Mount Sinai Creates First Experimental Personalized Vaccine for a Variety of Cancers

The image of this Phase 1 trial shows the progress of one patient who began to mount a robust immune response to their cancer six months after receiving the full 10 dose-regimen of Mount Sinai’s experimental cancer vaccine. (T cells are represented by black dots, as seen in the bottom row.)

The first personalized cancer vaccine administered to patients prior to evidence of spread but after surgery or a stem cell transplant, was shown to be safe, well tolerated, and potentially beneficial in preventing disease recurrence in a phase 1 clinical trial at The Tisch Cancer Institute of the Mount Sinai Health System.

The results of the trial were presented virtually, in April, at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting and generated excitement among attendees. It was the first time a personalized vaccine of this sort had been given to patients with a variety of cancers—including lung, breast, ovarian, and head and neck cancers as well as multiple myeloma, a disease of the white blood cells. Prior to receiving the vaccine, the patients either had surgery or an autologous stem cell transplant as a standard-of-care treatment. After an average follow-up of 880 days, 4 of the 13 patients in the trial had no evidence of disease.

Thomas Marron, MD, PhD

“Most of the patients in our study had well over a 50 percent chance of the cancer coming back,” says trial co-leader Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Medicine (Hematology and Medical Oncology), and Director of The Tisch Cancer Institute’s Early Phase Trial Unit. “The No. 1 thing we were interested in was, did we successfully teach the patient’s T cells, their immune cells, what to look out for and what to kill in case there were microscopic pieces of the tumors that remained in the body? Hopefully, if the patient does have residual disease, those T cells can hunt it down and kill it.”

Immunotherapies are usually given after the patient’s cancer has already metastasized or spread to other parts of the body. But Mount Sinai administered its personalized vaccine before there was evidence of spread, so the vaccine could teach the body’s immune cells what to be on the lookout for in case remaining tumor cells were still circulating after surgery or stem cell transplant.

Another unique aspect of the trial was that each patient’s genetic information, including their normal DNA as well as their tumor’s DNA and RNA, were sequenced and run through OpenVax, Mount Sinai’s proprietary, computer program.

OpenVax compared the genetic information from the patient and the tumor to define which mutations, or changes, were unique to the tumor, and then identified 10 “foreign” proteins in each patient’s tumor that the patient would most likely develop an immune response to. A personalized vaccine for each patient was then created from synthetic versions of each of those 10 proteins in Mount Sinai’s Vaccine and Cell Therapy Laboratory, a highly specialized unit that meets the manufacturing standards of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The laboratory is run by the trial’s senior leader, Nina Bhardwaj, MD, PhD, Ward-Coleman Chair in Cancer Research, and Director of Immunotherapy at Icahn Mount Sinai.

Since the cost of developing each of these personalized vaccines is extremely high, it is unlikely that there will be a phase 2 of this particular trial, according to Dr. Marron. The goal of the trial “really is about informing future novel therapies,” he says. “Ideally, we will be able to get to the point where we do a biopsy and send it off to a lab and receive a vaccine, but that is very difficult to do now and very expensive. As the technology improves it may become possible.”

Nina Bhardwaj, MD, PhD

During their next phase of research, the Mount Sinai team plans to develop vaccines that can be administered to groups of patients who have the same cancerous mutations, instead of focusing on each patient’s unique DNA.

This research is being informed by Dr. Bhardwaj, who was the senior author of a paper in the December 10, 2020, issue of the journal Cell, which found that similar mutations appeared in a subset of patients with stomach, colon, and endometrial cancers.

“I’m looking forward to creating what we call ‘shared neoantigen vaccines,’” Dr. Marron adds. “This is based on our understanding that certain mutations exist in a high percentage of lung cancers, pancreatic cancers, colon cancers, and other types of cancer. If we were able to make a vaccine that covers, say, 100 different mutations, we would have a vaccine that could help a majority of cancer patients in the world.”

Currently, Dr. Marron and other top researchers at Mount Sinai are making inroads in an area of cancer vaccine development called in situ or “at the site of” vaccines, with at least eight early trials now under way. These vaccines are being administered to patients whose cancerous tumors have metastasized following their first round of standard-of-care treatment, such as surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation. Patients receive an injection directly into one of their tumors of an adjuvant that revs up the immune system, which instructs the immune system to find and kill other pieces of the tumor that may remain in the body.

Mount Sinai Recognizes Lab Team for their Work during the COVID-19 Pandemic

COVID-19 brought numerous challenges for the hundreds of employees working in and with our medical laboratories across Mount Sinai Health System. They continued to show agility and dedication in meeting the changing needs of our community as the pandemic progressed. Mount Sinai wishes to recognize the contributions of these teams during Medical Laboratory Professionals Week, observed the last full week in April each year.

Mount Sinai lab colleagues have been involved with major breakthroughs over the past year because testing was central to learning about the COVID-19 pandemic.

At the start of the pandemic, our lab teams rapidly transformed their operations to expand and modify testing for COVID-19 as the number of patients affected grew and the standards for testing morphed. They quickly became a national leader in providing antibody testing and treatment, receiving Emergency Use Authorization for a very early version of the test which identified candidates for antibody plasma donation in early treatments.

Many studies about COVID-19 antibody responses in our patients were possible because of the coordination and hard work of the lab teams across Mount Sinai. They were also integral to establishing the Mount Sinai COVID-19 PCR Saliva Testing program as a part of the New York State Excelsior Pass program.

The Mount Sinai lab team is made up of many different people working in coordination across the Health System, including histologists, lab technologists, quality experts, lab information technology experts, physicians, autopsy and morgue teams, managers, and many more. Their continued dedication and collaboration is vital to keeping our community safe and well.

Pregnancy and Antidepressants: Should You Avoid Taking Them?

Approximately half of women who use antidepressants before pregnancy decide to discontinue use either before or during pregnancy due to concerns about the negative consequences for their child.

Those who are pregnant or who may be thinking of getting pregnant may wonder if taking antidepressants could affect the heath of the child. New research from Mount Sinai offers some potentially important findings and shows that the underlying mental health of the parents is more of a concern than the medication itself.

The study shows that while there is a link between maternal antidepressant use during pregnancy and affective disorders in the child later in life, the link also exists between paternal antidepressant use during pregnancy and child mental health.

The data suggest the observed link is most likely due to the underlying mental illness of the parents rather than any “intrauterine effect,” which means any effect the medication could have on the fetus developing inside the uterus. These affective disorders include depression and anxiety.

“Our study does not provide evidence for a causal relationship between in-utero exposure to antidepressants and affective disorders in the child,” says Anna-Sophie Rommel, PhD, an instructor in the Department of Psychiatry at Icahn Mount Sinai and first author of the paper. “So, while other long-term effects of intrauterine exposure to antidepressants remain to be investigated, our work supports antidepressant continuation for women who would like to continue taking their medication, for example because of severe symptoms or a high risk of relapse. It is important to note that untreated psychiatric illness during pregnancy can also have negative consequences on the health and development of the child. Women and their health care providers should carefully weigh all of the treatment options and jointly decide on the best course of action.”

Anna-Sophie Rommel, PhD

Approximately half of women who use antidepressants before pregnancy decide to discontinue use either before or during pregnancy due to concerns about the negative consequences for their child, according to Dr. Rommel, who is also an expert in epidemiology and has been studying how the COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affects pregnant women in underserved communities.

Major depressive disorder is highly prevalent, with one in five people experiencing an episode at some point in their life, and is almost twice as common in women than in men. Antidepressants are usually given as a first-line treatment, including during pregnancy, either to prevent the recurrence of depression, or as acute treatment in newly depressed patients. Antidepressant use during pregnancy is widespread and since antidepressants cross the placenta and the blood-brain barrier, concern exists about potential long-term effects of intrauterine antidepressant exposure in the unborn child.

Using the Danish National Registers to follow more than 42,000 babies born during 1998-2011 for up to 18 years, researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai investigated whether exposure to antidepressants in the womb would increase the risk of developing affective disorder like depression and anxiety in the child.

In a study published April 5 in Neuropsychopharmacology, the scientists found that children whose mothers continued antidepressants during pregnancy had a higher risk of affective disorders than children whose mothers stopped taking antidepressants before pregnancy.

However, to understand whether the underlying disorder for which the antidepressant was given or the medication itself was linked to the child’s risk of developing an affective disorder, they also studied the effect of paternal antidepressant use during pregnancy and similarly, found that children of fathers who took antidepressants throughout pregnancy had a higher risk for affective disorders. Thus, the research team speculates that rather than being an intrauterine effect, the observed link is most likely due to the parental mental illness underlying the antidepressant use.

Students Present Their Latest Studies at Medical Student Research Day

One hundred six poster presentations and four oral presentations capped off new research that was conducted by students at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and featured at Mount Sinai’s Fourth Annual Karen Zier, PhD, Medical Student Research Day, held over Zoom in March.

Participating in Research Day fulfills one of the medical school’s graduation requirements. Eighty percent of the presenters each year are in their second year of medical school.

“Medical Student Research Day is a showcase and an opportunity for students to share the research and scholarship they have done with their mentors with the Mount Sinai community,” says Mary Rojas, PhD, Director of Icahn Mount Sinai’s Medical Student Research Office, and Associate Professor of Medical Education. “It is an early snapshot of the students’ accomplishments.”

Dr. Rojas says that by the time they graduate, more than half of Mount Sinai’s students will have published in peer-reviewed journals. The Class of 2021 has already published more than 400 peer-reviewed articles.

The event exemplifies Mount Sinai’s commitment to fostering biomedical research and introduces students to the intellectual rigors, skills, and collaboration that lead to incremental findings and life-changing discoveries.

Under the mentorship of Tanvir Choudhri, MD, Associate Professor of Neurosurgery, at Icahn Mount Sinai, second-year student Zachary Spiera found that the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs), which diminish inflammation, does not make users more susceptible to concussions and does not worsen their outcomes. This was a subject he had wondered about because he and his teammates had plied themselves with NSAIDs while playing basketball and soccer in high school and middle school.

Before launching his own research, Mr. Spiera searched through medical literature, but could not find an answer. “As a student you look up to the medical community and think there are going to be answers to your questions,” he says. “Then you see something that hasn’t been figured out yet.” He is first author on a study about this subject that was recently accepted for publication in the Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics.

 

This spring, Jordyn Feingold will receive a joint MD and Master of Science in Clinical Research, before continuing at Mount Sinai for her residency in Psychiatry. At Research Day, she presented her work on the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on 2,579 front-line health care workers at The Mount Sinai Hospital. She and her mentor, Jonathan Ripp, MD, MPH, Dean for Well-being and Resilience and Professor of Medicine (General Internal Medicine, and Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine) recently published their findings in the journal Chronic Stress.

One of the study’s key takeaways, Ms. Feingold says, was the high prevalence—39 percent—of COVID-19-related post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, or generalized anxiety disorder that existed among the hospital’s front-line health care workers at the peak of the pandemic last year. The “greatest driver of those symptoms was being burned out, which is significant,” she says, “because it was happening well before COVID-19 and it is something that can be addressed.” Her research also found “the greatest modifiable protective factor was feeling supported by hospital leadership.”

The COVID-19 pandemic provided a springboard for student research by others, including second-year students Cynthia Luo, Alexander Kalicki, and Kate Moody, who also presented abstracts of their studies on Research Day.

Ms. Luo studied resilience among her fellow medical students during the pandemic under the mentorship of Craig Katz, MD, Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Global Health, and Medical Education, at Icahn Mount Sinai. She divided students into two groups: those who responded to a survey by saying the COVID-19 pandemic had been their most traumatic life event, and those who responded by saying they had experienced earlier life traumas, such as the loss or illness of a loved one. Ms. Luo then measured their responses on a resilience scale that was created at Mount Sinai. “Students who indicated a non-COVID-19 impactful life event had significantly higher resilience than those who indicated COVID-19,” says Ms. Luo. “To me that demonstrates that having prior stressful life experiences was, in some ways, protective for managing COVID stress. Potentially, these experiences helped students grow and develop their resilience behaviors before COVID-19.” Ms. Luo plans to finish compiling her research and submitting it for publication in the coming months.

 

Mr. Kalicki and Ms. Moody are co-authors on a study that was just accepted by the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), which examined the barriers to video-based telehealth access that older homebound adults faced during the pandemic. Mr. Kalicki worked as a software engineer before entering medical school and says his passion for using technology to improve health care delivery led him to pursue the project under the mentorship of Peter Gliatto, MD, Professor of Medicine (General Internal Medicine), Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, and Medical Education at Icahn Mount Sinai. Katherine Ornstein, PhD, MPH, Associate Professor, Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, also served as the students’ mentor.

Ms. Moody says she was drawn to the subjects of process improvement and providing a high level of health care to a population that is difficult to access. Both students helped design a survey that was completed by physicians in the Mount Sinai Visiting Doctors Program and conducted the data analysis for the study. They also created a data collection sheet for Mount Sinai’s Epic electronic health record system to systematically record information about patients’ previous telehealth use, as well as structural barriers patients may face, such as access to the internet or the capacity to pay for cellular data. The students hope that a better understanding of these barriers will help inform future interventions that are designed to reach patients with limited access to care.

Artificial Intelligence Tools May Detect Abnormalities that Could Otherwise Be Missed

Mount Sinai radiologists are comparing machine-read patient discharge summaries with original, human-read reports.

A patient’s electronic health record typically contains a trove of information that can be used to help predict and manage their future health needs. But much of that information is often composed of unstructured or fragmented data that first must be translated into language that physicians are able to understand.

A new partnership between the Mount Sinai Health System’s Department of Radiology and an Israel-based start-up, Maverick Medical AI, is exploring how to accomplish that task through the use of artificial intelligence. In a proof-of-concept study, Maverick’s deep learning and natural language processing (NLP) algorithms are being used to accurately identify co-morbidities in 1.5 million patient discharge summaries and radiology reports. If it is successful, Maverick’s program could open the door for its use in an array of medical, research, and business opportunities at Mount Sinai.

David Mendelson, MD

David Mendelson, MD, Vice Chair of Radiology Information Technology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, is playing a key role in the research. He says one of Maverick’s strengths is its ability to report on secondary abnormalities in nearby organ systems that are sometimes only partially seen or could possibly be overlooked in radiological screenings.

“If someone is screened for lung cancer and the findings are negative, that’s great news for the patient,” says Dr. Mendelson. “But if natural language processing could identify secondary indications like coronary artery calcification or abnormal density of the liver, which might suggest non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, that information could prove very useful to physicians and patients. Physicians might be able to take preventive steps to improve outcomes for patients and ultimately lower health care costs downstream.”

Determining whether Maverick’s propriety algorithm can provide that important information is the responsibility of Pamela Argiriadi, MD, Assistant Professor of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology at Mount Sinai. Dr. Argiriadi and a team of residents are spot-checking secondary co-morbidities extracted by the algorithm from an ocean of radiology reports and discharge summaries to determine how they compare to the original, human-read reports.

“Radiology reports contain a wealth of information and we hope our study will shed light on how key-word phrases in those documents can be mined to provide input into the well-being of patients,” Dr. Argiriadi says. “A major goal of ours is to improve communication with primary care providers by reporting secondary findings to them, which can result in follow-up treatment and preventive medicine.” The software can recognize these findings within the report, extract them, and flag them for the provider.

Yossi Shahak, Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Maverick Medical AI, estimates that as much as 80 percent of a patient’s health information remains untapped due to its unstructured format. Translating that raw, fragmented data into medical coding language would provide physicians with actionable clinical insights.

“We are starting with radiology and hope to expand the vocabularies across many medical subspecialties, like cardiology and gastroenterology,” says Mr. Shahak. “That expansion of our data sets could provide Mount Sinai physicians with significant value when they mine it for often overlooked chronic conditions and risk factors. In addition, the conversion from unstructured data into medical coding will help Mount Sinai improve their financial capabilities.”

Young, Asymptomatic People Can Get Reinfected With COVID-19 and Spread it More Than Once, Study Shows

A prospective study of 3,249 Marine recruits—who were mostly male and between the ages of 18 and 20—shows a significant risk of reinfection among those who have antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that leads to COVID-19.

The study, posted on MedRxiv, was led by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai working with the Naval Medical Research Center. It found that the risk of reinfection in those with antibodies was 18 percent of the risk of infection in those without antibodies. Most of the reinfected Marines were asymptomatic, and none required hospitalization. The infections were detected by PCR tests.

The findings support the importance of vaccinating all segments of the population, including individuals who have SARS-CoV-2 antibodies but were never actually diagnosed with COVID-19, and those who were diagnosed, recovered, and think they are now safe from another infection. The study also points to the fact that young people, who are typically asymptomatic, may unknowingly spread the disease to others more than once.

“It is important that we don’t neglect this college-age group of the population,” says the study’s lead author, Stuart Sealfon, MD, the Sara B. and Seth M. Glickenhaus Professor of Neurology, Neuroscience, and Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics at Icahn Mount Sinai. “They are such an important group in spreading the disease. Many young people have this ‘get it and get over it mentality’ and unfortunately they still have a surprisingly high risk of recontracting it and possibly spreading the virus to others.”

The six-week study was highly controlled. It involved two separate periods of quarantine and multiple tests for COVID-19 before the recruits entered basic training at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, in South Carolina. The study found that among those with antibodies, the reinfected individuals had lower antibody levels and more often lacked detectable levels of the virus-neutralizing antibody activity that blocks infection.

According to Dr. Sealfon, the findings should help resolve any concerns over whether people who have already had COVID-19 should receive the vaccine, particularly in light of current vaccine shortages.

Stuart Sealfon, MD,

“That’s an important take-home message,” says Dr. Sealfon. “Certainly we can show from this study that there’s a fairly high risk of reinfection and not everybody who has had infection will generate effective immunity. So you really want to vaccinate everyone and not worry if they’ve had it or not.”

Why some people fail to generate persistent immunity against reinfection from COVID-19 remains unknown. But highly variable responses to any disease are actually beneficial for evolution.

“When a new disease shows up, individual immune responses are variable to ensure survival at a population level,” says Dr. Sealfon. “People have different genetics that make up their immune systems. They have different previous exposure histories that train the immune system in how to respond to new infections. Immunity uses combinatorial systems to hedge its bets to try and generate the best response it can within an individual and to vary what’s happening across individuals. As a result of individual differences, some people generate more effective long-term immune responses than others.”

In the November 11, 2020, issue of The New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Sealfon published an earlier study of these marine recruits during their initial supervised quarantine period. He showed that strict public health measures including wearing face masks, social distancing, hand washing, and widespread testing did not completely suppress transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Pin It on Pinterest