AI Spotlight: Forecasting ICU Patient States for Improved Outcomes
Girish Nadkarni, MD, MPH, and Faris Gulamali
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have seen increasing use in health care, from guiding clinicians in diagnosis to helping them decide the best course of treatment. However, AI still has much unrealized potential in various health care settings.
Mount Sinai researchers are exploring bringing AI into intensive care, and developed Spatial Resolved Temporal Networks (SpaRTeN), a model to assess high-frequency patient data and generate representations of their state in real time.
The work was presented at the Time Series Representation Learning for Health workshop on Friday, May 5, hosted by the International Conference for Learned Representations, a premier gathering dedicated to machine learning.
Hear from Girish Nadkarni, MD, MPH, Irene and Dr. Arthur Fishberg Professor of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the leader of the SpaRTeN research, and Faris Gulamali, medical student at Icahn Mount Sinai and member of the Augmented Intelligence in Medicine and Science lab, on what lay behind creating the model and what it could achieve for patients.
What was the motivation for your study?
A growing amount of research is indicating the need to redefine critical illness by biological state rather than a non-specific illness syndrome. Advances in genomics, data science, and machine learning have generated evidence of different underlying etiologies for common ICU syndromes. As a result, patients with the exact same diagnosis can have entirely different outcomes.
What are the implications?
In the ICU, representations of a patient can be used to guide personalized treatments based on personalized diagnoses rather than generic treatments with empirical diagnoses.
What are the limitations of the study?
In this study, we only looked at using one type of data at a time in real time. For example, we looked primarily at measures of intracranial pressure. However, the ICU has many types of data being output simultaneously. Future work hopes to integrate all the different types of data such as electrocardiograms, blood pressure, and imaging to improve patient representations.
How might these findings be put to use?
These patient representations are being combined with data on medications and procedures to determine how to optimize patient treatment based on underlying state rather than common illness syndromes.
What is your plan for following up on this study?
In this study, we focused primarily on creating the algorithm and showing that it works for the case of intracranial hypertension. In future studies, we would like to integrate multiple data modalities such as imaging, electrocardiograms, and blood pressure as well as intervention-based data such as medications and procedures to determine precise empirical interventions that lead to improvements in short-term and long-term patient outcomes.
Learn more about how Mount Sinai researchers and clinicians are leveraging machine learning to improve patient lives