount Sinai Queens, where he directed and oversaw the daily operations and performance of the Emergency Department, critical care and medical-surgical services, inpatient dialysis, and evening/night nursing administrator services.

Prior to joining Mount Sinai, he served in several leadership positions at NYC Health + Hospitals from 2010 to 2019, including Associate Executive Director, Emergency Department, and Hospital Patient Experience Officer, South Brooklyn Health; and Associate Director, Nursing Adult and Psychiatric Emergency Department, Lincoln Hospital.

Mr. Nover is the recipient of the New York State 1199 Nurse of Distinction for Leadership Award, and a New York City Proclamation for Community Service from Mayor Eric Adams, a testament to his transformational leadership style and commitment to community health.

He currently serves as Chair of the Government Affairs Committee for the New York State Emergency Nurse Association and is enrolled in the Yale Healthcare Leadership, Systems, and Policy Doctor of Nursing Program at the Yale University School of Nursing.

Nurse Is Inspired to Help Create an AI Tool That Prevents Pressure Injuries

Kim-Anh-Nhi (Nhi) Nyugen (left) and Maria “Vickee” Sevillano

In 2022, Maria “Vickee” Sevillano, BSN, RN, CWCN, COCN, Wound Care Specialist at The Mount Sinai Hospital, attended a virtual informational discussion on artificial intelligence (AI) that clicked like a light bulb in her mind. “Even before attending that lecture I had been wondering if we could create a machine-learning application for pressure injury prevention. I was aware that big strides had been made using AI to interpret radiologic images. But could we use AI to identify patients at risk for pressure injuries? Most likely.” So Vickee reached out to Robbie Freeman, DNP, RN, Chief Digital Transformation Officer at the Mount Sinai Health System, and asked the question.

Vickee quickly became deeply involved in exploring how AI could be used in wound care as a member of a workgroup with Kim-Anh-Nhi (Nhi) Nyugen, MSc, Senior Clinical Data Scientist, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. “Nhi needed to know our workflow, from placing the consult to chart review and completing a consults. Shadowing the nurses at The Mount Sinai Hospital to understand how wound care prevention, assessment, and treatment currently existed, we identified more than 300 clinical data points that would indicate a profile of patients at risk,” Vickee says. “From there, we created a model called the Pressure Injury Prevention Artificial Intelligence (PIPAI) Tool that would align best with our workflow. I validated the model every day for four months on two pilot units, and after some finetuning, we scaled to five additional units. I did unit-to-unit in-service with the staff to increase tool utilization. We deployed the tool to additional units, and currently the PIPAI tool is in use in 15 units.”

The initial results from the pilot units were overwhelmingly positive. There was a nine percent increase in patients discharged without pressure injuries, compared with before the pilot started. And the model was 50 percent more accurate in identifying patients at risk compared to the current risk assessment tool, the Braden Score.

“Pressure injuries are a global issue, and a heavy financial burden for hospitals, in addition to contributing to complications for patients,” Nhi says. “Traditional methods miss more than half of patients who will develop pressure injuries. “We need to create a tool to be more proactive in prevention rather than reactive after a pressure injury happens. The tool runs independently and continuously, thus at-risk patients are identified as soon as they arrive in the unit, even before the nurses see the patients.”

The model will be rolled out to Mount Sinai Morningside later in 2025 and likely to the rest of the Health System over time.

Vickee’s face lights up with a big smile when she speaks about the impact of this AI tool. “I am so excited and happy when a patient goes home with a healed pressure injury or no injury,” she says. “With this tool, maybe we can reduce pressure injuries around the world!”

New Curriculum for the Master of Science in Biomedical Science Program Provides More Options for Students

Jose Silva, PhD, left, Program Director, Master of Science in Biomedical Science, and Professor, Pathology, Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, and Oncological Sciences, shown in his lab.

The Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, part of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, has announced a new curriculum structure for its Master of Science in Biomedical Science (MSBS) program.

The MSBS program, started in 2005, features the multidisciplinary research education available at the school, a commitment to translating fundamental biomedical research into disease prevention and novel therapies, and a dedication to preparing students to contribute to the biomedical enterprise in the non-profit or for-profit sectors.

The program prepares students for a range of health-related advanced degree programs and careers, whether focused on medicine, such as the MD program; research, such as the PhD and MD-PhD programs; or manager-level employment in the clinical and industrial sectors. Eligible students should have a degree in science or a related discipline from an accredited college or university.

“For 20 years, our MSBS program has successfully prepared our students for future success in advance degree programs. Nonetheless, we recognized that a changing job environment required us to provide students with more options, and the new program structure does just that,” says Eric Sobie, PhD, Senior Associate Dean for Master’s in Basic Science Programs.

The program has been restructured to address the changing educational landscape. The new MSBS program offers four distinct tracks that target different types of students and provide greater flexibility for how students can complete the program. The total minimum credits has been reduced from 45 to 36 credits over two to four semesters.

Students will choose their track based on their career goals and stage of life:

  • Track 1: Post-Baccalaureate Pre-doctoral (pre-PhD or pre-MD-PhD): This full-time, four-semester track requires students to complete a master’s thesis based on original laboratory research and features a staggered block schedule to facilitate focused study. Students will learn the fundamentals of biomedical sciences while engaging in hands-on research in the laboratories of their chosen Principal Investigators.
  • Track 2: Post-Baccalaureate Pre-medical (pre-MD): This full-time, three-semester track also follows a block schedule structure. Students graduate with a capstone project and a final comprehensive examination. This track allows students interested in applying to MD programs to better prepare for the MCAT exam by offering a lighter course load during the spring semester. Students also benefit from non-curricular experiences available at The Mount Sinai Hospital, such as clinical shadowing.
  • Track 3: Industry/Clinical/Professional Development: This flexible track, available in three or four semesters, combines a block schedule alongside a capstone project. It caters to individuals working in the clinical, educational, or private sector who aim to enhance their skills and advance their careers into higher-ranked, better-paid positions.
  • Track 4: Accelerated Industry/Clinical/Professional Development: This faster-paced version of Track 3 consists of two full-time semesters with a block schedule, a capstone project and a final comprehensive examination. It is designed for individuals seeking to enhance their skills within a condensed time frame.

“Our new curriculum retains our unique hands-on training while offering more options and flexible tracks to support your career goals. Whether you’re interested in research, healthcare, or industry, and whether you’re a recent graduate or a professional looking to advance, we’re committed to helping you gain the knowledge and experience needed to take your career to the next level,” says Jose Silva, PhD, MSBS Program Director and Professor, Pathology, Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, and Oncological Sciences.

These tracks will continue to leverage the multidisciplinary training areas available at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai through the PhD programs in Biomedical Sciences, Neuroscience, and the recent joint PhD program in Health Sciences in Engineering with the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. This structure allows students to earn a specific concentration or specialization notation on their transcripts by completing a minimum of six credits in concentration-related elective courses, in addition to the required courses and a thesis or capstone project in concentration-related fields.

Students can choose from nine specialty areas to tailor their studies, including:

  • Cancer Biology
  • Disease Mechanisms and Therapeutics
  • Development, Regeneration, and Stem Cells
  • Immunology
  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies in Medicine
  • Health Sciences in Engineering

Visit our website or contact us to learn more about this program and find out which track aligns with your schedule and career goals.

Pin It on Pinterest