Mount Sinai Psychiatry Residents Win Multiple National Awards

Psychiatry residents at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai have been awarded several prestigious national prizes and fellowships this year in recognition of their exceptional patient care, outstanding leadership, and remarkable research prowess.

Psychiatry residents and training directors at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Jessica Ables, MD, PhD, was selected as one of 12 Laughlin Fellows by the American College of Psychiatrists. She was also selected for membership in Alpha Omega Alpha, the national medical honor society, in recognition for her service as an outstanding clinician, scholar, mentor, teacher, and role model. Finally, she was selected as one of 20 residents for the Career Development Institute for Psychiatry, a highly competitive national training program funded by the National Institute of Mental Health. “I am extremely honored to be selected,” she said. “I’m thankful for the wonderful mentorship at Mount Sinai that has enabled me to be competitive for these awards.”

Youngjung Kim, MD, PhD, was one of 10 psychiatry trainees nationwide awarded the APA/APAF Leadership Fellowship. The award fosters leadership development by connecting trainees with thought leaders, peers, and mentors in order to grow their networks and learn about governance in organizational psychiatry. “It is an honor to be selected to be an APA/APAF Leadership Fellow,” said Dr. Kim. “I hope to learn from the leaders and colleagues in psychiatry to bring about a positive change in my community. I am very lucky and grateful to have amazing mentors in our Mount Sinai program who will challenge, encourage, and support me to apply for this incredible opportunity.”

Adjoa Smalls-Mantey, MD, DPhil, received the Resident Recognition Award from the American Psychiatric Association (APA). This award is given to outstanding residents who exhibit one or more of the following: compassion, leadership, community service, political action, and clinical excellence. “It is an honor to be recognized by the APA,” said Dr. Smalls-Mantey. “I hope that more trainees and faculty become involved in the APA because it is a great organization through which to effect change for patients and the field of psychiatry.”

 

APA 2019: Ketamine and Deep Brain Stimulation

On May 19, James Murrough, MD, PhD, director of Mount Sinai’s Depression and Anxiety Center for Discovery and Treatment, and Martijn Figee, MD, director of Mount Sinai’s Interventional Psychiatry Program, chaired a session on next-generation solutions for treatment resistant depression (TRD). The speakers covered ketamine, inflammation, deep brain stimulation (DBS), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

Ketamine: Then, now, and looking ahead
Dr. Murrough discussed how the road to discovering new treatments for TRD has been paved with medications that have almost identical biological mechanisms, and that a new pathway—like targeting the glutamate system via ketamine—has been an inevitable next step. The first iteration of this, Janssen’s newly approved SPRAVATO (esketamine) CIII Nasal spray, could bring relief to millions of patients. Dr. Murrough discussed the first multi-site clinical trial of ketamine in TRD, studies on repeated dosing of ketamine for TRD, and the first study of intranasal ketamine in TRD—all conducted at Mount Sinai. He also covered the rapid antidepressant effects of the novel GABA-A modulator brexanolone, which the FDA recently approved for the treatment of postpartum depression. He concluded that the long-term efficacy and effects of ketamine remain to be seen, but based on preliminary rodent studies he believes the treatments will need to be regular and conducted indefinitely in order to maintain efficacy in patients.

Dr. Murrough discussing ketamine at the APA Annual meeting in San Francisco.

A subgroup: Patients with inflammation
Andrew Miller, MD, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Emory University, showed that as many as 25-30 percent of depressed patients exhibit the primary features of chronic inflammation. He covered how administration of inflammatory stimuli causes depressive symptoms, and how inhibition of inflammation reduces depressive symptoms. In addition to targeting the inflammation directly, he recommends targeting the “downstream effects” of inflammation on the brain, such as dopamine and glutamate systems. Dopaminergic medications these patients may respond to include bupropion, stimulants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and dopamine agonists. This targeted treatment, available by way of the red flag of inflammation, means precision medicine is possible for these patients.

Deep brain stimulation
Dr. Figee brought the backstory on DBS, a treatment that uses implanted electrical impulses to control symptoms for a range of psychiatric and neurologic diseases. In patients with TRD, DBS targets are part of a larger ventral corticostriatal network involved in the regulation of negative and positive mood. Although DBS is effective in approximately 50 percent of patients with TRD, it is still experimental and can only be received as part of a clinical trial. Before taking this step, however, Dr. Figee emphasizes that patients need to have gone through a variety of attempts at treatment including psychotherapy, a variety of antidepressants, at least six sessions of ECT, and possibly repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and ketamine. In order to be considered for DBS, the patient must have suffered from TRD for less than two years, and exhibit no schizophrenia/non-affective psychosis, no primary Axis II personality disorder, and no cerebrovascular risk factors. They must also have no other implanted devices, no drug abuse in the past six months, and no cognitive impairment or mental retardation. For more information, check out the Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics.

A slide from Dr. Figee’s talk on deep brain stimulation.

Ketamine and ECT for apathy, anhedonia, and suicidal ideation
Katherine Narr, PhD, professor of neurology, psychiatry, and biobehavioral sciences at The University of California, Los Angeles, discussed how ECT and ketamine are highly effective at reducing symptoms of apathy, anhedonia (reduced ability to feel pleasure), and suicidal ideation in patients with TRD. ECT has its advantages in that about 70 percent respond and about 50 percent achieve remission, and it’s fast-acting (within 2-4 weeks), it has no systemic effects (unlike medications). Its disadvantages, on the other hand, include stigma, anesthetic effects, cost, cognitive side effects, and the fact that approximately 50 percent relapse within six months. As for ketamine, the pros include that 50-70 percent respond positively, it’s fast-acting (within hours), and has been used safely as an anesthetic since the 1960s. The disadvantages, however, are durability (approximately one week), potential psychotic and dissociative effects, it’s an easy drug to abuse, and the high cost. She concluded that over the short term, ketamine may be as effective as clinically prescribed ECT for reducing depression, apathy, anhedonia, and suicidal ideation.

 

APA 2019: Child Separation and the Impact on Mental Health and Resilience

At the American Psychiatric Association’s 2019 Annual Meeting in San Francisco on May 21, Rachel Yehuda, PhD, director of Mount Sinai’s Traumatic Stress Studies Program, and Adriana Feder, MD, director of Mount Sinai’s Trauma and Resilience Program, chaired a session on separating migrant families and the impact it has on mental health and resilience.

Dr. Adriana Feder presenting findings from a child separation case study at APA 2019 in San Francisco.

Dr. Yehuda opened the session by stating that the current immigration policies create an untenable situation that leads to lifelong mental health complications for the victims of family separation. She recommended focusing efforts on prevention of trauma-related consequences, since obtaining mental health care can be challenging for even the most privileged in our society.

She also posed ethical questions concerning whether mental health providers have an obligation to align professional and personal values when it comes to advocacy and fighting injustice, as well as the role of the mental health provider in the face of trauma occurring outside the context of traditional practice. “Many of us have had mental health training in which specific values have been instilled: wait for the patient to make the first move, maintain objectivity with compassion, take a non-judgmental stance, and provide support from the sidelines,” she said. “This contrasts with ideals like finding people that need help and making the initial contact, and acting out of a conviction of social justice to fix broken policies rather than just pick up pieces from inadequate and ill-advised systems.”

A case study
Dr. Feder’s segment covered results of a cross-sectional study of asylum-seeking families that took place at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement center in mid-2018, overseen by Craig Katz, MD. Sarah MacLean, a student at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and two other students spent two months speaking with more than 400 mothers about the mental health of their children who were being detained with them. A subset of the mothers had been separated from their children and sent to separate facilities across the United States, then reunited before the students spoke to them. Ms. MacLean and her colleagues reported a high rate of emotional problems and total difficulties in the children that had been separated compared to those who remained with their mothers. They also assessed a subset of the older children by directly giving them a PTSD questionnaire, and found that the rate of a probable PTSD diagnosis was 17 percent, which is almost four times higher than the lifetime prevalence in the United States.

In a video recording, Ms. MacLean states that the findings highlight the need for immediate mental health treatment for long-term wellbeing, specifically comprehensive mental health screening and culturally responsive and trauma-informed mental health care. “I think the efforts of Sarah and her colleagues exemplify how psychiatry can be more proactive, community-oriented, and public health oriented,” said Dr. Katz. “We as psychiatrists need to get out there in the world and not wait for the world to come to us.”

 

A Canadian perspective
Rachel Kronick, MD, professor of psychiatry at McGill University, spoke about recent research on the effects of immigration detention in Canada. Her research showed that children living in detention and experiencing separation from their parents, even when very brief, exhibited depression, sleep difficulties, developmental regressions, anxiety, PTSD, and even selective mutism while in detention, and often after release. “Trauma has long-lasting effects, and when we are doing nothing, we are doing something,” she said. Ultimately, she recommends protecting children from mental health harm by prohibiting the detention of children and families, as well as the separation of children from parents.

Taking action
Alicia Lieberman, PhD, professor of psychiatry at The University of California, San Francisco, covered the developmental stages of early childhood and how the lack of a clear reunion plan, chaotic shelter environment, and lack of physical touch contribute to psychiatric conditions, and even early mortality. She emphasized that children need external resources to help them cope with fear, such as stable caregivers and safe and predictable routines, and described her work with the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN). The NCTSN has 13 centers working with separated or unaccompanied children, such as onsite mental health clinics on either side of the border in Las Cumbres, New Mexico. They provide trauma-informed, mental health interventions for children and families post-migration, including child-parent psychotherapy, dialectical behavior therapy, art therapy, and child-centered play therapy.

In the discussion that followed these presentations, Dr. Yehuda challenged the audience to consider whether mental health providers are mandated to respond to policies that create mental health casualties, or whether it is the job of the provider to try to reduce the emotional impact of harsh environments however they are caused. After a thoughtful debate, it became clear that it is certainly possible for mental health providers to have constructive discussions about best mental health practices that are independent of political leanings. Dr. Yehuda concluded the session by summarizing the general consensus of the group. “Psychiatry has entered a new era and the provision of humanitarian mental health aid to those unable to access or prioritize mental health is a moral imperative,” she said. “Social justice advocacy through primary prevention of trauma can be a powerful prophylactic for PTSD and other mental disorders.”

 

APA 2019: Innovation Lab Grand Prize Winners

On Monday, May 20, a group from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai won the $10,000 grand prize at the Psychiatry Innovation Lab at the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) 2019 Annual Meeting in San Francisco. The APA’s annual “Shark Tank style” competition features contestants pitching three-minute videos on their ideas for innovating and disrupting in the field of mental health care.

Murad Khan, MD, Annie Hart, MD, Isobel Rosenthal, MD, MBA, and Jordyn Feingold, MAPP and MD/MSCR candidate, won for their concept of Medimmunity, an online platform that helps medical students and residents connect and help each other survive the stress of medical training. The community is based on Mount Sinai’s PEERS program, which is a curriculum comprised of small group sessions that address medical school and residency stressors, and provide skills for managing these challenges.

 

From left to right: Murad Khan, MD, Annie Hart, MD, Psychiatry Innovation Lab judge Debbie Profit, PhD, Isobel Rosenthal, MD, MBA, and Jordyn Feingold, MAPP and MD/MSCR candidate. Photo courtesy of David Hathcox.

 

Hot on the Trail: Schizophrenia

On April 23, Dolores Malaspina, MD, MS, MSPH, published results of a study on marriage duration and how it affects schizophrenia risk in offspring. She found that if a specific man and a woman had a shorter duration of sexual contact before conception, their child would be at a higher risk of developing schizophrenia. The authors write that “offspring born to parents married fewer than two years, equivalent to about one year of pre-pregnancy sexual contact, had a 50 percent increase in risk for schizophrenia.” Children from marriages of 2-4 years had a 30 percent increase in risk.

Marriage duration is not typically indicative of duration of sexual contact; however, this analysis was performed on the children of the 1964-1976 Jerusalem Perinatal Cohort Schizophrenia Study, and the records show that 97 percent of them were born to married couples. At that time, Israel had one of the lowest worldwide rates of out-of-wedlock births, so marriage duration in this population is a reasonable proxy for sexual contact.

Dr. Malaspina has been a psychiatrist for 30 years, and has 300 publications under her belt.

This marriage duration risk factor is independent of established risk factors such as family history of psychiatric disorders and the father’s age at the time of conception. Accounting for the duration of the couple’s sexual contact magnifies the effect of paternal age on offspring risk for schizophrenia, and both factors together explain any effect of later paternal age at marriage. “When older men get married, they are more likely to have babies right away. This could mean that the father’s age at marriage is not a causal factor,” said Dr. Malaspina.

The shorter periods of sexual contact before conception also increase the risk for preeclampsia, a complication during pregnancy that includes high blood pressure, swelling, and high urine protein levels. Dr. Malaspina theorizes that the risk pathway for preeclampsia, which includes prenatal immune activation, could increase the risk for inflammatory conditions such as schizophrenia in offspring. She is working on replicating these findings in other cohorts, and anticipates being able to test if the pathways to schizophrenia include prenatal immune activation.

This is just the latest finding in Dr. Malaspina’s expansive career, which has spanned genetics, zoology, epidemiology, and more. Rather than looking at just symptoms and behavior, her research involves examining the larger picture of the disease, including associated metabolic diseases, physical biomarkers, and gene mutations. She has a track record of thinking outside the box and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to find pathways to severe mental illnesses, especially schizophrenia. “It’s working across boundaries that really invigorates progress,” she says.

Dr. Malaspina’s particular interest in schizophrenia has to do with the fact that the illness “fundamentally impairs the ability to function—it interferes with social signaling and group selection.” It also comes from her personal experience. She has been on a lifelong quest to understand the underlying factors of schizophrenia ever since her sister, Eileen, was diagnosed in 1971.

The beginning

Her sister’s grades started to slip in her senior year of high school, and she became increasingly paranoid that the neighbors were talking about her and that helicopters were monitoring her activities. She was unable to eat or sleep, and in a constant state of terror. Her family took her to the hospital, where she was diagnosed with schizophrenia. At that time, psychiatrists often blamed the “schizophrenogenic mother” for the disease, meaning that a mother’s cold, domineering, and manipulative personality triggered distrust, resentfulness, and psychosis in her child. This blame on Dr. Malaspina’s mother heaped immense guilt onto her already grieving and distressed family. Deeply affected by this experience, Dr. Malaspina decided to become a scientist and psychiatrist and to devote her career to getting to the bottom of the true causes of this disease.

Career trajectory

She wasted no time. Dr. Malaspina got her MS in zoology and then her MD at Rutgers University. She completed a residency in psychiatry and a clinical research fellowship at Columbia University Medical Center, and at the end of her residency transitioned to independent investigator. Two years later, she was named founding chief of the Schizophrenia Research Unit at the New York State Psychiatric Institute. She stayed at Columbia for 22 years, covering all academic levels: chief resident, research fellow, assistant professor, associate professor, and full professor. In 1998, she received her MS in public health of epidemiology at Columbia. In 2006, she moved to NYU to become the Chair of the Department of Psychiatry, where she founded and directed the Institute of Social and Psychiatric Initiatives (InSPIRES), a multidisciplinary research program.

Breakthroughs

Dr. Malaspina has received nearly continuous NIMH funding throughout her career, and has a collection of scientific discoveries under her belt. She was the first to demonstrate that paternal aging is a predictor of schizophrenia, which has been replicated worldwide. “Some people said it’s just that older men are carrying more genetic risk for schizophrenia, which delayed their childbearing and explains the increased risk of the disease for their offspring,” she said. Her pioneering work on higher paternal age and its correlation with schizophrenia risk stimulated hundreds of follow-up studies confirming the findings, and her new study confirms that older paternal age at marriage is not a risk factor.

Dr. Malaspina also showed hippocampal inflammation in those with schizophrenia, and that olfaction, or the sense of smell, is related to social function. She defined four versions of schizophrenia via gene analysis, showing each subtype had a discrete presentation. She also looked at the effects of the Six Day  War of 1967 on pregnancies, and discovered that early pregnancy trauma was a risk factor for schizophrenia in females.

Moving to Mount Sinai

In 2017, Dr. Malaspina moved to Mount Sinai and is now director of the psychosis program Critical Connections. Why Mount Sinai? “The leadership in other institutions is not as aware of the amazing impact that psychiatric disorders have on society,” she said. “I love that Mount Sinai cuts across molecular science, epidemiology, clinical trials, outcomes, and research, and the sheer size and number of scientists working here makes it really special. Also, the new chair, René Kahn, MD, PhD, himself an impressive schizophrenia researcher, had recruited a group of accomplished schizophrenia experts, so it was a wonderful opportunity to work with them.”  She adds that Mount Sinai has a fantastic burgeoning genetics department, which is a critical component of her own research. “I hope that we are close to defining specific different pathways to schizophrenia that can lead to precise treatments to prevent and cure the disease, rather than our current ‘one size fits all’ treatment approaches,” she said.

Dr. Malaspina is Professor of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and Genetics and Genomic Sciences at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, where she is also the Director of the Critical Connections Psychosis Program in collaboration with the Nash Family Department of Neuroscience and the Division of Psychiatric Genomics. Her MS is in zoology, and her MSPH is in epidemiology. 

 

30 Years on the Forefront of Trauma Research

Dr. Yehuda in Burlington, Vermont, where she was giving a talk about molecular markers of suicide risk in returning veterans.

In January, Rachel Yehuda, MS, PhD, was in Israel learning how to use MDMA-assisted psychotherapy to treat PTSD. MDMA, sometimes known as ecstasy, is poised to become a powerful treatment option for PTSD. In 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration designated it as a breakthrough therapy when coupled with psychotherapy sessions that last up to eight hours. The results of preliminary clinical studies are promising, and the drug could be approved by the FDA by 2021.

To prepare the caregivers who will be administering it, the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies has been holding MDMA therapy training programs, such as the one Dr. Yehuda attended in Israel. As part of the training, the therapists themselves undergo MDMA-assisted psychotherapy. Dr. Yehuda’s goal is for the James J. Peters VA Medical Center in the Bronx (which is affiliated with Mount Sinai), where she is the Mental Health Patient Care Center Director, to be the first VA medical center to offer this treatment to veterans. She is also planning to investigate the mechanisms of this treatment by evaluating genomic and molecular biomarkers before and after treatment, as she has been doing with other pharmacological and psychotherapy treatments for PTSD.

“MDMA produces a substantial change in mental state that increases people’s ability to engage with traumatic material in psychotherapy,” she said. “This is important because it is easy for trauma survivors to avoid their feelings of shame, vulnerability, fear, and guilt. Because this treatment seems to work so well, studying dysregulated molecules and pathways before and after MDMA therapy may help us understand more about how resilience is achieved from a neurochemical perspective.”

This is only the latest example of Dr. Yehuda being on the cutting edge of trauma treatment. She has spent her career far ahead of the curve in PTSD, anticipating the use of biological markers for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment-matching. Her work has also been at the forefront of identifying molecular processes involved in PTSD risk, susceptibility, resilience, and recovery.

The beginning

Dr. Yehuda started her career as a postdoctoral fellow in biological psychology at Yale Medical School in 1987. Her dissertation focused on how stress hormones regulated important developmental brain processes in animal models, but she was curious about the applicability in humans. Her postdoctoral work produced some of the initial findings on the endocrinology and neurochemistry of PTSD, and as a new assistant professor at Mount Sinai in 1991, she led a group that was among the first to look at specific biological differences in people who have survived trauma and have PTSD.

Dr. Yehuda and her colleagues observed that Vietnam War combat veterans with PTSD had significantly lower levels of cortisol, a steroid hormone that helps regulate physiological responses to stress, compared to people without PTSD. This finding was provocative because elevated cortisol levels are associated with stress, and it seemed counterintuitive for cortisol levels to be decreased in those suffering from PTSD. This discovery was the first step towards understanding that PTSD involves a failure to recover from normal processes involved in responding to stress, and helped identify targets for prevention and treatment.

Towards the end of her postdoctoral fellowship, Dr. Yehuda became interested in whether the observations made about combat Vietnam veterans could be applied more generally to other groups of trauma survivors, so she decided to initiate biological studies in Holocaust survivors. Dr. Yehuda had known many Holocaust survivors growing up in the Jewish community in Cleveland. At first glance, they did not seem to have similar psychological or behavioral issues to combat veterans from the Vietnam War.

As a pilot study, Dr. Yehuda brought a research group to Cleveland and set up a lab in her parents’ basement. The team interviewed approximately 100 Holocaust survivors and obtained urine and blood samples to determine stress hormone levels. They were surprised to learn that about half of those interviewed had PTSD, and also demonstrated lower cortisol levels—similar to what had been observed with the Vietnam veterans. An important difference, however, was that Holocaust survivors typically weren’t treatment-seeking, and they didn’t have a dedicated institution like the VA. To rectify this, Dr. Yehuda started a Holocaust treatment clinic at The Mount Sinai Hospital in 1992 to treat survivors and their offspring.

A key to prevention

The cortisol findings shaped the trajectory of the rest of Dr. Yehuda’s career. Her work over the years shows that in people with PTSD, cortisol levels don’t increase the way they should to counteract adrenaline and calm the body, which is what leads to resilience and recovery.

Finding a way to increase cortisol could be a method to prevent PTSD, and Dr. Yehuda has been investigating options. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has one of the largest programs in the country for the study of PTSD biomarkers, and funding to further her research has brought in approximately $12 million over the last decade. She anticipates an award notice for an almost $6 million grant from the Department of Defense in April for a study that provides trauma patients in hospital emergency rooms with an injection of synthetic cortisol, to mimic the body’s calming system and prevent PTSD. If it works, the potential for soldiers to self-administer on the battlefield would be game-changing.

She’s also working with combat veterans in collaboration with the New York Stem Cell Foundation to examine molecular aspects of PTSD. The study involves converting fibroblasts from skin into induced pluripotent stem cells, then reprogramming them into neurons and stimulating the neurons with stress hormones to see whether response to stress hormones is genetically predetermined.

A new finding on the effects of trauma on the next generation

In 2016, Dr. Yehuda published results of a study showing that Holocaust survivors and their adult offspring had epigenetic changes on the same region of a stress-related gene. Epigenetics has been described as the software that directs the body’s hardware (genes)—changes caused by modified gene expressions as opposed to changing the genes themselves.

This finding was the latest discovery in what had been a 25-year examination of the effects of the Holocaust on their offspring. The research began when adult children of Holocaust survivors called the Mount Sinai Specialized Treatment Program for Holocaust Survivors asking to be treated. A series of studies demonstrated that Holocaust offspring had several psychological and endocrine findings in association with maternal and paternal Holocaust exposure and PTSD.

In this latest study, Dr. Yehuda reported altered methylation on a gene known as FKBP5 in both Holocaust survivors and their own children: this constituted the first demonstration of a link between parental trauma and offspring effects. The finding was a natural extension of prior work examining effects on offspring in women who were pregnant while exposed to the 9/11 attacks. As she said on the On Being podcast, “We learned that there was a trimester effect on cortisol levels in the babies. That was really huge for us, because we began to understand that some of the differences between maternal and paternal trauma and risk might have to do with in-utero contributions to changing the stress system.”

Veterans’ therapy: Thinking outside the box 

Last year, Dr. Yehuda got a veterans film-making workshop series off the ground in collaboration with the Patton Veterans Project at the James J. Peters VA Medical Center in the Bronx. The workshops serve as a therapeutic tool to empower veterans to contemplate their experiences and work collaboratively to create short films about their time serving and/or reintegration upon returning.

“I’m fascinated with film-making and applying it to veterans because I think storytelling can be essential for healing,” she said. “In fact, the existing therapies for PTSD really are rooted in the idea of telling one’s story. When you make a film, you’re telling the story from the perspective of how the viewer will receive it. And this kind of rotating from different angles and thinking of trauma in a different way is an important part of the therapeutic process. The trauma itself is no longer the end of the story—the story moves, and you move with it. Writing can do this, acting in a play, music—the so-called right-brain type of expressions.”

These examples are just a selection of Dr. Yehuda’s groundbreaking research on trauma—why it happens, how we can prevent it, and how we can treat it. “What all the studies point to is that life events have transformative powers on our biology and behavior,” she said. “By understanding how experience changes us, we can harness that knowledge towards achieving resilience.”

Dr. Yehuda is Professor of Psychiatry and Neuroscience at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, where she is also the Vice Chair for Veterans Affairs in the Department of Psychiatry as well as Director of the Traumatic Stress Studies Division. This division includes the PTSD Clinical Research Program and the Neurochemistry and Neuroendocrinology Lab at the James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center in the Bronx. Her PhD is in psychology and neurochemistry, and her MS is in biological psychology.