A New Twice-Yearly PrEP: What Is Yeztugo?

There are many different ways people can protect themselves against HIV. First, there was a daily pill. Then, an injectable that is taken every two months became available. Now, a new option with a longer time between dosing is out: In June, Gilead Sciences announced it had received approval for Yeztugo® (lenacapavir) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Yeztugo is an injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against HIV, taken twice a year in a clinic setting. PrEP medications prevent HIV infections in various ways.

Yeztugo falls into the class of capsid inhibitors, which work by targeting the protein shell that protects the virus’s genetic material and enzymes.

“I’m excited that we’re getting more options,” said Antonio Urbina, MD, Medical Director for the Institute for Advanced Medicine at Mount Sinai. “There are many different people out there with different circumstances, and the more options we have out there to protect people from HIV, the better.”

What is Yeztugo, and who might it be suitable for? In a Q&A, Dr. Urbina explains the drug in detail and how it stacks up against other PrEP options.

Antonio Urbina, MD, Medical Director, Institute for Advanced Medicine at Mount Sinai

How effective is Yeztugo at protecting against HIV?

Two large phase 3 clinical trials were used as evidence for Yeztugo to be approved: PURPOSE 1 and PURPOSE 2. The two trials examined more than 8,000 participants collectively.

What stood out to me was that these studies not only examined the drug in cisgender men who have sex with men, but also transgender men and women, nonbinary people, and adolescent girls. They were very inclusive studies.

The data were extraordinary: in PURPOSE 1, there were zero HIV infections in the Yeztugo group, whereas the daily oral PrEP group had 16 cases. In PURPOSE 2, there were two HIV infections in the Yeztugo group, while the daily oral PrEP group had 16 acquisitions.

Statistical analysis not only showed Yeztugo was significantly superior at preventing HIV compared to the background rate, but also to the daily PrEP group.

How is Yeztugo given?

On the first visit, the patient is given two injections, and two pill versions of the same drug to take in the clinic. Then, the patient is given two of the same pills to take home to take on the second day.

It is very important for patients to take the second-day pills, because doing so will ensure peak plasma concentration that same day. That means patients will have achieved optimal protection against HIV in as quickly as two days, which is impressive. If the patient fails to take the pills, that protection can be delayed by as much as 10 days.

After that, the patient only needs to come in every six months for injections, with a flexibility window of two weeks before and after the date.

What are its side effects?

The most common side effects occurred at the injection site. There were the usual pain, swelling, and itchiness reactions, and most were mild to moderate. However, there is an injection site reaction that occurred in a large proportion of patients—roughly 65 percent—which was described as the formation of a “nodule.”

To understand these nodules, we have to go into how this drug works. Yeztugo is injected into the subcutaneous layer, under the skin but above the muscle. A deposit of the drug sits there and dissipates over time. For many patients, the nodules might not be visible, although if you touch the site, you might feel a slight lump there.

For some patients, the nodules might be slightly visible and appear raised. Thus, patients are offered a choice on injection sites, and Yeztugo can be given in the abdomen area or the thigh. It is important to educate patients on what to expect.

And for some, the nodules never develop at all. It does not mean, however, that the drug is not working. It varies by patient.

What might be the advantage of Yeztugo over other PrEP options?

One of the biggest challenges of daily oral PrEP is adherence. People are forgetful. When enough daily doses are missed, the protection wanes. Having an option every six months ensures there are no gaps.

The fact that you have to go into clinic for this option—while a hassle—is actually helpful for fighting stigma. Some people don’t like having these medications visible in their cabinets, or having to interact with pharmacists about them.

Lastly—this is less talked about—is the potential to bring more accessible HIV prevention into vulnerable communities and populations. It is harder to bring pills to a community and ask them to take them every day, and refill them every month, compared to giving injections just twice a year. Also, Yeztugo is approved for adolescents, which makes this accessible to younger people as well.

How does one access Yeztugo?

It starts with a conversation with your care provider. There are many different PrEP options out there, and if it is determined a patient would like to go with Yeztugo, an HIV test is done to ensure the patient is negative before starting the regimen.

And then, at subsequent visits, all the label for Yeztugo requires is to document that the patient is HIV negative. Gilead Sciences has not set any sort of protocol for maintenance testing.

However, just because this option is taken twice a year doesn’t mean that the patient should only go for screening that number of times. If a person is very sexually active, it’s a good idea to go for screening not just for HIV, but also other sexually transmitted infections, every three months.

Will Yeztugo be covered by insurance?

The news media has reported that Yeztugo has a list price of roughly $28,000 per year, or about $14,000 per shot. That is a large price tag to swallow, but with commercial insurance, out-of-pocket costs are likely to be lower. Depending on an individual’s insurance, that copay might still be too high, though.

With Yeztugo’s approval being recent, insurance companies are waiting for guidance from state and federal regulatory bodies, including Medicaid. The New York State Department of Health’s AIDS Institute has already given an interim recommendation to clinicians for Yeztugo as a “preferred PrEP regimen,” as long the individual doesn’t mind injections every six months. I’m hopeful that insurance will soon cover Yeztugo on their list of covered drugs.

What has Gilead Sciences said about copay assistance for Yeztugo?

In various statements, the company has said that for people with commercial insurance, through its Copay Saving Program, out-of-pocket costs may be reduced to as low as zero. Some uninsured eligible individuals might also be able to access Yeztugo free of charge through its Advancing Access Patient Assistance Program.

What are the current options for PrEP?

  Truvada Descovy Apretude Yeztugo
Generic drug name Emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide Cabotegravir Lenacapivir
Administration Pill, oral Pill, oral Intramuscular injection, gluteal (buttock) Subcutaneous injection, abdomen or thigh
Dosing Daily Daily Every two months Every six months
Class of drug Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor Integrase strand transfer inhibitor Capsid inhibitor
Generic available Yes No No No

A New Hope on Organ Transplants for People With HIV

People with HIV are now living healthier, longer lives thanks to advances in antiretroviral therapy, but they can still have chronic diseases like diabetes and hypertension. Eventually, they might need organ replacements, like kidneys, but this group of people has been at a disadvantage.

Patients with HIV have been known to receive lower priority on waitlists given the shortage of organs and misconceptions about the patients’ ability to receive them. But what if we could increase the pool of available organs by allowing the use of organs from donors with HIV for recipients with HIV?

A new milestone was achieved in a first-of-its-kind study in the United States in which Mount Sinai was a major player. The HOPE study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, showed that not only are kidney transplants from HIV+ donors safe and effective, they are just as much so as transplants from HIV- donors.

“It had been illegal, by federal law, to use HIV+ organs,” says Sander Florman, MD, Director of the Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute at Mount Sinai and an author of the paper. “Prior to the HOPE Act signed by then-President Obama, organs with HIV had to be discarded. But if we can show it is safe to use organs from people with HIV, why not use them, so that HIV+ people can get transplanted quicker?”

“Eventually, the goal of this study is to move HIV-to-HIV kidney transplants out of just research and into a standard of care,” says Meenakshi Rana, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and an author of the paper. “This has larger implications not just for people with HIV, but for everyone who’s on a waitlist—if a person with HIV can receive an organ faster from a donor with HIV, then everyone on the list also moves up.”

Drs. Florman and Rana discuss the importance of the HOPE study, how it could destigmatize organ transplants for people with HIV, and future impacts.

What’s the history of organ transplantation for people who are HIV+?

In the past, people with HIV were considered not medically suitable for organ transplants. It was thought that the immune-suppressing drugs required to prevent organ rejection might cause the HIV to develop into AIDS, says Dr. Florman.

In the late 1990s, Mount Sinai showed that it was possible to do a living liver donation to a patient with HIV. “It was extremely controversial,” says Dr. Florman. “At the time, nobody was doing HIV transplants. And second of all, very few centers in the country were doing living-donor liver transplants.”

Sandy Florman, MD, Director of the Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute at Mount Sinai (left) and Meenakshi Rana, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Infectious Diseases (right).

What is the current law on use of organs from donors with HIV?

In regulations dating to 1988, it was made illegal to transplant or even study organs from donors with HIV. In 2013, President Obama signed the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act, which lifted the research ban.

On November 26, 2024, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced a final rule stating kidney and liver transplants involving donors and recipients with HIV no longer need to be done under the auspices of a clinical trial. The decision was motivated by evidence from studies enabled by the HOPE Act that showed such procedures were safe and effective.

In the 2000s, Mount Sinai participated in another trial that showed it was possible to transplant kidneys from donors without HIV to recipients with HIV—a trial that was the predecessor to the HOPE study.

However, people with HIV faced more than just medical skepticism—they also faced social stigma.

What does having an undetectable HIV load mean?

Having an undetectable load, or simply being undetectable, means HIV levels in a person are so low that they cannot transmit the virus to another person sexually. This is typically achieved through antiretroviral therapy.

“Even with the advent of the medications, where your HIV can be well controlled and you could live a normal life, there is stigma among some medical professionals about getting a needlestick or getting splashed in the eye with blood,” says Dr. Florman. “The reality is that part of the criteria for doing these transplants is that the candidates need to have well-controlled HIV, even undetectable viral load. And so the risk of getting HIV from a needlestick or a splash is actually very low, although not zero.”

What were the HOPE study results?

The HOPE study transplanted 198 kidneys into recipients with HIV. Half of those kidneys were from donors with HIV and the other half from donors without. Mount Sinai was the largest enroller of the trial, transplanting 55 patients.

  • There was no significant difference in outcomes between both groups, including overall survival at one year and three years, survival without graft loss at one year and three years, and rejection at one year.
  • Adverse events, infections, and complications were similar between both groups, and any HIV-related infection events were able to be treated.

What impacts could this study have?

“Even though we’ve had previous findings that people with HIV could receive transplants, historically, people with HIV have had longer wait times in terms of access to an organ, and higher mortality rates,” says Dr. Rana. “So one of the huge implications of this study is that it could really reduce the wait time of access to organ transplantation for people with HIV, and that’s really important for reducing disparities in transplant.”

That goal is one step closer to becoming reality. On November 26, 2024, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced a final rule stating that after a decade of studies enabled by the HOPE Act, kidney and liver transplants between donors and recipients with HIV are now permitted, and no longer have to be done as clinical trials.

This announcement will hopefully encourage organ procurement organizations (OPOs) to be more inclusive of donors with HIV. “Some OPOs have been good and pursued donors with HIV. Others have not been interested for a variety of reasons. Hopefully, as more HIV patients are able to access transplants, these OPOs would follow the demand and seek more donors with HIV,” says Dr. Florman.

Additionally, the study could expand awareness among patients with HIV and providers that access to life-saving transplantation is more a possibility than ever, says Dr. Rana.

Does this mean people with HIV should consider becoming donors?

“I would definitely want to encourage people with HIV to become donors,” says Dr. Rana. “This would help destigmatize what it means to be a person living with HIV.”

“The patients we helped transplant have always been very grateful, especially because other centers often wouldn’t offer them the procedure,” says Dr. Florman. “But I was surprised that people with HIV who don’t need transplants are grateful that they can now be organ donors. Because now they feel a sense of pride in the idea that they, too, can be organ donors and help save other lives.”

Pin It on Pinterest